Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 281820.KS Kctech Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Kctech Co., Ltd.281820.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Korean maker of CMP (chemical-mechanical polishing) equipment and slurry/consumables used in semiconductor wafer fabs.

Momentum weak 29
Mkt cap
$770M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$16.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.4 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
-1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
137 days
23 Mar 2027
Close · KRW₩52,800
1D-8.0%
1W-39.7%
1M-57.1%
3M-24.8%
6M-13.9%
YTD+33.2%
1Y+34.0%
ATR %18.1%
52w lowhigh60.6% off high

What Kctech does

Korean maker of CMP (chemical-mechanical polishing) equipment and slurry/consumables used in semiconductor wafer fabs.

Sells polishing tools as large capital orders that follow its two big Korean chipmaker customers' investment plans, then earns more steadily from consumables and service. Because Samsung and SK hynix provide most demand, its fortunes track Korean memory-chip spending.

Products and services

  • CMP equipment
  • CMP slurry
  • Wafer cleaning equipment

Customers

  • Samsung Electronics
  • SK hynix

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductor equipment
  • CMP equipment and consumables
  • Wafer polishing process

What could go right

  • Memory/logic capex upcycle

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration
  • Capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, process know-how). Qualified domestic CMP supplier reducing reliance on foreign polishing equipment/consumables.

Headquarters: Cheonan, South Korea · Employees: 782

Named competitors

Kctech at a glance

Size Kctech (281820.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $770M, the 273rd largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩52,800 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.9%, against -34.0% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.3%); the operating margin is 20.3% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 8.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.2× (3rd cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.4 points above its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026281820.KS 79Peer median 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Kctech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kctech financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩495B₩383B₩385B₩287B₩378B
Revenue growth—-1%+34%-24%—
Gross profitn/a₩140B₩122B₩96.2B₩129B
EBITDAn/a₩76.9B₩66.1B₩47.9B₩75.7B
Net income₩100B₩53.4B₩52.7B₩31.7B₩55.4B
Free cash flown/a₩32.6B₩89.8B₩13.7B₩41.6B
Capital expendituren/a₩28.6B₩12.0B₩13.7B₩15.0B
Total debtn/a₩2.02B₩2.63B₩4.17B₩4.37B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kctech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-60%-40%-20%0%68809367403413300128CWR4967617660306830118000203624286883286887766282ET6883126412SCANFL281820.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kctech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×30×40×688093341349676176242868877662826632ET6883126412SCANFL281820.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kctech is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%6880931770301180242868832862826632ET6883126412SCANFL281820.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kctech is the large dot.

Kctech competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (281820.KS vs AMAT vs 6361.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kctech 281820.KS$770M-14%+19%20%8.7×2.8%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
Ebara 6361.T$9.28B-40%+9%11%14.5×n/a

How Kctech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kctech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure281820.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-57.1%-15.8%lowest of 21
6-month return-13.9%-34.0%6th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-60.6%-49.4%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.9%+9.3%8th highest of 21
Operating margin20.3%5.5%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.7×13.2×3rd cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.8%7.0%4th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.7%+6.3%3rd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-0.9 pp+0.8 pp6th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.4 pp-1.4 pp6th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kctech 281820.KSSouth Korea$770M-14%+19%20%8.7×2.8%+3.7%
Suzhou Shihua New Material Technology 688093.SSChina$772M-43%-26%32%9.5×7.0%+27.0%
Japan Display 6740.TJapan$773M-74%-25%-9%n/an/an/a
Foxsemicon Integrated Technology 3413.TWTaiwan$778M-29%+16%13%8.6×n/an/a
Suzhou Jinfu Technology 300128.SZChina$781M-38%+33%-12%n/an/an/a
Ceres Power CWR.LUnited Kingdom$758M-63%-23%-125%n/an/an/a
Team 4967.TWTaiwan$783M-7%+91%35%39.4×n/an/a
Radiant Opto-Electronics 6176.TWTaiwan$795M-15%-11%9%9.5×n/an/a
DKE 1770.HKHong Kong$796Mn/a+35%5%n/a17.5%+9.6%
Beken 603068.SSChina$810M0%+35%1%n/an/an/a
Suzhou Wanxiang Technology 301180.SZChina$724M-32%+8%2%n/a25.2%+4.4%
LianChuang Electronic Technology 002036.SZChina$818M-42%-32%-25%n/an/an/a
Thinking Electronic Industrial 2428.TWTaiwan$721M0%+11%23%11.2×0.8%+6.3%
Shenzhen S-king Intelligent Equipment 688328.SSChina$718M-7%+31%11%n/a29.2%+0.7%
Guoguang Electric Co., Ltd.Chengdu 688776.SSChina$709M-46%-38%-89%30.3×n/an/a
AcBel Polytech 6282.TWTaiwan$838M-35%+14%3%22.5×15.7%+8.6%
JVCKENWOOD 6632.TJapan$694M-34%+2%7%7.0×-17.0%+5.5%
Evertz Technologies ET.TOCanada$689M-21%+4%13%15.1×5.0%+8.5%
Shenzhen Yanmade Technology 688312.SSChina$682M-56%+1%17%25.1×26.6%+12.0%
Chicony Power Technology 6412.TWTaiwan$680M-38%+62%-128%9.9×-5.2%-0.2%
Scanfil SCANFL.HEFinland$877M-7%+19%6%16.2×6.9%+6.0%

Questions

Who are Kctech's main competitors?
Named competitors: Applied Materials (AMAT), Ebara Corporation (6361.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzhou Shihua New Material Technology (688093.SS), Japan Display (6740.T), Foxsemicon Integrated Technology (3413.TW), Suzhou Jinfu Technology (300128.SZ), Ceres Power (CWR.L), Team (4967.TW).
Is Kctech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.7× against a peer median of 13.2×, 3rd cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kctech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.9% against -34.0% for the median peer; over one year +34.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.