Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300458.SZ Allwinner Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Allwinner Technology Co., Ltd. Class A300458.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Chinese fabless designer of ARM-based system-on-chip processors for tablets, smart cameras, IoT devices and TV boxes.

≈ A budget Chinese Qualcomm for tablets and smart-home devicesMomentum weak 26
Mkt cap
$4.02B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$160M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
57.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.2 pp
WACC 12.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
140 days
26 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥26.95
1D-4.9%
1W+8.8%
1M-10.7%
3M-16.2%
6M-24.7%
YTD-23.1%
1Y-30.7%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh37.5% off high

What Allwinner Technology does

Chinese fabless designer of ARM-based system-on-chip processors for tablets, smart cameras, IoT devices and TV boxes.

Designs processors and sells the chips by the million to device makers, mainly through distributors, with foundries doing the manufacturing, so revenue depends on winning designs in low-cost tablets, cameras and TV boxes and on price competition. Its customers are many small makers rather than a few big brands, which keeps prices low.

In one line: A budget Chinese Qualcomm for tablets and smart-home devices.

Products and services

  • Tablet/smart-device SoCs
  • Smart camera/AI vision SoCs
  • IoT/edge SoCs
  • TV box SoCs

Customers

  • White-box tablet makers
  • Smart camera and IoT device brands
  • TV box manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Semiconductors
  • Fabless SoC design

What could go right

  • Smart camera and AIoT device growth
  • Domestic chip substitution push

What could go wrong

  • Intense price competition from larger rivals
  • Cyclical consumer-electronics demand

Moat: narrow (cost advantage, process know-how). Cost-competitive ARM SoC design and software support, but faces intense price competition.

Headquarters: Zhuhai, China · Founded: 2007 · Employees: 919

Named competitors

Allwinner Technology at a glance

Size Allwinner Technology (300458.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $4.02B, the 637th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥26.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.7%, against -32.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 25.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +24.4%); the operating margin is 15.1% (peer median 1.5%).

Valuation It trades at 57.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 52.8× (6th most expensive of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.2 points above its cost of capital (12.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300458.SZ 75Peer median 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Allwinner Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Allwinner Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.48BCN¥2.83BCN¥2.28BCN¥1.66BCN¥1.51B
Revenue growth—+24%+37%+10%—
Gross profitCN¥1.47BCN¥805MCN¥595MCN¥416MCN¥477M
EBITDAn/aCN¥298MCN¥149MCN¥31.6MCN¥148M
Net incomeCN¥643MCN¥262MCN¥167MCN¥23.0MCN¥211M
Free cash flow-CN¥53.4MCN¥133MCN¥76.2MCN¥105M-CN¥121M
Capital expenditureCN¥279MCN¥151MCN¥120MCN¥83.8MCN¥94.9M
Total debtCN¥178MCN¥183MCN¥111MCN¥200MCN¥317M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Allwinner Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-50%-25%0%+25%6881476885993529688047600732300672AAOISOIPREMIERENE009830603160688608NODMXL3012056880523007822676300458.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Allwinner Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×100×200×300×6881473529300672AAOISOIPREMIERENE009830603160688608NODMXL3012056880522676300458.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Allwinner Technology is the large dot.

Allwinner Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300458.SZ vs 603893.SS vs 2454.TW vs 3034.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Allwinner Technology 300458.SZ$4.02B-25%+26%15%57.3×n/a
Rockchip Electronics 603893.SS$13.4B+16%+39%27%49.1×39.3%
Mediatek 2454.TW$164B+7%+6%15%24.7×40.7%
Novatek Microelectronics 3034.TW$9.16B+18%+2%20%14.1×-4.2%

How Allwinner Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Allwinner Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300458.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.7%-19.3%8th highest of 21
6-month return-24.7%-32.2%7th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-37.5%-54.5%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+25.8%+24.4%10th highest of 21
Operating margin15.1%1.5%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E57.3×52.8×6th most expensive of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.2 pp-8.4 pp3rd highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Allwinner Technology 300458.SZChina$4.02B-25%+26%15%57.3×n/an/a
Chengdu Ultra Pure Applied Materials 301717.SZChina$4.03Bn/a+93%42%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Leadmicro Nano Technology 688147.SSChina$4.06B-26%-5%3%82.1×n/an/a
Trina Solar 688599.SSChina$3.90B-36%-3%-9%n/a-4.3%+17.9%
eMemory Technology 3529.TWOTaiwan$4.17B-58%+17%61%45.0×32.2%+16.7%
Loongson Technology 688047.SSChina$3.86B-44%+24%-76%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy 600732.SSChina$4.23B-13%+25%-8%n/an/an/a
Hunan Goke Microelectronics 300672.SZChina$4.24B-27%+54%5%56.9×46.0%+19.7%
Applied Optoelectronics AAOIUnited States$4.26B-66%+62%-11%23.5×n/an/a
Soitec SOI.PAFrance$3.79B-38%-34%-6%141.8×25.0%+0.3%
Premier Energies PREMIERENE.NSIndia$4.28B-13%+32%25%19.7×n/an/a
Hanwha Solutions 009830.KSSouth Korea$4.30B-49%+14%0%20.1×n/an/a
Shenzhen Goodix Technology 603160.SSChina$4.35B-2%-7%6%51.0×26.7%-6.8%
Bestechnic (Shanghai) 688608.SSChina$4.41B+2%-26%8%50.6×42.7%+27.1%
Chongqing Genori Technology 688797.SSChina$4.45Bn/a+37%29%n/an/an/a
Nordic Semiconductor NOD.OLNorway$3.62B-12%+15%8%54.6×n/an/a
MaxLinear MXLUnited States$4.48B-51%+56%-1%12.1×n/an/a
Linktel Technologies 301205.SZChina$3.60B-39%+54%3%281.1×n/an/a
Suzhou Novosense Microelectronics 688052.SSChina$3.60B-15%+77%-2%209.7×n/an/a
Maxscend Microelectronics 300782.SZChina$4.51B-47%-6%-25%n/an/an/a
Suzhou Novosense Microlectronics 2676.HKHong Kong$3.57B-28%+86%-2%121.4×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Allwinner Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rockchip Electronics (603893.SS), MediaTek (2454.TW), Novatek Microelectronics (3034.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Chengdu Ultra Pure Applied Materials (301717.SZ), Jiangsu Leadmicro Nano Technology (688147.SS), Trina Solar (688599.SS), eMemory Technology (3529.TWO), Loongson Technology (688047.SS), Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy (600732.SS).
Is Allwinner Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 57.3× against a peer median of 52.8×, 6th most expensive of 15 in its peer set.
How has Allwinner Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.7% against -32.2% for the median peer; over one year -30.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.