Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3529.TWO eMemory Technology, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

eMemory Technology, Inc.3529.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Taiwan IP-licensing company whose embedded non-volatile memory (NeoFuse OTP/anti-fuse) technology is licensed into other companies' chip designs.

≈ A tiny, royalty-model chip-IP licensor, in the spirit of ARM's model but for embedded memoMomentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$4.17B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$77.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
45.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 10.1%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$1,885
1D-6.9%
1W-24.3%
1M-40.2%
3M-26.8%
6M-57.6%
YTD+9.0%
1Y-18.6%
ATR %9.1%
52w lowhigh60.6% off high

What eMemory Technology does

Taiwan IP-licensing company whose embedded non-volatile memory (NeoFuse OTP/anti-fuse) technology is licensed into other companies' chip designs.

Earns twice from the same design: a licence fee when a chip designer adopts its memory block, and later a royalty on each wafer the foundry ships using it, which is why TSMC and other foundries are partners. It makes no chips itself.

In one line: A tiny, royalty-model chip-IP licensor, in the spirit of ARM's model but for embedded memo.

Products and services

  • NeoFuse OTP/MTP memory IP
  • Anti-fuse memory IP
  • PUF security IP

Customers

  • Foundries (TSMC, UMC, etc.) offering the IP to cus
  • Fabless chip designers licensing the IP

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • IP licensing
  • Embedded non-volatile memory (NVM) IP

What could go right

  • More chips needing embedded NVM (IoT, automotive)
  • Advanced-node IP licensing

What could go wrong

  • Royalty pricing pressure
  • Alternative on-chip memory technologies

Moat: wide (IP / patents, switching costs, distribution). Embedded-memory IP is pre-qualified into major foundries' process design kits, hard to swap out once designed in.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan · Founded: 2000 · Employees: 342

Named competitors

eMemory Technology at a glance

Size eMemory Technology (3529.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $4.17B, the 102nd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$1,885 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 57.6%, against -31.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +24.3%); the operating margin is 61.3% (peer median 4.2%).

Valuation It trades at 45.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.5× (7th most expensive of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 32% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 663529.TWO 43
Six months, rebased to 100: eMemory Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

eMemory Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$4.45BNT$3.85BNT$3.61BNT$3.05BNT$3.22B
Revenue growth—+7%+18%-5%—
Gross profitn/an/aNT$3.46BNT$2.92BNT$3.14B
EBITDANT$2.91BNT$2.43BNT$2.14BNT$1.82BNT$1.93B
Net incomeNT$2.38BNT$1.91BNT$1.83BNT$1.47BNT$1.61B
Free cash flowNT$2.60BNT$2.01BNT$1.94BNT$1.25BNT$1.64B
Capital expenditureNT$178MNT$313MNT$164MNT$363MNT$76.2M
Total debtNT$11.0MNT$7.53MNT$11.6MNT$33.7MNT$5.54M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

eMemory Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-50%-25%0%+25%600732300672AAOIPREMIERENE688147009830300458603160688608688599MXL68804730078223371385SOI6239SYNA3529.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. eMemory Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×150×300672AAOIPREMIERENE688147009830300458603160688608MXL23371385SOI62393529.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. eMemory Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%30067260316068860868859923371385SOISYNA3529.TWOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. eMemory Technology is the large dot.

eMemory Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3529.TWO vs SNPS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
eMemory Technology 3529.TWO$4.17B-58%+17%61%45.0×32.2%
Synopsys SNPS$86.3B-13%+46%12%25.6×39.2%

How eMemory Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

eMemory Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3529.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.2%-17.2%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-57.6%-31.3%2nd lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-60.6%-54.3%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.7%+24.3%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin61.3%4.2%highest of 21
Forward P/E45.0×22.5×7th most expensive of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)32.2%25.9%4th most demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.7%+9.1%5th highest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+15.5 pp+20.2 pp4th least demanding of 9
EV / EBITDA46.1×24.3×2nd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-1.3×0.6×3rd least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
eMemory Technology 3529.TWOTaiwan$4.17B-58%+17%61%45.0×32.2%+16.7%
Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy 600732.SSChina$4.23B-13%+25%-8%n/an/an/a
Hunan Goke Microelectronics 300672.SZChina$4.24B-27%+54%5%56.9×46.0%+19.7%
Applied Optoelectronics AAOIUnited States$4.26B-66%+62%-11%23.5×n/an/a
Premier Energies PREMIERENE.NSIndia$4.28B-13%+32%25%19.7×n/an/a
Jiangsu Leadmicro Nano Technology 688147.SSChina$4.06B-26%-5%3%82.1×n/an/a
Hanwha Solutions 009830.KSSouth Korea$4.30B-49%+14%0%20.1×n/an/a
Chengdu Ultra Pure Applied Materials 301717.SZChina$4.03Bn/a+93%42%n/an/an/a
Allwinner Technology 300458.SZChina$4.02B-25%+26%15%57.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Goodix Technology 603160.SSChina$4.35B-2%-7%6%51.0×26.7%-6.8%
Bestechnic (Shanghai) 688608.SSChina$4.41B+2%-26%8%50.6×42.7%+27.1%
Chongqing Genori Technology 688797.SSChina$4.45Bn/a+37%29%n/an/an/a
Trina Solar 688599.SSChina$3.90B-36%-3%-9%n/a-4.3%+17.9%
MaxLinear MXLUnited States$4.48B-51%+56%-1%12.1×n/an/a
Loongson Technology 688047.SSChina$3.86B-44%+24%-76%n/an/an/a
Maxscend Microelectronics 300782.SZChina$4.51B-47%-6%-25%n/an/an/a
Macronix International 2337.TWTaiwan$4.52B-53%+127%38%1.8×-7.5%-6.2%
Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics 1385.HKHong Kong$4.55B-48%+21%13%12.7×19.3%+18.1%
Soitec SOI.PAFrance$3.79B-38%-34%-6%141.8×25.0%+0.3%
Powertech Technology 6239.TWTaiwan$4.61B-11%+24%13%13.2×n/an/a
Synaptics SYNAUnited States$4.63B-7%+11%-3%21.6×34.6%-2.2%

Questions

Who are eMemory Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Synopsys (SNPS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy (600732.SS), Hunan Goke Microelectronics (300672.SZ), Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI), Premier Energies (PREMIERENE.NS), Jiangsu Leadmicro Nano Technology (688147.SS), Hanwha Solutions (009830.KS).
Is eMemory Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 45.0× against a peer median of 22.5×, 7th most expensive of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 32% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has eMemory Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -57.6% against -31.3% for the median peer; over one year -18.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.