Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2373.TW Aurora CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aurora Corporation2373.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors
Momentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$342M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
42%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$67,798
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+1.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · TWDNT$50.50
1D-2.1%
1W-2.1%
1M-3.8%
3M-5.6%
6M-10.9%
YTD-10.1%
1Y-11.4%
ATR %1.7%
52w lowhigh14.4% off high

What Aurora does

No business profile yet.

Aurora at a glance

Size Aurora (2373.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $342M, the 604th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$50.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 10.9%, against -6.0% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.3%); the operating margin is 7.1% (peer median 3.6%).

Valuation It trades at 1.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.6× (7th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 932373.TW 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Aurora against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aurora financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$10.6BNT$10.7BNT$11.3BNT$11.5BNT$12.6B
Revenue growth—-5%-2%-8%—
Gross profitNT$4.26BNT$4.38BNT$4.51BNT$4.78BNT$4.99B
EBITDANT$1.55BNT$1.65BNT$1.64BNT$1.86BNT$2.08B
Net incomeNT$837MNT$871MNT$959MNT$1.09BNT$1.31B
Free cash flowNT$1.36BNT$1.19BNT$1.02BNT$1.67BNT$686M
Capital expenditureNT$162MNT$225MNT$594MNT$496MNT$531M
Total debtNT$5.25BNT$5.70BNT$5.70BNT$5.94BNT$5.80B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aurora competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%-10%0%0001593153TWM8065TEQ2908CHSCP110480813176600250603895248070BAPMEKO9274600753712874800000682373.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aurora is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0×2×4×0001593153TWM8065TEQ2908CHSCP11046002506038956007530000682373.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aurora is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%3153TWMTEQ2908CHSCP80813176600250BAPMEKO9274712874800000682373.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Aurora is the large dot.

Aurora competitors and peer comparison

How Aurora compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aurora against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2373.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.8%-10.9%8th highest of 21
6-month return-10.9%-6.0%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.4%-18.9%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.1%+11.3%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin7.1%3.6%5th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.1×0.6×7th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.4%-1.8%6th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)-3.8%+6.1%3rd lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-0.6 pp-10.7 pp4th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.9 pp-0.4 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.3×7.0×6th most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×2.3×6th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Aurora 2373.TWTaiwan$342M-11%-3%7%1.1×-4.4%-3.8%
Xinjiang International Industry 000159.SZChina$342M-27%+37%4%1.6×n/an/a
Yashima Denki 3153.TJapan$339M-15%+13%10%0.4×-10.6%+4.7%
Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure TWM.TOCanada$337M+43%+16%6%0.7×-3.8%+6.1%
Sato Sho-ji 8065.TJapan$331M-10%+5%3%0.3×n/an/a
Teqnion TEQ.STSweden$330M+21%+12%11%2.0×2.4%+22.3%
Test Rite International 2908.TWTaiwan$330M+4%-1%2%0.8×9.7%-4.3%
CHS Inc 8 % Cum Red Pfd Registered CHSCPUnited States$316M-8%+11%1%0.1×-11.0%+0.4%
APAC Resources 1104.HKHong Kong$313M-35%+197%54%0.7×n/an/a
Kanaden 8081.TJapan$307M0%+13%4%0.2×-15.6%+6.1%
Sanyo Trading 3176.TJapan$381M+33%+7%5%0.3×-5.2%+11.8%
Nanjing Business & Tourism 600250.SSChina$388M-24%0%9%4.0×12.7%-4.9%
Shanghai Tianyong Engineering 603895.SSChina$393M-15%+28%3%5.1×n/an/a
Solum 248070.KSSouth Korea$398M-42%+16%4%0.5×n/an/a
Bapcor BAP.AXAustralia$399M+66%-3%2%0.5×7.2%+1.8%
Meko MEKO.STSweden$406M-5%-1%2%0.6×2.2%+9.4%
Kpp 9274.TJapan$411M+13%-1%2%0.3×-0.7%+8.6%
Fujian Haiqin Energy 600753.SSChina$412M-7%+193%5%1.1×n/an/a
UNISOL 7128.TJapan$420M+31%-1%2%0.3×-2.9%+24.5%
Suzuden 7480.TJapan$271M+97%+26%6%0.6×-6.2%+0.3%
Shenzhen Huakong Seg 000068.SZChina$432M-13%-52%-3%8.0×11.9%+30.6%

Questions

Which companies are Aurora's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Xinjiang International Industry (000159.SZ), Yashima Denki (3153.T), Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure (TWM.TO), Sato Sho-ji (8065.T), Teqnion (TEQ.ST), Test Rite International (2908.TW), CHS Inc 8 % Cum Red Pfd Registered (CHSCP), APAC Resources (1104.HK).
Is Aurora expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.1× against a peer median of 0.6×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Aurora stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -10.9% against -6.0% for the median peer; over one year -11.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.