Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4365.T Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku Co., Ltd.4365.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Industrial Specialties
Momentum strong 74
Mkt cap
$467M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
20%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$87,735
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+9.5 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥22,740
1D-2.8%
1W-3.6%
1M-9.0%
3M+13.4%
6M+10.2%
YTD+13.7%
1Y+21.0%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh11.9% off high

What Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku does

Employees: 399

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku at a glance

Size Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku (4365.T) is a Japan Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $467M, the 1114th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥22,740 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.2%, against -21.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.6%); the operating margin is 20.2% (peer median 4.0%).

Valuation It trades at 0.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.4× (cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.5 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264365.T 108Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥41.7B¥41.1B¥43.1B¥41.5B¥39.6B
Revenue growth—-5%+4%+5%—
Gross profit¥12.7B¥12.4B¥13.7B¥13.0B¥12.0B
EBITDA¥9.40B¥9.18B¥10.3B¥9.72B¥8.85B
Net income¥8.52B¥8.04B¥6.83B¥7.50B¥7.25B
Free cash flown/a¥6.28B¥6.59B¥6.31B¥4.98B
Capital expendituren/a¥381M¥1.18B¥1.06B¥437M
Total debt¥0¥0¥0¥0¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+100%+200%-20%0%301237INDIGOPNTS3009803002250022246881570301300160003002002669ESNT0029173016186003330179604365.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%2×4×6×301237INDIGOPNTS30098030022500222468815703013001600030023002000026697768ESNT6885713005540029173016186003336036810179604365.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku is the large dot.

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku competitors and peer comparison

How Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4365.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.0%-14.0%9th highest of 21
6-month return+10.2%-21.5%3rd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-11.9%-44.2%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.6%+7.6%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin20.2%4.0%highest of 21
EV / Sales0.5×2.4×cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.5 pp-3.8 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA2.1×15.8×cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-6.0×2.6×least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku 4365.TJapan$467M+10%-1%20%0.5×n/an/a
Hangzhou Heshun Technology 301237.SZChina$471M-41%+23%-20%5.0×n/an/a
Indigo Paints INDIGOPNTS.NSIndia$462M-1%+12%13%2.7×27.6%+14.2%
Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology 300980.SZChina$461M-52%+15%5%4.3×21.6%+13.8%
Shanghai Kinlita Chemical 300225.SZChina$472M+7%+20%2%3.2×48.9%-2.0%
Sanlux 002224.SZChina$458M-22%+8%-4%2.2×n/an/a
Sokan New Materials 688157.SSChina$476M-44%-8%-3%4.7×n/an/a
SANVO Fine Chemicals 0301.HKHong Kong$476M+269%+3%-3%3.5×n/an/a
Jiangsu Xiuqiang Glasswork 300160.SZChina$478M-20%-8%7%1.4×1.7%+5.3%
Shanxi Huhua 003002.SZChina$482M-52%-4%6%2.2×12.0%+18.8%
Beijing Comens New Materials 300200.SZChina$491M-24%+20%4%2.4×n/an/a
Kangda New Materials (Group) 002669.SZChina$498M-18%+23%3%1.2×n/an/a
Praise Victor Industrial 7768.TWTaiwan$434Mn/a+3%16%6.2×n/an/a
Essentra ESNT.LUnited Kingdom$430M+37%+7%8%1.3×18.7%-19.6%
Hangzhou Toka Ink 688571.SSChina$429M-26%+4%7%1.6×n/an/a
NanJing Sanchao Advanced Materials 300554.SZChina$508M-27%+6%-51%12.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen King Explorer Science & Technology 002917.SZChina$509M-25%+1%11%2.2×-1.1%+22.8%
Dongguan Changlian New Materials Technology 301618.SZChina$519M-21%+23%4%5.0×48.7%+3.2%
Changchun Gas 600333.SSChina$520M-1%+15%4%2.4×21.2%+9.6%
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products 603681.SSChina$520M-20%+7%1%0.8×28.1%+22.6%
HankukCarbon 017960.KSSouth Korea$526M-71%+11%18%0.6×-20.0%+17.2%

Questions

Which companies are Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hangzhou Heshun Technology (301237.SZ), Indigo Paints (INDIGOPNTS.NS), Hubei Xiangyuan New Material Technology (300980.SZ), Shanghai Kinlita Chemical (300225.SZ), Sanlux (002224.SZ), Sokan New Materials (688157.SS), SANVO Fine Chemicals (0301.HK), Jiangsu Xiuqiang Glasswork (300160.SZ).
Is Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.5× against a peer median of 2.4×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Matsumoto Yushiseiyaku stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.2% against -21.5% for the median peer; over one year +21.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.