Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 475150.KS SK Eternix Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

SK Eternix Co., Ltd.475150.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Utilities›Alternative Power Generation

Recently listed small-cap Korean company classified under alternative/renewable power generation; specific operations not confidently known.

Momentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$949M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
31%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
40.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.0 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩37,850
1D-2.8%
1W+5.4%
1M-22.9%
3M-32.2%
6M-34.7%
YTD+82.8%
1Y+79.4%
ATR %7.2%
52w lowhigh56.8% off high

What SK Eternix does

Recently listed small-cap Korean company classified under alternative/renewable power generation; specific operations not confidently known.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Alternative/renewable power generation

Moat: none

Headquarters: South Korea · Employees: 108

SK Eternix at a glance

Size SK Eternix (475150.KS) is a South Korea Utilities company (Alternative Power Generation) with a market value of $949M, the 242nd largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩37,850 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 34.7%, against -29.4% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 39.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.3%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 22.6%).

Valuation It trades at 40.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.0× (5th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.0 points above its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 71475150.KS 69
Six months, rebased to 100: SK Eternix against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

SK Eternix financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024
Revenue₩563B₩386B₩332B
Revenue growth—+16%—
Gross profit₩77.3B₩76.6B₩55.4B
EBITDA₩78.9B₩80.0B₩60.0B
Net income₩7.44B₩30.7B₩22.4B
Free cash flow-₩81.4B-₩39.1B₩54.2B
Capital expenditure₩11.0B₩13.8B₩13.2B
Total debt₩585B₩458B₩292B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SK Eternix competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%3868COXGARNWAAREERTL301046XIFR2072002616KPIGREEN603105SCATCCLEANMAX600821601619INOXGREEN6001676010331407AKSO475150.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SK Eternix is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%0×1,000×2,000×3868COXG301046JNPR475150.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. SK Eternix is the large dot.

SK Eternix competitors and peer comparison

How SK Eternix compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SK Eternix against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure475150.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.9%-9.5%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-34.7%-29.4%6th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-56.8%-42.8%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+39.1%+10.3%6th highest of 21
Operating margin9.2%22.6%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E40.0×14.0×5th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.0 pp-0.5 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA22.4×13.5×3rd most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA6.0×4.6×6th most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
SK Eternix 475150.KSSouth Korea$949M-35%+39%9%40.0×n/an/a
Xinyi Energy 3868.HKHong Kong$863M-38%+2%54%8.1×-2.6%+9.1%
Cox Infrastructure COXG.MCSpain$1.05B-12%+72%9%10.1×n/an/a
Alerion Clean Power ARN.MIItaly$1.11B-35%+13%51%16.4×n/an/a
Waaree Renewable Technologies WAAREERTL.NSIndia$810M-30%+78%17%12.2×24.1%+203.3%
Shanghai Nenghui Technology 301046.SZChina$680M+8%-49%-13%2,690.0×n/an/a
XPLR Infrastructure, LP XIFRUnited States$1.38B-38%-1%3%3.0×n/an/a
Century Wind Power 2072.TWTaiwan$618M-41%+62%22%5.7×-17.2%+41.9%
Guangdong Chant 002616.SZChina$617M-21%-3%7%14.1×-4.3%+3.8%
KPI Green Energy KPIGREEN.NSIndia$615M-40%+40%30%12.0×n/an/a
Zhejiang Sunoren Solar Technology 603105.SSChina$608M-17%+8%23%19.3×3.7%+11.6%
Scatec SCATC.OLNorway$1.50B-16%+16%29%n/an/an/a
Juniper Green Energy JNPR.NSIndia$1.54Bn/a+1,313%52%100.5×n/an/a
Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions CLEANMAX.NSIndia$1.57B+8%+28%44%107.0×n/an/a
Nyocor 600821.SSChina$1.63B-29%-12%12%40.5×6.8%+20.6%
Jiaze Renewables 601619.SSChina$1.65B-34%-5%43%15.0×0.2%+19.7%
Inox Green Energy Services INOXGREEN.NSIndia$537M-37%+16%2%n/an/an/a
Luenmei Quantum 600167.SSChina$1.76B-21%-11%15%19.4×-8.9%-2.1%
Grandtop Yongxing 601033.SSChina$1.83B-2%+6%26%14.0×-5.1%+18.4%
West 1407.TJapan$490M-34%+20%23%8.2×-4.9%-3.6%
Aker Solutions AKSO.OLNorway$1.89B-17%-9%5%5.8×-14.7%+16.9%

Questions

Which companies are SK Eternix's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Xinyi Energy (3868.HK), Cox Infrastructure (COXG.MC), Alerion Clean Power (ARN.MI), Waaree Renewable Technologies (WAAREERTL.NS), Shanghai Nenghui Technology (301046.SZ), XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR), Century Wind Power (2072.TW), Guangdong Chant (002616.SZ).
Is SK Eternix expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 40.0× against a peer median of 14.0×, 5th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has SK Eternix stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -34.7% against -29.4% for the median peer; over one year +79.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.