Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300523.SZ Beijing Global Safety Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing Global Safety Technology Co., Ltd. Class A300523.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum neutral 48
Mkt cap
$855M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
46%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
34.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-12.9 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥18.85
1D-1.4%
1W+2.5%
1M-18.7%
3M-5.0%
6M-14.0%
YTD-21.2%
1Y-23.1%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh40.0% off high

What Beijing Global Safety Technology does

Employees: 1,572

Beijing Global Safety Technology at a glance

Size Beijing Global Safety Technology (300523.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $855M, the 2606th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥18.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.0%, against -14.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 28.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.4%); the operating margin is -10.5% (peer median 8.0%).

Valuation It trades at 34.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.4× (4th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.9 points below its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300523.SZ 85Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing Global Safety Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing Global Safety Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.57BCN¥1.46BCN¥1.39BCN¥2.25BCN¥2.38B
Revenue growth—+5%-38%-6%—
Gross profitCN¥414MCN¥403MCN¥325MCN¥809MCN¥964M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥126M-CN¥270MCN¥168MCN¥87.6M
Net income-CN¥207M-CN¥221M-CN¥322MCN¥79.6MCN¥6.89M
Free cash flow-CN¥175M-CN¥15.7M-CN¥196M-CN¥655MCN¥718M
Capital expenditureCN¥3.66MCN¥4.13MCN¥17.0MCN¥45.7MCN¥23.8M
Total debtCN¥631MCN¥1.13BCN¥930MCN¥817MCN¥584M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing Global Safety Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%DSP603776300075PAR300525477660338332813037383009254180300043FQTBKSY215APRLHSTMQTCOM300523.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing Global Safety Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%20×40×DSP300075PAR300525477660338337383009254180FQT002123215APRLHSTMQTCOM300523.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing Global Safety Technology is the large dot.

Beijing Global Safety Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing Global Safety Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing Global Safety Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300523.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-18.7%+0.4%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-14.0%-14.9%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.0%-36.1%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+28.9%+20.4%4th highest of 21
Operating margin-10.5%8.0%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E34.9×25.4×4th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.9 pp-0.0 pp7th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Beijing Global Safety Technology 300523.SZChina$855M-14%+29%-11%34.9×n/an/a
Viant Technology DSPUnited States$854M+7%+22%36%50.8×-4.6%+15.8%
Youon Technology 603776.SSChina$852M+3%+34%-28%n/a16.7%-14.0%
Beijing eGOVA 300075.SZChina$851M-29%-5%-102%25.4×n/an/a
PAR Technology PARUnited States$850M+43%+19%-10%17.7×n/an/a
Fujian Boss Software 300525.SZChina$861M-24%-5%8%26.4×5.4%+12.1%
Cybozu 4776.TJapan$862M+43%+20%27%16.8×-2.8%+19.0%
Fujian Apex Software 603383.SSChina$848M-15%-8%25%27.8×16.4%+10.7%
Lunit 328130.KSSouth Korea$846M-25%+24%-76%n/an/an/a
Vobile 3738.HKHong Kong$844M-17%+20%13%18.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Farben Information Technology 300925.SZChina$867M-27%+22%1%45.7×n/an/a
Appier 4180.TJapan$869M+50%+28%7%30.7×19.5%+37.3%
Rastar 300043.SZChina$870M-20%-43%20%n/a10.6%+3.7%
Frequentis FQT.DEGermany$870M-15%+34%9%19.0×-7.6%+14.1%
BlackSky Technology BKSYUnited States$873M-46%+4%-43%n/an/an/a
Montnets Cloud Technology 002123.SZChina$875M-21%-30%-11%22.8×n/an/a
Beijing Shenzhou Aerospace Software Technology 688562.SSChina$878M-21%+24%-5%n/an/an/a
Timee 215A.TJapan$878M+9%+56%18%21.0×0.0%+89.1%
Propel PRL.TOCanada$830M+28%+24%17%7.6×n/an/a
HealthStream HSTMUnited States$884M+21%+10%8%38.7×14.6%+4.4%
Qt Group Plc QTCOM.HEFinland$887M+62%+17%16%26.8×16.4%+22.2%

Questions

Which companies are Beijing Global Safety Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Viant Technology (DSP), Youon Technology (603776.SS), Beijing eGOVA (300075.SZ), PAR Technology (PAR), Fujian Boss Software (300525.SZ), Cybozu (4776.T), Fujian Apex Software (603383.SS), Lunit (328130.KS).
Is Beijing Global Safety Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 34.9× against a peer median of 25.4×, 4th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Beijing Global Safety Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.0% against -14.9% for the median peer; over one year -23.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.