Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 301218.SZ Zhejiang Whyis Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Zhejiang Whyis Technology Co., Ltd. Class A301218.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services
Momentum leader 100
Mkt cap
$1.27B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$176M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-15.9 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥85.75
1D-6.9%
1W+26.3%
1M+26.1%
3M+132.9%
6M+146.7%
YTD+262.7%
1Y+325.6%
ATR %9.9%
52w lowhigh10.2% off high

What Zhejiang Whyis Technology does

Employees: 434

Zhejiang Whyis Technology at a glance

Size Zhejiang Whyis Technology (301218.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $1.27B, the 1891st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥85.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 146.7%, against -3.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.8%); the operating margin is -15.5% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 10.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.4× (5th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.9 points below its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026301218.SZ 245Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Zhejiang Whyis Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Zhejiang Whyis Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥779MCN¥588MCN¥500MCN¥561MCN¥472M
Revenue growth—+18%-11%+19%—
Gross profitCN¥75.3MCN¥83.3MCN¥106MCN¥138MCN¥112M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥42.5M-CN¥2.36MCN¥21.5MCN¥17.2M
Net income-CN¥96.8M-CN¥26.6MCN¥9.74MCN¥32.9MCN¥37.4M
Free cash flow-CN¥183M-CN¥39.0M-CN¥39.7M-CN¥60.3M-CN¥33.9M
Capital expenditureCN¥104MCN¥56.4MCN¥80.0MCN¥84.8MCN¥32.8M
Total debtCN¥219MCN¥200MCN¥123MCN¥45.9MCN¥36.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Zhejiang Whyis Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%+150%-20%0%+20%688083002368BITTI603466601133300010BYIT47220005559682EFOR0856NA9446A688258VOYGE2E301218.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Zhejiang Whyis Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×10×20×30×688083002368BITTI603466601133300010BYIT4722ESDS000555QUBT446A688258VOYGE2E301218.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Zhejiang Whyis Technology is the large dot.

Zhejiang Whyis Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Zhejiang Whyis Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Zhejiang Whyis Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure301218.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+26.1%-1.6%highest of 21
6-month return+146.7%-3.4%highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-10.2%-38.3%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.9%+8.8%8th highest of 21
Operating margin-15.5%5.5%5th lowest of 21
EV / Sales10.9×4.4×5th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-15.9 pp-3.8 pp6th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Zhejiang Whyis Technology 301218.SZChina$1.27B+147%+23%-15%10.9×n/an/a
ZW Soft 688083.SSChina$1.27B-12%+2%-15%7.0×30.3%+14.5%
Taiji Computer 002368.SZChina$1.24B-23%-37%-27%2.0×4.1%-1.8%
Bittium BITTI.HEFinland$1.31B-3%+48%22%10.2×18.4%+8.8%
Shanghai Fengyuzhu Culture Technology 603466.SSChina$1.21B+40%-23%-4%5.2×n/an/a
Both Engineering Technology 601133.SSChina$1.34B-26%+14%5%1.6×24.3%+16.2%
Doushen (Beijing) Education & Technology 300010.SZChina$1.34B-15%+24%-31%7.7×n/an/a
Bytes Technology BYIT.LUnited Kingdom$1.36B+33%+10%27%3.9×3.1%-10.9%
Future 4722.TJapan$1.36B+59%+8%20%2.5×-5.4%+11.4%
ESDS Software Solution ESDS.NSIndia$1.38Bn/a+31%36%23.7×22.6%+22.4%
Digital China Information Service 000555.SZChina$1.39B-30%-8%0%0.9×n/an/a
DTS 9682.TJapan$1.14B+14%0%12%1.1×-9.1%+8.4%
Everforth EFORUnited States$1.41B+69%0%6%0.7×-1.5%+2.6%
VSTECS 0856.HKHong Kong$1.42B-30%+11%2%0.1×-12.2%+6.9%
Nagarro NA9.DEGermany$1.12B+78%+1%8%1.2×3.8%+18.4%
Quantum Computing QUBTUnited States$1.43B-34%+3,635%-775%51.1×n/an/a
Northsand,Inc 446A.TJapan$1.11B+99%+60%21%4.9×2.3%n/a
Jiangsu Eazytec 688258.SSChina$1.46B-33%0%28%28.8×40.1%+11.1%
Voyager Technologies VOYGUnited States$1.49B-19%+42%-82%8.3×n/an/a
E2E Networks E2E.NSIndia$1.06B+49%+252%28%17.9×n/an/a
Neusoft 600718.SSChina$1.51B-3%-5%-5%0.8×-6.1%+9.7%

Questions

Which companies are Zhejiang Whyis Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: ZW Soft (688083.SS), Taiji Computer (002368.SZ), Bittium (BITTI.HE), Shanghai Fengyuzhu Culture Technology (603466.SS), Both Engineering Technology (601133.SS), Doushen (Beijing) Education & Technology (300010.SZ), Bytes Technology (BYIT.L), Future (4722.T).
Is Zhejiang Whyis Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 10.9× against a peer median of 4.4×, 5th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Zhejiang Whyis Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +146.7% against -3.4% for the median peer; over one year +325.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.