Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600819.SS Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group Co.,Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group Co.,Ltd. Class A600819.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Industrial Specialties
Momentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$643M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
31%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.07M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.1 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥5.22
1D-1.7%
1W+4.8%
1M-5.6%
3M-4.6%
6M-23.6%
YTD-35.4%
1Y-33.2%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh48.3% off high

What Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass does

Employees: 3,876

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass at a glance

Size Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass (600819.SS) is a China Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $643M, the 3257th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.22 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.6%, against -4.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.1%); the operating margin is 1.6% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 30.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.9× (5th most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.1 points below its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95600819.SS 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥5.60BCN¥5.62BCN¥5.62BCN¥5.57B-CN¥2.81B
Revenue growth—0%+1%——
Gross profitCN¥1.20BCN¥962MCN¥905MCN¥609M-CN¥6.95B
EBITDAn/aCN¥574MCN¥550MCN¥270MCN¥374M
Net incomeCN¥54.3MCN¥136MCN¥116M-CN¥125MCN¥15.2M
Free cash flow-CN¥270MCN¥55.2MCN¥155MCN¥275MCN¥17.5M
Capital expenditureCN¥922MCN¥641MCN¥530MCN¥283MCN¥459M
Total debtCN¥1.83BCN¥1.61BCN¥1.53BCN¥1.64BCN¥1.57B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%4956RAIN600293MATV4044FCL6031106036300737BORORENEW688199300221SGL603375SFL9893603683300731603330600819.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%50×100×4956RAINMATVFCL300737688199300221SGLSFL300731600819.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass is the large dot.

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600819.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.6%-5.0%11th highest of 21
6-month return-23.6%-4.3%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-48.3%-27.4%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.5%+5.1%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin1.6%6.6%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E30.7×18.9×5th most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.1 pp-3.9 pp8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass 600819.SSChina$643M-24%0%2%30.7×n/an/a
Konishi 4956.TJapan$643M+9%+7%9%12.3×-10.1%+4.9%
Rain Industries RAIN.NSIndia$645M+35%+17%10%12.4×n/an/a
Hubei Sanxia New Building Materials 600293.SSChina$640M+15%-34%-21%n/an/an/a
Mativ MATVUnited States$646M+27%+1%4%11.0×6.2%+13.0%
Central Glass 4044.TJapan$648M0%+4%8%10.6×-6.5%-5.4%
Fineotex Chemical FCL.NSIndia$635M+86%+91%15%34.4×n/an/a
New East New Materials 603110.SSChina$633M-5%-5%2%n/an/an/a
KeePer Technical Laboratory 6036.TJapan$631M+24%+12%27%15.6×-2.6%+17.1%
Keshun Waterproof Technologies 300737.SZChina$656M-41%-12%-8%34.2×-15.7%-0.6%
Borosil Renewables BORORENEW.NSIndia$628M-29%+11%26%n/a12.7%+25.4%
Tianjin Jiuri New Materials 688199.SSChina$628M-3%+15%3%64.5×n/an/a
Guangdong Silver Age Sci & Tech 300221.SZChina$667M-16%+7%7%26.3×27.7%+6.0%
SGL Carbon SGL.DEGermany$668M+2%-16%8%18.9×2.3%-1.6%
Wuxi Holyview Microelectronics 603375.SSChina$618M-10%-17%-9%n/a53.9%+17.3%
Sheela Foam SFL.NSIndia$614M-7%+20%6%24.3×23.3%+9.4%
Pizu 9893.HKHong Kong$677M-8%-8%22%n/an/an/a
ZACROS 7917.TJapan$596M-11%+6%7%12.5×n/an/a
Shanghai Smith Adhesive New Material 603683.SSChina$706M-43%+19%4%n/a33.2%+16.0%
Shenzhen Cotran Industrial Material 300731.SZChina$707M-47%-1%-1%127.7×n/an/a
Tianyang New Materials (Shanghai) Technology 603330.SSChina$579M+21%-35%-29%n/a10.6%+4.2%

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Konishi (4956.T), Rain Industries (RAIN.NS), Hubei Sanxia New Building Materials (600293.SS), Mativ (MATV), Central Glass (4044.T), Fineotex Chemical (FCL.NS), New East New Materials (603110.SS), KeePer Technical Laboratory (6036.T).
Is Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.7× against a peer median of 18.9×, 5th most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.6% against -4.3% for the median peer; over one year -33.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.