Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300747.SZ Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies Co., Ltd. Class A300747.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Electrical Products

China's leading maker of fiber lasers used for industrial cutting, welding and marking machinery.

≈ A Chinese IPG PhotonicsMomentum leader 98
Mkt cap
$3.67B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
54%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$152M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
76.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.9 pp
WACC 13.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥43.89
1D+3.6%
1W+17.6%
1M+25.2%
3M+35.2%
6M+21.9%
YTD+62.4%
1Y+73.8%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh26.2% off high

What Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies does

China's leading maker of fiber lasers used for industrial cutting, welding and marking machinery.

Sells fiber lasers as a component to machine builders that fit them into cutting, welding and marking machines, so demand follows Chinese machinery makers' orders. With many machine builders buying on price, it competes through cost, and replacing foreign laser suppliers has been its route to market share.

In one line: A Chinese IPG Photonics.

Products and services

  • Continuous-wave fiber lasers
  • Pulsed fiber lasers
  • Laser marking sources

Customers

  • Sheet-metal cutting machine makers
  • Industrial equipment OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Laser technology
  • Fiber laser sources
  • Industrial cutting/welding/marking…

What could go right

  • Industrial automation and laser-cutting adoption
  • Import substitution vs IPG

What could go wrong

  • Laser-source price deflation
  • Customer concentration in machine OEMs

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how, cost advantage). Domestic scale and lower costs let it undercut IPG Photonics and win China's laser-cutting market.

Headquarters: Wuhan, Hubei, China · Founded: 2007 · Employees: 3,264

Named competitors

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies at a glance

Size Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies (300747.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $3.67B, the 701st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥43.89 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 21.9%, against -22.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +29.1%); the operating margin is 5.7% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 76.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.7× (2nd most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.9 points below its cost of capital (13.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300747.SZ 122Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.90BCN¥3.45BCN¥3.18BCN¥3.66BCN¥3.18B
Revenue growth—+8%-13%+15%—
Gross profitCN¥1.09BCN¥646MCN¥599MCN¥730MCN¥539M
EBITDAn/aCN¥336MCN¥323MCN¥412MCN¥160M
Net incomeCN¥296MCN¥162MCN¥134MCN¥217MCN¥40.9M
Free cash flow-CN¥28.6MCN¥113MCN¥404MCN¥114M-CN¥86.2M
Capital expenditureCN¥198MCN¥111MCN¥107MCN¥172MCN¥374M
Total debtCN¥359MCN¥904MCN¥1.09BCN¥1.37BCN¥1.14B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%60372800248768867639310062606883490004003004380005006005174626300570KEI1133301606ROSE300747.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×6037280024876886763931006260688349000400DHOOTTRANS3004386005173005701133301606300747.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies is the large dot.

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300747.SZ vs IPGP vs 002008.SZ vs 300080.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies 300747.SZ$3.67B+22%+16%6%76.8×n/a
IPG Photonics IPGP$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%
Han's Laser Technology Industry 002008.SZ$7.97B-48%+59%12%19.1×19.6%
Henan Yicheng New Energy 300080.SZ$1.05B-17%-13%-21%n/an/a

How Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300747.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+25.2%-11.3%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+21.9%-22.6%2nd highest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-26.2%-42.3%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.3%+29.1%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin5.7%9.6%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E76.8×21.7×2nd most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.9 pp+0.5 pp5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies 300747.SZChina$3.67B+22%+16%6%76.8×n/an/a
Shanghai Moons Electrical 603728.SSChina$3.66B-1%+22%4%183.9×n/an/a
Dajin Heavy Industry 002487.SZChina$3.71B-60%-2%19%19.6×n/an/a
Hainan Jinpan Smart Technology 688676.SSChina$3.75B-38%+12%10%29.4×28.5%+24.7%
CALB 3931.HKHong Kong$3.57B-59%+80%7%8.1×n/an/a
LS 006260.KSSouth Korea$3.51B-62%+30%4%8.0×n/an/a
Sany Renewable Energy 688349.SSChina$3.50B-22%+30%2%21.7×n/an/a
XJ Electric 000400.SZChina$3.86B0%-8%6%23.5×n/an/a
Dhoot Transmission DHOOTTRANS.NSIndia$3.46Bn/a+31%13%52.6×n/an/a
Guangzhou Great Power Energy & Technology 300438.SZChina$3.90B-50%+125%7%11.7×9.7%+26.8%
Luoyang Bearing 301699.SZChina$3.45Bn/a+29%11%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Hfc 301716.SZChina$3.93Bn/a+114%44%n/a45.3%n/a
Beijing Sifang Automation 601126.SSChina$3.94B-44%+9%9%27.8×25.3%+16.3%
Gaon Cable 000500.KSSouth Korea$3.97B+50%+32%3%n/an/an/a
State Grid Yingda 600517.SSChina$4.01B-21%+8%22%10.2×-18.5%+8.1%
Taiyo 4626.TJapan$3.36B-5%+18%25%17.0×5.0%+11.2%
T&S Communications 300570.SZChina$3.36B-25%+40%18%47.3×43.8%+21.8%
KEI Industries KEI.NSIndia$4.03B-22%+25%10%33.9×n/an/a
Harbin Electric 1133.HKHong Kong$3.27B-54%+13%7%6.2×n/an/a
Ugreen 301606.SZChina$4.13B-23%+50%9%25.4×n/an/a
Rosebank Industries ROSE.LUnited Kingdom$4.15B-12%n/a13%18.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: IPG Photonics (IPGP), Han's Laser Technology (002008.SZ), Chuangxin Laser (300080.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Moons Electrical (603728.SS), Dajin Heavy Industry (002487.SZ), Hainan Jinpan Smart Technology (688676.SS), CALB (3931.HK), LS (006260.KS), Sany Renewable Energy (688349.SS).
Is Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 76.8× against a peer median of 21.7×, 2nd most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Wuhan Raycus Fiber Laser Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +21.9% against -22.6% for the median peer; over one year +73.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.