Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5186.T Nitta CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Nitta Corporation5186.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Industrial Specialties

Japanese maker of conveyor belts, industrial rubber/plastic products and precision components for factories.

≈ A diversified industrial rubber/belting makerMomentum strong 71
Mkt cap
$1.05B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.58M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
+8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥6,060
1D-7.5%
1W-13.1%
1M-14.4%
3M-5.5%
6M+36.0%
YTD+43.8%
1Y+48.0%
ATR %4.4%
52w lowhigh17.6% off high

What Nitta does

Japanese maker of conveyor belts, industrial rubber/plastic products and precision components for factories.

Sells belts and hoses that wear out and are replaced, which gives repeat business with factories and warehouses. A separate precision line supplies components to electronics makers, including polishing pads used in chip manufacturing.

In one line: A diversified industrial rubber/belting maker.

Products and services

  • Conveyor belts
  • Industrial hoses
  • Precision plastic/rubber components

Customers

  • Manufacturing plants
  • Logistics/warehouse operators
  • Electronics/robotics makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Industrial rubber and plastics
  • Conveyor belts, hoses, precision…

What could go right

  • Warehouse/factory automation buildout

What could go wrong

  • Industrial capex cyclicality

Moat: none (process know-how). Diversified rubber/plastics maker competing on engineering fit rather than scale or brand.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 1934 · Employees: 2,993

Named competitors

Nitta at a glance

Size Nitta (5186.T) is a Japan Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $1.05B, the 713th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥6,060 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 36.0%, against -16.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.7%); the operating margin is 7.2% (peer median 9.3%).

Valuation It trades at 10.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.2× (4th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Relative performance

10012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20265186.T 136Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Nitta against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Nitta financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥94.6B¥91.8B¥90.3B¥88.6B¥88.0B
Revenue growth—+2%+2%+1%—
Gross profit¥27.1B¥25.9B¥24.2B¥22.3B¥22.5B
EBITDA¥10.1B¥9.11B¥8.61B¥7.89B¥8.28B
Net income¥14.9B¥13.5B¥12.1B¥9.86B¥10.9B
Free cash flown/a¥5.49B¥503M¥6.16B¥8.57B
Capital expendituren/a¥4.42B¥6.76B¥3.08B¥3.55B
Total debt¥1.90B¥1.11B¥1.20B¥1.22B¥1.65B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Nitta competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%60007546284617688087603071ELANTASMGAM603227300063PCBL6039770009280021634634MATR40953433538417850022565186.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Nitta is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×4617688087603071MGAM603227PCBL6039770009280021634634MATR53845186.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Nitta is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%46284617688087ELANTASMGAM603227300063PCBL0009284634MATR40955186.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Nitta is the large dot.

Nitta competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (5186.T vs 5195.T vs 5108.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Nitta 5186.T$1.05B+36%+5%7%10.8×10.6%
Bando Chemical Industries 5195.T$632M+17%+6%9%11.4×-0.1%
Bridgestone 5108.T$31.7B+28%+6%12%14.0×-1.9%

How Nitta compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Nitta against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5186.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.4%-6.4%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+36.0%-16.0%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.6%-28.9%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.8%+7.7%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.2%9.3%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E10.8×14.2×4th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)10.6%0.0%4th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.1%+6.7%5th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+7.5 pp-8.3 pp4th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp+0.7 pp4th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.9×7.7×3rd most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-3.6×-0.2×2nd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Nitta 5186.TJapan$1.05B+36%+5%7%10.8×10.6%+3.1%
Xinjiang Tianye 600075.SSChina$1.04B-41%-10%-3%n/an/an/a
SK Kaken 4628.TJapan$1.04B+2%+9%13%n/a-19.4%+5.2%
Chugoku Marine Paints,Ltd 4617.TJapan$1.04B+4%+10%13%12.8×0.0%+11.1%
Intco Recycling Resources 688087.SSChina$1.01B-25%+29%12%22.0×0.5%+15.8%
ZJMI Environmental Energy 603071.SSChina$1.00B-15%-4%3%9.2×n/an/a
ELANTAS Beck India ELANTAS.NSIndia$999M+23%+19%21%n/a32.4%+17.2%
Morgan Advanced Materials MGAM.LUnited Kingdom$981M+22%-6%9%14.6×9.4%+1.8%
Xinjiang Xuefeng Sci-Tech (Group) 603227.SSChina$1.14B-17%-8%12%10.3×-7.6%+22.0%
Guangdong Tloong Technology 300063.SZChina$946M-26%+21%2%n/a25.0%-6.6%
PCBL Chemical PCBL.NSIndia$1.16B-8%+6%8%23.5×27.6%+25.1%
Jiangxi Guotai 603977.SSChina$914M-29%+15%9%14.2×n/an/a
Sinosteel Engineering & Technology 000928.SZChina$1.22B-13%+4%5%11.9×-15.6%-1.3%
Hainan Development Holdings Nanhai 002163.SZChina$892M-44%-9%-3%37.0×n/an/a
artience 4634.TJapan$1.25B+18%+7%6%9.3×-3.9%+6.3%
Mattr MATR.TOCanada$879M+108%+25%7%15.6×5.8%+1.5%
Nihon Parkerizing 4095.TJapan$1.26B+16%+5%12%n/a-1.6%+6.7%
TOCALO 3433.TJapan$864M-26%+6%23%11.8×n/an/a
Fujimi 5384.TJapan$1.28B-18%+13%21%15.6×n/an/a
Solar Applied Materials Technology 1785.TWOTaiwan$1.30B-55%+54%10%n/a-0.2%+8.1%
ZETTA 002256.SZChina$843M-40%+25%-5%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Nitta's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bando Chemical (5195.T), Bridgestone (industrial) (5108.T), Habasit (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Xinjiang Tianye (600075.SS), SK Kaken (4628.T), Chugoku Marine Paints,Ltd (4617.T), Intco Recycling Resources (688087.SS), ZJMI Environmental Energy (603071.SS), ELANTAS Beck India (ELANTAS.NS).
Is Nitta expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.8× against a peer median of 14.2×, 4th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Nitta stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +36.0% against -16.0% for the median peer; over one year +48.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.