Loading…

CELSYS, Inc.3663.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$344M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.29M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥1,665
1D-4.5%
1W-2.4%
1M-8.9%
3M-3.3%
6M+22.3%
YTD-0.2%
1Y-3.0%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh21.2% off high

What CELSYS does

Employees: 260

CELSYS at a glance

Size CELSYS (3663.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $344M, the 1272nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,665 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 22.3%, against -22.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 35.5% (peer median 3.3%).

Valuation It trades at 17.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.6× (4th cheapest of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263663.T 124Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: CELSYS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CELSYS financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥10.3B¥9.47B¥7.14B¥8.09B¥7.54B
Revenue growth—+33%-12%+7%—
Gross profit¥6.82B¥5.76B¥4.84B¥3.91B¥4.16B
EBITDA¥4.34B¥3.66B¥2.90B¥2.13B¥2.31B
Net income¥2.31B¥1.68B¥964M¥626M¥1.05B
Free cash flown/a¥2.55B¥3.70B¥2.28B¥1.46B
Capital expendituren/a¥926M¥724M¥837M¥1.05B
Total debt¥0¥0¥0¥0¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CELSYS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-100%-50%0%+50%-50%0%+50%300930CVXSVRE3007303692688201468707973763006880813668SPIRCBRAIN13843663.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CELSYS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%50×100×68820146873763003668112040VHICBRAIN13843663.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CELSYS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%36926882013011594687376300112040300150VHICBRAIN3663.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. CELSYS is the large dot.

CELSYS competitors and peer comparison

How CELSYS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CELSYS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3663.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.9%-8.8%11th highest of 21
6-month return+22.3%-22.9%4th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-21.2%-54.7%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.9%+6.9%8th highest of 21
Operating margin35.5%3.3%highest of 20
Forward P/E17.6×20.6×4th cheapest of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)3.4%13.6%2nd least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.2%+15.9%4th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.8 pp-4.3 pp5th least demanding of 10
EV / EBITDA11.2×12.3×3rd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-1.2×-2.6×2nd most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CELSYS 3663.TJapan$344M+22%+16%36%17.6×3.4%+8.2%
Hangzhou Yitong New Materials 300930.SZChina$345M-27%+51%7%n/an/an/a
Carvolix CVX.PAFrance$342M+62%-100%n/an/an/an/a
SaverOne 2014 Ltd. ADR SVREUnited States$342M-85%-68%-6,262%n/an/an/a
Hunan Creator Information Technologies 300730.SZChina$346M-28%-4%-53%n/an/an/a
FFRI Security 3692.TJapan$347M+15%+28%29%n/a34.6%+21.9%
Beijing Infosec Technologies 688201.SSChina$340M-9%+7%2%42.1×56.5%+5.5%
Beijing SunwayWorld Science & Technology 301159.SZChina$347M-23%+17%3%n/a53.6%+7.0%
TDC SOFT 4687.TJapan$347M+19%+7%10%13.6×-4.5%+12.1%
7Road 0797.HKHong Kong$338M+83%+71%27%n/an/an/a
DEAR U 376300.KSSouth Korea$338M-40%+20%22%15.0×5.1%+45.1%
Wuhan Xingtu Xinke Electronics 688081.SSChina$337M-59%-13%-49%n/an/an/a
COLOPL 3668.TJapan$337M-4%-13%10%18.9×n/an/a
Wemade 112040.KSSouth Korea$351M-43%-3%6%10.4×5.7%+37.1%
Spire Global SPIRUnited States$351M-53%-33%-108%n/an/an/a
Reconova Technologies 7656.HKHong Kong$336Mn/a+12%-15%n/an/an/a
Beijing Century Real Technology 300150.SZChina$354M-21%-8%0%n/a48.8%+2.2%
Vitalhub VHI.TOCanada$354M-2%+54%12%22.2×13.6%+51.2%
Shanghai WonderTek Software 603189.SSChina$355M-28%+7%-8%n/an/an/a
cBrain A/S CBRAIN.CODenmark$332M+84%-1%24%39.7×11.6%+15.9%
Deepexi Technology 1384.HKHong Kong$356M-88%+86%-9%101.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are CELSYS's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hangzhou Yitong New Materials (300930.SZ), Carvolix (CVX.PA), SaverOne 2014 Ltd. ADR (SVRE), Hunan Creator Information Technologies (300730.SZ), FFRI Security (3692.T), Beijing Infosec Technologies (688201.SS), Beijing SunwayWorld Science & Technology (301159.SZ), TDC SOFT (4687.T).
Is CELSYS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.6× against a peer median of 20.6×, 4th cheapest of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has CELSYS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +22.3% against -22.9% for the median peer; over one year -3.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.