Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2923.TW Sino Horizon Holdings Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Sino Horizon Holdings Ltd.2923.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Taiwanese real estate developer (formerly a construction firm) building residential and commercial projects.

Momentum leader 94
Mkt cap
$1.65B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
3%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$137,990
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · TWDNT$31.40
1D-1.1%
1W+16.3%
1M+29.5%
3M+5.5%
6M+40.5%
YTD+57.0%
1Y+56.6%
ATR %6.8%
52w lowhigh28.9% off high

What Sino Horizon does

Taiwanese real estate developer (formerly a construction firm) building residential and commercial projects.

Products and services

  • Residential development
  • Commercial development

Customers

  • Homebuyers
  • Commercial tenants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real Estate
  • Homebuilding
  • Residential development

What could go right

  • Taiwan property market cycles

What could go wrong

  • Land cost inflation
  • Interest-rate sensitive demand

Moat: none (scale). Small/mid-tier developer without a scale or brand edge over larger peers.

Headquarters: Taipei, Taiwan

Named competitors

Sino Horizon at a glance

Size Sino Horizon (2923.TW) is a Taiwan Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $1.65B, the 191st largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$31.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 40.5%, against -8.9% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 63.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.4%); the operating margin is 46.7% (peer median 15.1%).

Relative performance

10012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262923.TW 128Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Sino Horizon against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sino Horizon financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$8.49BNT$5.80BNT$8.56BNT$11.7BNT$9.22B
Revenue growth—-32%-27%+27%—
Gross profitNT$4.55BNT$2.88BNT$4.99BNT$6.49BNT$5.45B
EBITDANT$4.03BNT$2.44BNT$4.58BNT$5.98BNT$4.94B
Net income-NT$5.48B-NT$6.30BNT$759MNT$565MNT$593M
Free cash flow-NT$1.52B-NT$2.21B-NT$3.29BNT$2.96BNT$3.87B
Capital expenditureNT$156MNT$53.0MNT$9.29MNT$193MNT$64.8M
Total debtNT$53.9BNT$52.1BNT$57.5BNT$48.3BNT$40.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sino Horizon competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%+20%JDANHIAGALTRA0017000656139660064828693900YCPSF176015120817GRI2923.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sino Horizon is the large dot.

Sino Horizon competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2923.TW vs 2542.TW vs 5522.TW vs 2520.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Sino Horizon 2923.TW$1.65B+40%+63%47%n/an/a
Highwealth Construction 2542.TW$2.42B-5%+111%25%n/an/a
Farglory Land Development 5522.TW$1.34B-18%+164%26%1.9×-13.6%
Kindom Development 2520.TW$600M+15%+10%16%1.1×-13.2%

How Sino Horizon compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sino Horizon against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2923.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+29.5%-0.4%highest of 21
6-month return+40.5%-8.9%highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-28.9%-18.5%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+63.0%+1.4%4th highest of 20
Operating margin46.7%15.1%8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Sino Horizon 2923.TWTaiwan$1.65B+40%+63%47%n/an/an/a
Jeudan A/S JDAN.CODenmark$1.66B0%+3%62%n/an/an/a
HIAG Immobilien HIAG.SWSwitzerland$1.64B-2%+96%50%n/an/an/a
Altra Fastigheter ALTRA.STSweden$1.64B+18%-2%64%n/an/an/a
New World Development 0017.HKHong Kong$1.68B-46%+10%-8%n/an/an/a
Jinke Property 000656.SZChina$1.68B-24%-87%-1,642%n/an/an/a
Realia Business RLIA.MCSpain$1.68B-3%+82%41%n/an/an/a
Greater Bay Area AI Computing Tech 1396.HKHong Kong$1.70B-41%+76%-6%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone 600648.SSChina$1.60B-15%-3%8%n/an/an/a
Dom Development DOM.WAPoland$1.59B-6%+14%24%n/an/an/a
Greentown Service 2869.HKHong Kong$1.74B-9%+13%7%n/an/an/a
Greentown China 3900.HKHong Kong$1.74B-48%+1%3%n/an/an/a
Castellana Properties Socimi YCPS.MCSpain$1.57B-4%+59%63%n/an/an/a
GuocoLand F17.SISingapore$1.75B-16%-24%7%n/an/an/a
China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park Development 601512.SSChina$1.75B-23%-32%22%n/an/an/a
Yuexiu Property 0123.HKHong Kong$1.55B-30%-21%0%n/an/an/a
China Jinmao 0817.HKHong Kong$1.77B-45%-8%5%n/an/an/a
PPI Public Property Invest PUBLI.STSweden$1.78Bn/an/a70%n/an/an/a
GreatTown 600094.SSChina$1.51B-2%-36%4%n/an/an/a
Intershop ISN.SWSwitzerland$1.82B-9%+5%79%n/an/an/a
Grainger GRI.LUnited Kingdom$1.83B+19%-23%49%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Sino Horizon's main competitors?
Named competitors: Highwealth Construction (2542.TW), Farglory Land Development (5522.TW), Kindom Construction (2520.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jeudan A/S (JDAN.CO), HIAG Immobilien (HIAG.SW), Altra Fastigheter (ALTRA.ST), New World Development (0017.HK), Jinke Property (000656.SZ), Realia Business (RLIA.MC).
How has Sino Horizon stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +40.5% against -8.9% for the median peer; over one year +56.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.