Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3035.TW Faraday Technology Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Faraday Technology Corp.3035.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

ASIC/SoC design-services company providing chip design and silicon IP; began as a spin-off of chipmaker UMC.

Momentum neutral 48
Mkt cap
$1.26B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$52.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.1 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$160.50
1D-6.4%
1W-24.8%
1M-25.7%
3M-3.3%
6M-9.3%
YTD-5.9%
1Y-3.9%
ATR %8.6%
52w lowhigh34.5% off high

What Faraday Technology does

ASIC/SoC design-services company providing chip design and silicon IP; began as a spin-off of chipmaker UMC.

Is paid in three ways: project fees for designing a chip, licence fees on its pre-built circuit blocks (silicon IP), and revenue from managing chip production at a foundry for the customer. It began in 1993 as a spin-off from UMC, the Taiwan chipmaker, whose manufacturing processes much of its IP is built for.

Products and services

  • ASIC design services
  • Silicon IP licensing
  • Turnkey chip production management

Customers

  • Fabless companies and OEMs needing custom SoCs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Semiconductors
  • ASIC design services / IP licensing

What could go right

  • AI/HPC custom silicon demand
  • Advanced packaging design services

What could go wrong

  • Customer/project concentration
  • Long design-cycle revenue lumpiness

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how, customer qualification). Large library of silicon IP and close foundry ties (UMC especially) shorten customers' custom-chip design cycles.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan · Founded: 1993

Named competitors

Faraday Technology at a glance

Size Faraday Technology (3035.TW) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $1.26B, the 231st largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$160.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.3%, against -27.5% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 31.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.6%); the operating margin is 5.3% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 29.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.8× (4th most expensive of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points below its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263035.TW 88Peer median 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Faraday Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Faraday Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$12.4BNT$18.0BNT$11.1BNT$12.0BNT$13.1B
Revenue growth—+63%-8%-8%—
Gross profitNT$4.53BNT$3.96BNT$4.27BNT$4.82BNT$5.90B
EBITDANT$1.62BNT$1.48BNT$1.88BNT$2.46BNT$3.39B
Net incomeNT$789MNT$731MNT$1.04BNT$1.59BNT$2.45B
Free cash flowNT$1.82BNT$768MNT$2.75BNT$2.96BNT$1.11B
Capital expenditureNT$819MNT$663MNT$1.02BNT$666MNT$497M
Total debtNT$354MNT$326MNT$363MNT$324MNT$396M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Faraday Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-50%-25%0%WOLF7826558248113129008022078288112688726440110491930165860036068813806731034504979272606003035.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Faraday Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%20×40×78265582481131290782868872644011068813806731049793035.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Faraday Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%78265582481131290688726440110301658067310497927263035.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Faraday Technology is the large dot.

Faraday Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3035.TW vs 3443.TW vs 3661.TW vs 6526.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Faraday Technology 3035.TW$1.26B-9%-32%5%29.6×25.2%
Global Unichip 3443.TW$25.1B+29%+104%13%50.1×n/a
Alchip Technologies Limitd 3661.TW$7.35B-32%-51%23%14.4×n/a
Socionext 6526.T$1.78B-16%+21%5%21.1×n/a

How Faraday Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Faraday Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3035.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-25.7%-36.3%9th highest of 21
6-month return-9.3%-27.5%6th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-34.5%-54.2%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-31.8%+13.6%lowest of 20
Operating margin5.3%8.8%9th lowest of 20
Forward P/E29.6×22.8×4th most expensive of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.2%18.9%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+26.8%+23.7%5th highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.6 pp+3.4 pp5th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.1 pp-2.4 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA21.0×18.8×5th most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-5.4×-0.4×4th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Faraday Technology 3035.TWTaiwan$1.26B-9%-32%5%29.6×25.2%+26.8%
WOLF WOLFUnited States$1.26B-49%-12%-67%n/an/an/a
Furuya Metal 7826.TJapan$1.26B+7%+75%25%10.3×13.3%+24.2%
Karamtara Engineering KARAMTARA.NSIndia$1.28Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
UMS Integration 558.SISingapore$1.25B-27%+10%21%21.1×12.8%+8.8%
Pan Jit International 2481.TWTaiwan$1.25B+6%+9%9%15.0×24.5%+4.5%
TSE 131290.KSSouth Korea$1.29B-4%+37%22%12.0×11.2%+8.5%
Jeju Semiconductor 080220.KSSouth Korea$1.24B-4%+284%32%n/an/an/a
Innostar Service 7828.TWOTaiwan$1.29B-18%+117%43%53.4×n/an/a
Supreme Electronics 8112.TWTaiwan$1.24B-13%+80%3%n/an/an/a
LAPLACE Renewable Energy Technology 688726.SSChina$1.30B-36%-22%8%24.5×1.4%+62.8%
FADU 440110.KSSouth Korea$1.23B-58%+137%-9%44.5×43.1%+156.1%
Nuvoton Technology 4919.TWTaiwan$1.22B-46%0%-5%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen SOFARSOLAR 301658.SZChina$1.32B-41%+18%-1%n/a43.2%+37.3%
Jilin Sino-Microelectronics 600360.SSChina$1.21B-15%+11%3%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Qingyi Photomask 688138.SSChina$1.35B-7%+6%16%30.3×n/an/a
Hana Micron 067310.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-39%+54%14%6.1×0.4%+23.3%
Elite Advanced Laser 3450.TWTaiwan$1.36B-15%-2%16%n/an/an/a
Luxnet 4979.TWOTaiwan$1.36B-56%+14%19%29.3×34.7%+30.3%
Epiworld International 2726.HKHong Kong$1.17B-34%-21%-11%n/a42.8%+17.4%
Axera Semiconductor 0600.HKHong Kong$1.15B-34%+19%-135%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Faraday Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Global Unichip Corp (3443.TW), Alchip Technologies (3661.TW), Socionext (6526.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes WOLF (WOLF), Furuya Metal (7826.T), Karamtara Engineering (KARAMTARA.NS), UMS Integration (558.SI), Pan Jit International (2481.TW), TSE (131290.KS).
Is Faraday Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.6× against a peer median of 22.8×, 4th most expensive of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Faraday Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.3% against -27.5% for the median peer; over one year -3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.