Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002765.SZ Landai Technology Group Corp. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Landai Technology Group Corp. Ltd. Class A002765.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$637M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
50.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.0 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
140 days
26 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.51
1D-3.0%
1W+0.6%
1M-2.0%
3M-7.1%
6M-30.9%
YTD-51.3%
1Y-50.1%
ATR %4.8%
52w lowhigh54.4% off high

What Landai Technology does

Employees: 4,706

Landai Technology at a glance

Size Landai Technology (002765.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $637M, the 3278th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.51 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.9%, against -18.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is -1.1% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 50.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.2× (3rd most expensive of 12).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.0 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82002765.SZ 69
Six months, rebased to 100: Landai Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Landai Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.65BCN¥3.85BCN¥3.53BCN¥2.80BCN¥2.87B
Revenue growth—+9%+26%-2%—
Gross profitCN¥665MCN¥595MCN¥450MCN¥292MCN¥465M
EBITDAn/aCN¥493MCN¥381MCN¥148MCN¥341M
Net income-CN¥10.8MCN¥185MCN¥124M-CN¥365MCN¥185M
Free cash flow-CN¥79.7M-CN¥135M-CN¥149M-CN¥400MCN¥17.4M
Capital expenditureCN¥311MCN¥415MCN¥409MCN¥558MCN¥460M
Total debtCN¥2.07BCN¥2.02BCN¥1.67BCN¥1.37BCN¥1.21B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Landai Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-10%0%BUR5195660530107262090026626463300547300237603348300507600178WHEELS0008166050882339002823JAMNAAUTO002406002765.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Landai Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%0×50×100×519566056463300547603348600178605088002823603701JAMNAAUTO002406002765.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Landai Technology is the large dot.

Landai Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Landai Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Landai Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002765.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.0%-5.6%7th highest of 21
6-month return-30.9%-18.6%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.4%-33.8%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.7%+3.5%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin-1.1%5.5%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E50.1×16.2×3rd most expensive of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.0 pp-2.9 pp9th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Landai Technology 002765.SZChina$637M-31%-2%-1%50.1×n/an/a
Burelle BUR.PAFrance$635M-23%-3%2%n/a-4.4%+7.6%
Bando Chemical Industries 5195.TJapan$632M+17%+6%9%11.4×-0.1%+7.9%
Depo Auto Parts Industrial 6605.TWTaiwan$642M-1%-6%15%7.5×-12.3%+6.4%
Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology 301072.SZChina$630M+63%+11%-6%n/an/an/a
Npr-riken 6209.TJapan$630M-5%-3%7%n/a2.1%-3.1%
Fengjing New Energy Technology 002662.SZChina$646M-27%-11%4%n/a2.6%-5.0%
TPR 6463.TJapan$620M+23%+1%6%9.6×-0.4%+4.6%
Sichuan Chuanhuan Technology 300547.SZChina$661M-48%-2%13%16.2×14.9%+17.3%
Shandong Meichen Technology 300237.SZChina$613M+23%-3%-7%n/a2.6%-10.1%
Wencan 603348.SSChina$670M-22%+3%-7%58.3×n/an/a
Jiangsu Olive Sensors High-Tech 300507.SZChina$671M-32%-17%5%n/a17.1%+23.1%
Harbin Dongan Auto Engine 600178.SSChina$603M-15%+4%-3%22.1×14.4%+1.3%
Wheels India WHEELS.NSIndia$597M+74%+17%5%n/a10.4%+17.8%
Jiangsu Nonghua Intelligent Agriculture Technology 000816.SZChina$597M-15%+14%6%n/an/an/a
GSP Automotive Group Wenzhou 605088.SSChina$590M-45%+15%8%13.6×n/an/a
BeijingWest Industries International 2339.HKHong Kong$589M-23%-3%1%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Kaizhong Precision Technology 002823.SZChina$585M-27%+10%8%13.8×-3.3%+8.8%
Zhejiang Dehong Automotive Electronic & Electrical 603701.SSChina$694M-29%+35%2%110.6×n/an/a
Jamna Auto Industries JAMNAAUTO.NSIndia$580M+4%+16%13%20.1×11.8%+19.3%
Xuchang Yuandong Drive Shaft 002406.SZChina$699M-24%+31%13%20.9×2.1%-6.3%

Questions

Which companies are Landai Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Burelle (BUR.PA), Bando Chemical Industries (5195.T), Depo Auto Parts Industrial (6605.TW), Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology (301072.SZ), Npr-riken (6209.T), Fengjing New Energy Technology (002662.SZ), TPR (6463.T), Sichuan Chuanhuan Technology (300547.SZ).
Is Landai Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 50.1× against a peer median of 16.2×, 3rd most expensive of 12 in its peer set.
How has Landai Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.9% against -18.6% for the median peer; over one year -50.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.