Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300682.SZ Longshine Technology Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Longshine Technology Group Co., Ltd. Class A300682.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese power-utility software vendor for grid customer-service/metering systems, which also runs a large EV-charging platform.

Momentum laggard 19
Mkt cap
$1.39B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
53%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-14.2 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
+43 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥8.82
1D-0.6%
1W+8.5%
1M+2.0%
3M-24.3%
6M-35.3%
YTD-42.0%
1Y-51.0%
ATR %3.9%
52w lowhigh57.4% off high

What Longshine Technology does

Chinese power-utility software vendor for grid customer-service/metering systems, which also runs a large EV-charging platform.

Earns software and service fees from power utilities, mostly project work for the large grid companies, and a service fee on charging sessions paid through its aggregator app, which connects third-party charging stations to drivers. The charging side follows the number of sessions, so EV usage matters.

Products and services

  • Power-grid customer service/metering software
  • EV charging platform (aggregation network)

Customers

  • Power grid/utility companies
  • EV drivers/charging operators via its platform

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Utility software + EV charging
  • Utility IT + EV charging network…

What could go right

  • EV adoption driving charging-network volume
  • Utility digitalization

What could go wrong

  • Utility IT-budget dependence
  • EV-charging price competition

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, network effects). Entrenched utility-software relationships plus a large aggregated EV-charging network with two-sided network effects.

Headquarters: Wuxi, China · Employees: 5,202

Named competitors

Longshine Technology at a glance

Size Longshine Technology (300682.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $1.39B, the 1747th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥8.82 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 35.3%, against -11.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.4%); the operating margin is -8.6% (peer median 1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 25.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.5× (4th most expensive of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 49% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +43 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.2 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86300682.SZ 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Longshine Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Longshine Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥4.53BCN¥4.50BCN¥4.46BCN¥4.71BCN¥4.54B
Revenue growth—+1%-5%+4%—
Gross profitCN¥1.77BCN¥1.75BCN¥1.72BCN¥1.81BCN¥1.68B
EBITDAn/aCN¥166M-CN¥61.7MCN¥513MCN¥420M
Net income-CN¥269MCN¥105M-CN¥250MCN¥604MCN¥514M
Free cash flowCN¥65.9MCN¥272MCN¥241MCN¥462MCN¥38.4M
Capital expenditureCN¥182MCN¥229MCN¥346MCN¥269MCN¥287M
Total debtCN¥1.07BCN¥858MCN¥1.16BCN¥485MCN¥1.14B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Longshine Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%PTEC300624LSPD600446ZENSARTECHIBTA688031ALKTVYXEVCMNN08004628706214AMAGI263750300682.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Longshine Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×50×100×150×PTECLSPD600446ZENSARTECH300768VYXEVCM581A6214AMAGI263750300682.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Longshine Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%PTECLSPDZENSARTECHIBTAALKT300768EVCM581A46287062149759300682.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Longshine Technology is the large dot.

Longshine Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300682.SZ vs 002063.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Longshine Technology 300682.SZ$1.39B-35%+7%-9%25.9×49.4%
YGsoft 002063.SZ$1.51B-16%+5%13%31.0×16.3%

How Longshine Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Longshine Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300682.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%-0.4%5th highest of 21
6-month return-35.3%-11.4%5th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-57.4%-39.2%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.4%+9.4%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin-8.6%1.3%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E25.9×15.5×4th most expensive of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)49.4%11.6%most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.0%+13.1%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+43.4 pp-18.7 ppmost demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.2 pp-10.5 pp8th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Longshine Technology 300682.SZChina$1.39B-35%+7%-9%25.9×49.4%+6.0%
Playtech PTEC.LUnited Kingdom$1.39B+7%-54%0%11.4×-6.0%-7.4%
Wondershare Technology 300624.SZChina$1.38B-25%-8%-12%n/an/an/a
Lightspeed Commerce LSPD.TOCanada$1.38B+9%+11%-9%14.4×13.5%+42.0%
Shenzhen Kingdom Sci-tech 600446.SSChina$1.41B-27%-22%-6%177.0×n/an/a
Zensar Technologies ZENSARTECH.NSIndia$1.37B+9%+9%14%16.9×13.4%+8.5%
Ibotta IBTAUnited States$1.37B+19%+2%-3%n/a-1.1%+17.6%
Transwarp Technology Shanghai 688031.SSChina$1.35B-45%+27%-49%n/an/an/a
Alkami Technology ALKTUnited States$1.44B-25%+24%-5%13.1×12.6%+31.7%
Hangzhou DPTech Technology 300768.SZChina$1.35B-19%-3%5%42.3×34.9%+6.5%
NCR Voyix VYXUnited States$1.35B+17%-5%7%9.9×n/an/a
Mech-Mind Robotics Technologies 9615.HKHong Kong$1.34Bn/a+45%-41%n/an/an/a
EverCommerce EVCMUnited States$1.45B-31%-7%13%11.7×11.6%+11.8%
NextNav NNUnited States$1.45B-56%-36%-1,900%n/an/an/a
GO Inc. 581A.TJapan$1.45Bn/a+32%17%21.9×34.7%+31.9%
WeRide 0800.HKHong Kong$1.33B-47%+109%-221%n/an/an/a
SHIFT UP 462870.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-4%-12%56%13.3×-12.9%+59.7%
Systex 6214.TWTaiwan$1.46B+54%+34%3%16.6×-12.4%+13.1%
Amagi Media Labs AMAGI.NSIndia$1.32B+30%+30%3%60.2×n/an/a
NSD 9759.TJapan$1.32B+12%+10%16%16.6×-10.9%+12.2%
PearlAbyss 263750.KSSouth Korea$1.47B-44%+114%40%7.1×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Longshine Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: YGsoft (002063.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Playtech (PTEC.L), Wondershare Technology (300624.SZ), Lightspeed Commerce (LSPD.TO), Shenzhen Kingdom Sci-tech (600446.SS), Zensar Technologies (ZENSARTECH.NS), Ibotta (IBTA).
Is Longshine Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.9× against a peer median of 15.5×, 4th most expensive of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 49% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +43 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Longshine Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -35.3% against -11.4% for the median peer; over one year -51.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.