Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 575A.T MAEZAWA Holdings Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

MAEZAWA Holdings Co., Ltd.575A.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Mkt cap
$445M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
79%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.68M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-6.0 pp
WACC 11.8%
Hurdle
+22 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥1,836
1D-3.1%
1W-0.2%
1M-2.0%
3M+3.3%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh7.9% off high

What MAEZAWA does

No business profile yet.

MAEZAWA at a glance

Size MAEZAWA (575A.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $445M, the 1135th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,836 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 4.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.3%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 3.2%).

Valuation It trades at 2.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.9× (6th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +22 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.0 points below its cost of capital (11.8% WACC).

MAEZAWA financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥25.2B¥25.2B¥24.2B¥23.9B¥23.5B
Revenue growth—+4%+1%+2%—
Gross profit¥9.16B¥9.16B¥8.77B¥8.28B¥8.31B
EBITDA¥3.40B¥3.40B¥3.19B¥2.81B¥3.08B
Net income¥1.86B¥1.86B¥1.71B¥1.36B¥1.46B
Free cash flown/a¥1.08B¥1.07B¥2.00B¥1.05B
Capital expendituren/a¥915M¥915M¥747M¥758M
Total debt¥0¥0¥330M¥330M¥390M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MAEZAWA competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%5×10×15×30037060332430131021688478083450300922301053301112300812603090688215301138171090002795300521301020300095575A.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MAEZAWA is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%30037030130834503009223011123008123011381710903010206517300095575A.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MAEZAWA is the large dot.

MAEZAWA competitors and peer comparison

How MAEZAWA compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MAEZAWA against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure575A.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.0%-14.8%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.9%-52.7%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.1%+8.3%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.2%3.2%8th highest of 21
EV / Sales2.2×3.9×6th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.4%15.3%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.7%+5.3%6th lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+21.7 pp+9.9 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.0 pp-4.5 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA16.1×7.7×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-4.5×-0.7×least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
MAEZAWA 575A.TJapan$445Mn/a+4%9%2.2×25.4%+3.7%
Sichuan Etrol Technologies 300370.SZChina$445M-26%-6%-23%9.1×54.4%-8.2%
Shanghai Shengjian Technology 603324.SSChina$445M-23%-26%-19%4.0×n/an/a
Chenming Electronic Technology 3013.TWTaiwan$445M-38%+13%13%1.2×-2.3%+11.5%
Guangdong Huayan Robotics 1021.HKHong Kong$447M-65%+25%-12%3.9×n/an/a
Crystal Growth and Energy Equipment 688478.SSChina$443M-27%-31%-66%19.0×n/an/a
Global Standard Technology 083450.KSSouth Korea$448M-30%+10%17%1.3×-2.6%+15.8%
Qinhuangdao Tianqin Equipment Manufacturing 300922.SZChina$441M-19%-37%3%16.0×44.3%+0.1%
Yoantion Industrial 301053.SZChina$441M-51%0%4%4.3×n/an/a
United Faith Auto-Engineering 301112.SZChina$439M-26%-42%-27%7.2×43.1%-8.6%
Shenzhen Etmade Automatic Equipment 300812.SZChina$437M-41%+41%-2%4.5×54.7%+8.0%
Wuxi Hongsheng Heat Exchanger Manufacturing 603090.SSChina$454M-53%+13%10%3.6×n/an/a
Zhejiang Risun Intelligent Technology 688215.SSChina$436M-38%+39%8%5.4×n/an/a
Guang Zhou Huayan Precision Machinery 301138.SZChina$436M-27%-2%16%3.2×15.3%+5.3%
SUNIC SYSTEM 171090.KSSouth Korea$436M-39%+34%19%1.5×-6.7%+51.0%
Shakti Pumps (India) SHAKTIPUMP.NSIndia$456M-41%+16%9%1.7×n/an/a
Yorhe Fluid Intelligent Control 002795.SZChina$434M-29%-19%-12%4.9×n/an/a
AMSKY Technology 300521.SZChina$434M-33%+7%-14%14.5×n/an/a
Yantai Ishikawa Sealing Technology 301020.SZChina$433M-15%+11%17%3.6×11.2%+3.0%
Denyo 6517.TJapan$433M-5%+10%11%0.7×-5.4%+5.6%
Jiangxi Huawu Brake 300095.SZChina$433M-21%-9%-18%2.7×27.6%-0.4%

Questions

Which companies are MAEZAWA's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sichuan Etrol Technologies (300370.SZ), Shanghai Shengjian Technology (603324.SS), Chenming Electronic Technology (3013.TW), Guangdong Huayan Robotics (1021.HK), Crystal Growth and Energy Equipment (688478.SS), Global Standard Technology (083450.KS), Qinhuangdao Tianqin Equipment Manufacturing (300922.SZ), Yoantion Industrial (301053.SZ).
Is MAEZAWA expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.2× against a peer median of 3.9×, 6th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +22 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.