Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3316.HK Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd.3316.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Real Estate›Real Estate Development
Momentum neutral 56
Mkt cap
$734M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
28%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$838,191
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
144 days
30 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$20.82
1D-0.1%
1W+1.1%
1M-1.3%
3M-8.4%
6M-13.9%
YTD-12.4%
1Y-16.7%
ATR %2.2%
52w lowhigh22.7% off high

What Binjiang Service does

Employees: 16,853

Binjiang Service at a glance

Size Binjiang Service (3316.HK) is a Hong Kong Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $734M, the 666th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$20.82 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.9%, against -13.6% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.8%); the operating margin is 17.3% (peer median 6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 7.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.2× (3rd cheapest of 12).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 873316.HK 81
Six months, rebased to 100: Binjiang Service against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Binjiang Service financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$4.89BHK$4.45BHK$3.90BHK$3.11BHK$2.31B
Revenue growth—+14%+25%+35%—
Gross profitHK$1.04BHK$987MHK$906MHK$775MHK$694M
EBITDAHK$877MHK$840MHK$778MHK$659MHK$597M
Net incomeHK$685MHK$646MHK$593MHK$544MHK$479M
Free cash flowHK$727MHK$914MHK$653MHK$1.04BHK$1.34B
Capital expenditureHK$37.3MHK$37.8MHK$28.2MHK$27.5MHK$25.3M
Total debtn/aHK$2.65MHK$2.82MHK$4.43MHK$509,724

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Binjiang Service competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%-10%0%0000110173WARN002344000863FREN0007189347EMBDLMAHLIFEUOSIBULLSLTDZ25300917PLAZ-B0000360022850021463316.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Binjiang Service is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+250%+500%+750%0×20×40×60×0173WARN002344FRENMAHLIFEARHZ25300917PLAZ-B0000360022853316.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Binjiang Service is the large dot.

Binjiang Service competitors and peer comparison

How Binjiang Service compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Binjiang Service against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3316.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.3%-7.7%7th highest of 21
6-month return-13.9%-13.6%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-22.7%-30.7%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.2%+4.8%7th highest of 21
Operating margin17.3%6.4%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E7.8×24.2×3rd cheapest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Binjiang Service 3316.HKHong Kong$734M-14%+14%17%7.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Properties & Resources Development (Group) 000011.SZChina$733M+11%-16%3%n/an/an/a
K. Wah International 0173.HKHong Kong$740M-21%-17%0%61.3×n/an/a
Warteck Invest WARN.SWSwitzerland$741M-3%+7%73%23.9×n/an/a
Haining China Leather Market 002344.SZChina$744M-14%-1%7%56.9×n/an/a
Sanxiang Impression 000863.SZChina$722M-16%+48%-31%n/an/an/a
Fundamenta Real Estate FREN.SWSwitzerland$716M-1%+3%71%24.4×n/an/a
Suning Universal 000718.SZChina$754M-16%-23%-3%n/an/an/a
NIPPON KANZAI 9347.TJapan$714M+4%+7%6%n/an/an/a
Embassy Developments EMBDL.NSIndia$760M-26%-60%-48%n/an/an/a
Mahindra Lifespace Developers MAHLIFE.NSIndia$706M-10%+839%0%24.2×n/an/a
United Overseas Australia UOS.AXAustralia$765M-10%+13%37%n/an/an/a
Indiabulls IBULLSLTD.NSIndia$704M+48%+86%32%n/an/an/a
Archicom ARH.WAPoland$773M-2%+70%16%7.4×n/an/a
Yanlord Land Z25.SISingapore$696M-40%-55%8%11.5×n/an/a
Shenzhen SDG Service 300917.SZChina$695M-19%+7%5%30.1×n/an/a
Platzer Fastigheter PLAZ-B.STSweden$776M-12%+1%74%9.2×n/an/a
China Union 000036.SZChina$693M-41%+80%23%47.0×n/an/a
Shenzhen WorldUnion 002285.SZChina$693M-25%-22%-21%0.9×n/an/a
RiseSun Real Estate Development 002146.SZChina$691M-21%-48%-40%n/an/an/a
Robyg ROB.WAPoland$779Mn/a+63%15%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Binjiang Service's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shenzhen Properties & Resources Development (Group) (000011.SZ), K. Wah International (0173.HK), Warteck Invest (WARN.SW), Haining China Leather Market (002344.SZ), Sanxiang Impression (000863.SZ), Fundamenta Real Estate (FREN.SW), Suning Universal (000718.SZ), NIPPON KANZAI (9347.T).
Is Binjiang Service expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.8× against a peer median of 24.2×, 3rd cheapest of 12 in its peer set.
How has Binjiang Service stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.9% against -13.6% for the median peer; over one year -16.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.