Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 255A.T Gltechno Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Gltechno Holdings, Inc.255A.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$326M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.84M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.4 pp
WACC 14.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,940
1D-3.9%
1W-19.3%
1M-30.8%
3M-31.9%
6M-24.1%
YTD+26.5%
1Y+29.0%
ATR %6.8%
52w lowhigh44.8% off high

What Gltechno does

No business profile yet.

Gltechno at a glance

Size Gltechno (255A.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $326M, the 1308th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,940 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.1%, against -24.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.2%); the operating margin is 16.0% (peer median 2.9%).

Valuation It trades at 8.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.3× (2nd cheapest of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points below its cost of capital (14.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 73255A.T 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Gltechno against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Gltechno financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024
Revenue¥48.8B¥47.2B¥43.3B
Revenue growth—+9%—
Gross profit¥17.2B¥16.3B¥15.1B
EBITDA¥9.71B¥8.96B¥8.17B
Net income¥5.76B¥5.36B¥4.06B
Free cash flown/a¥134M¥3.45B
Capital expendituren/a¥4.46B¥3.11B
Total debt¥9.07B¥7.48B¥5.35B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Gltechno competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%-40%-20%0%300334611834493013146887180027676885015284WINDMACHIN6881136883354532688529002381MEC0536100026306008546438255A.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Gltechno is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×6118344968850152844532002381MEC0536106438255A.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Gltechno is the large dot.

Gltechno competitors and peer comparison

How Gltechno compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Gltechno against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure255A.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-30.8%-14.0%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-24.1%-24.5%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-44.8%-38.6%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.1%+17.2%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin16.0%2.9%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.0×12.3×2nd cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.7%-1.3%2nd most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.4 pp-4.2 pp10th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.4×10.4×3rd cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×-0.9×4th most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Gltechno 255A.TJapan$326M-24%+9%16%8.0×9.7%n/a
Tianjin MOTIMO Membrane Technology 300334.SZChina$326M-11%+37%-10%n/an/an/a
Aida Engineering,Ltd 6118.TJapan$326M-13%-2%6%12.3×-19.0%+6.2%
Technoflex 3449.TJapan$326M-41%+22%19%11.0×3.0%+6.8%
Zhuhai Kles Technology 301314.SZChina$326M-18%+22%0%n/an/an/a
Wave Cyber (Shanghai) 688718.SSChina$327M-26%+16%13%n/a35.0%+5.9%
HANGZHOU INNOVER TECHNOLOGY 002767.SZChina$325M-30%+25%1%n/an/an/a
Qingdao Daneng Environmental Protection Equipment 688501.SSChina$323M-29%-15%9%14.1×n/an/a
JPP 5284.TWTaiwan$323M-47%+50%22%10.1×-0.6%+21.0%
Windsor Machines WINDMACHIN.NSIndia$322M-7%+36%0%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Liance Electromechanical Technology 688113.SSChina$321M-23%+10%18%n/a7.9%+6.7%
Shanghai CEO Technology 688335.SSChina$321M-55%+29%-8%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Intelligent Precision Instrument 301512.SZChina$320M-20%0%5%n/an/an/a
Rechi Precision 4532.TWTaiwan$332M-2%-9%5%14.8×-3.8%+1.0%
Dalian Haosen Intelligent Manufacturing 688529.SSChina$333M-33%-19%-83%n/a-4.2%+7.4%
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber 002381.SZChina$333M-19%-4%1%6.6×5.7%+8.1%
Mayville Engineering MECUnited States$335M-52%+15%-1%27.2×n/an/a
Protec 053610.KSSouth Korea$316M-42%+47%25%8.5×n/an/a
China Western Power Industrial 002630.SZChina$336M-5%-53%-24%n/a-2.0%-5.3%
Jiangsu Chunlan Refrigerating Equipment Stock 600854.SSChina$337M-20%+41%-20%n/a-10.7%-17.0%
Symtek Automation Asia 6438.TWTaiwan$314M-30%+18%9%14.9×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Gltechno's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Tianjin MOTIMO Membrane Technology (300334.SZ), Aida Engineering,Ltd (6118.T), Technoflex (3449.T), Zhuhai Kles Technology (301314.SZ), Wave Cyber (Shanghai) (688718.SS), HANGZHOU INNOVER TECHNOLOGY (002767.SZ), Qingdao Daneng Environmental Protection Equipment (688501.SS), JPP (5284.TW).
Is Gltechno expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.0× against a peer median of 12.3×, 2nd cheapest of 10 in its peer set.
How has Gltechno stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.1% against -24.5% for the median peer; over one year +29.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.