Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002608.SZ Jiangsu Guoxin Corp. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Jiangsu Guoxin Corp. Ltd. Class A002608.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Jiangsu state-owned investment holding company with interests in energy and port-related assets; specific businesses not fully confirmed.

Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$4.30B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
14%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥7.58
1D+1.5%
1W+3.8%
1M+0.5%
3M+0.7%
6M-0.5%
YTD+2.6%
1Y-11.4%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh31.9% off high

What Jiangsu Guoxin does

Jiangsu state-owned investment holding company with interests in energy and port-related assets; specific businesses not fully confirmed.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Investment holding

Moat: none

Headquarters: Nanjing, Jiangsu, China · Employees: 5,891

Named competitors

Jiangsu Guoxin at a glance

Size Jiangsu Guoxin (002608.SZ) is a China Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $4.30B, the 597th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥7.58 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.5%, against -8.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.3%); the operating margin is 5.3% (peer median 11.4%).

Valuation It trades at 12.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.1× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026002608.SZ 97Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Jiangsu Guoxin against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Jiangsu Guoxin financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥37.5BCN¥35.4BCN¥36.8BCN¥34.5BCN¥32.4B
Revenue growth—-4%+7%+6%—
Gross profitCN¥6.02BCN¥5.41BCN¥4.85BCN¥3.92BCN¥659M
EBITDAn/aCN¥7.03BCN¥6.25BCN¥5.28BCN¥1.83B
Net incomeCN¥2.34BCN¥3.47BCN¥3.24BCN¥1.87BCN¥60.1M
Free cash flowCN¥3.94BCN¥522M-CN¥486M-CN¥1.67BCN¥1.79B
Capital expenditureCN¥6.20BCN¥6.74BCN¥6.62BCN¥6.57BCN¥3.55B
Total debtCN¥40.8BCN¥40.8BCN¥43.1BCN¥43.2BCN¥38.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Jiangsu Guoxin competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%2380AQNNPIAGL95139501TA000027600157TPE0012869506DRXBEPCPAM600021600726600578NWE002608.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Jiangsu Guoxin is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0×100×200×2380AQNNPIAGL9513TA600157TPE9506BEPCPAMNWE002608.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Jiangsu Guoxin is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%NPI9513TA600157TPE001286DRX600578000539002608.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Jiangsu Guoxin is the large dot.

Jiangsu Guoxin competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002608.SZ vs 600023.SS vs 600027.SS vs 600011.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Jiangsu Guoxin 002608.SZ$4.30B-1%+7%5%12.6×-0.7%
Zhejiang Zheneng Electric Power 600023.SS$10.8B-5%-7%-1%17.4×7.0%
Huadian Power International 600027.SS$8.61B+3%-7%6%13.2×-0.4%
Huaneng Power International 600011.SS$16.4B+9%-5%9%13.5×-2.1%
Shenzhen Energy 000027.SZ$4.49B-8%+4%13%11.2×n/a

How Jiangsu Guoxin compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Jiangsu Guoxin against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002608.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.5%-1.0%8th highest of 21
6-month return-0.5%-8.5%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-31.9%-26.8%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%+2.3%6th highest of 21
Operating margin5.3%11.4%4th lowest of 20
Forward P/E12.6×11.1×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.7%0.8%4th least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.5%+5.4%3rd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.2 pp-0.9 pp3rd least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.4 pp-1.7 pp10th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Jiangsu Guoxin 002608.SZChina$4.30B-1%+7%5%12.6×-0.7%+10.5%
China Power International Development 2380.HKHong Kong$4.29B-20%-5%20%13.6×n/an/a
Algonquin Power & Utilities AQN.TOCanada$4.29B-9%+6%20%14.2×n/an/a
Northland Power NPI.TOCanada$4.22B-4%+15%34%14.3×-1.7%+3.4%
AGL Energy AGL.AXAustralia$4.21B-3%-6%11%10.5×n/an/a
Electric Power Development 9513.TJapan$4.39B+2%+4%10%8.2×4.5%+5.4%
Tokyo Elec Power Co Hldgs 9501.TJapan$4.17B-31%-2%1%3.7×n/an/a
TransAlta TA.TOCanada$4.15B+5%-12%8%49.9×21.9%+4.1%
Shenzhen Energy 000027.SZChina$4.49B-8%+4%13%11.2×n/an/a
Wintime Energy 600157.SSChina$4.55B-21%-9%7%104.2×0.8%+1.4%
TAURON Polska Energia TPE.WAPoland$4.02B-6%0%n/a6.1×17.0%+10.4%
Shaanxi Energy Investment 001286.SZChina$4.68B-16%+4%24%12.9×-9.2%+18.6%
Tohoku Electric Power 9506.TJapan$3.89B+13%+17%3%4.9×n/an/a
Drax DRX.LUnited Kingdom$3.88B0%-8%9%10.4×-0.2%+4.8%
Brookfield Renewable BEPCUnited States$4.79B-13%+6%19%249.6×n/an/a
Pampa Energia SA Sponsored ADR PAMUnited States$3.78B-19%+29%21%7.4×n/an/a
Shanghai Electric Power 600021.SSChina$4.98B-31%-6%13%8.9×n/an/a
Huadian Energy 600726.SSChina$5.01B-33%-7%10%n/an/an/a
Beijing Jingneng Power 600578.SSChina$5.06B+3%-6%11%11.0×-2.8%+12.2%
Guangdong Electric Power Development 000539.SZChina$3.64B-21%+8%-1%n/a9.8%+8.9%
NorthWestern Energy NWEUnited States$5.09B+14%+11%19%20.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Jiangsu Guoxin's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zhejiang Zheneng Electric Power (600023.SS), Huadian Power International (600027.SS), Huaneng Power International (600011.SS), Shenzhen Energy Group (000027.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Power International Development (2380.HK), Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN.TO), Northland Power (NPI.TO), AGL Energy (AGL.AX), Electric Power Development (9513.T), Tokyo Elec Power Co Hldgs (9501.T).
Is Jiangsu Guoxin expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.6× against a peer median of 11.1×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Jiangsu Guoxin stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.5% against -8.5% for the median peer; over one year -11.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.