Loading…

ISC Co095340.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Korean maker of silicone-rubber semiconductor test sockets, the world's leading supplier of this chip-testing component.

≈ A small, single-niche Korean component maker — the world leader in silicone-rubber test soMomentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$1.82B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+20.2 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · KRW₩121,000
1D-14.1%
1W-22.3%
1M-40.2%
3M-8.0%
6M-50.1%
YTD+8.9%
1Y+52.5%
ATR %12.1%
52w lowhigh58.6% off high

What ISC does

Korean maker of silicone-rubber semiconductor test sockets, the world's leading supplier of this chip-testing component.

Sells sockets as consumables that wear out in use and are bought again, so revenue follows chip test volumes and new chip designs, which each need a matching socket. SKC, the SK-group materials company, became its majority owner.

In one line: A small, single-niche Korean component maker — the world leader in silicone-rubber test so.

Products and services

  • Silicone rubber test sockets
  • Pogo-pin sockets
  • Burn-in test sockets/testers

Customers

  • global memory/logic chipmakers and OSAT test house

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer-fab back-end / test components
  • Silicone-rubber test sockets, pogo-pin…

What could go right

  • AI/HBM-driven chip-test volume growth
  • Advanced-packaging socket demand

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor test capex cyclicality
  • New majority owner (SKC) integration/strategy risk

Moat: wide (IP/patents, process know-how, scale). World's first and largest maker of silicone-rubber test sockets, holding over half the global market and the most industry patents.

Headquarters: Icheon, South Korea · Founded: 2001 · Employees: 407

Named competitors

ISC at a glance

Size ISC (095340.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $1.82B, the 146th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩121,000 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 50.1%, against -22.1% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 60.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.1%); the operating margin is 30.3% (peer median 4.7%).

Valuation It trades at 29.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.1× (7th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 20.2 points above its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 75095340.KS 49
Six months, rebased to 100: ISC against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ISC financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩278B₩220B₩174B₩140B₩179B
Revenue growth—+26%+24%-22%—
Gross profit₩140B₩107B₩83.6B₩64.2B₩92.1B
EBITDA₩95.0B₩70.1B₩53.8B₩19.4B₩69.6B
Net income₩77.6B₩56.1B₩54.7B₩13.2B₩44.0B
Free cash flow₩49.8B₩36.0B₩39.3B₩7.85B₩45.9B
Capital expenditure₩12.4B₩6.33B₩11.6B₩14.6B₩20.1B
Total debt₩1.40B₩21.2B₩20.5B₩43.6B₩39.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ISC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%+20%COHU688372300323EMMVEE3006WAFAMS688593031980688709688503300118403870688484SHLS2441688107688209688552429A095340.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ISC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×500×COHU688372EMMVEE3006688593031980688709688484688552095340.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ISC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%COHU0319803001184038702441688552429A095340.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. ISC is the large dot.

ISC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (095340.KS vs 058470.KS vs 6961.T vs 6941.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
ISC 095340.KS$1.82B-50%+61%30%29.8×10.5%
Leeno Industrial 058470.KS$2.60B-61%+24%49%19.4×6.3%
Enplas 6961.T$397M-59%+25%16%9.5×5.5%
Yamaichi Electronics 6941.T$670M-45%+29%24%9.5×4.7%
Cohu COHU$1.82B-22%+34%-2%19.3×21.5%

How ISC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ISC against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure095340.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.2%-23.0%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-50.1%-22.1%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.6%-48.2%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+60.7%+16.1%4th highest of 21
Operating margin30.3%4.7%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E29.8×22.1×7th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)10.5%19.3%3rd least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.6%+2.7%3rd highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.0 pp-1.1 pp4th least demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+20.2 pp-7.2 pp2nd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA22.3×9.1×4th most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-3.8×-0.8×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
ISC 095340.KSSouth Korea$1.82B-50%+61%30%29.8×10.5%+12.6%
Cohu COHUUnited States$1.82B-22%+34%-2%19.3×21.5%-6.6%
Shanghai V-Test Semiconductor Tech 688372.SSChina$1.82B-53%+53%18%29.2×n/an/a
BOE HC SemiTek 300323.SZChina$1.81B-38%+23%-8%53.6×n/an/a
Emmvee Photovoltaic Power EMMVEE.NSIndia$1.84B-5%+116%29%11.4×n/an/a
Elite Semiconductor Microelectronics Technology 3006.TWTaiwan$1.79B+14%+273%49%1.6×n/an/a
Siltronic WAF.DEGermany$1.86B-46%+1%-16%n/an/an/a
ams-OSRAM AMS.SWSwitzerland$1.78B-16%-3%8%n/an/an/a
Shanghai New Vision Microelectronics 688593.SSChina$1.76B-22%+7%-4%643.2×n/an/a
Psk 031980.KSSouth Korea$1.89B-4%+7%36%19.2×19.3%+39.2%
Chengdu Sino-Microelectronics Tech 688709.SSChina$1.90B-47%-15%-19%29.9×n/an/a
Changzhou Fusion New Material 688503.SSChina$1.71B-53%+41%2%37.6×n/an/a
Risen Energy 300118.SZChina$1.71B-42%-52%-39%n/a38.4%-4.7%
HPSP 403870.KSSouth Korea$1.95B-37%-20%53%22.1×15.6%+23.1%
Southchip Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) 688484.SSChina$1.95B-21%+9%-2%882.8×n/an/a
Shoals Technologies SHLSUnited States$1.70B+14%+49%11%18.3×n/an/a
Greatek Electronics 2441.TWTaiwan$1.68B+4%+24%21%13.2×1.6%+2.7%
Shanghai Anlogic Infotech 688107.SSChina$1.67B-26%+70%-25%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Injoinic Technology 688209.SSChina$1.64B+5%+13%11%n/an/an/a
Aerospace Nanhu Electronic Information Technology 688552.SSChina$1.64B-19%+19%-6%231.3×35.8%+1.0%
Tekscend Photomask 429A.TJapan$1.64B-36%+10%22%9.9×6.4%+8.7%

Questions

Who are ISC's main competitors?
Named competitors: Leeno Industrial (058470.KS), JF Micro (private or unlisted), Johnstech International (private or unlisted), Enplas (6961.T), Yamaichi Electronics (6941.T), Cohu (COHU). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Cohu (COHU), Shanghai V-Test Semiconductor Tech (688372.SS), BOE HC SemiTek (300323.SZ), Emmvee Photovoltaic Power (EMMVEE.NS), Elite Semiconductor Microelectronics Technology (3006.TW), Siltronic (WAF.DE).
Is ISC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.8× against a peer median of 22.1×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has ISC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -50.1% against -22.1% for the median peer; over one year +52.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.