Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002191.SZ Shenzhen Jinjia Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Jinjia Group Co., Ltd. Class A002191.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Commercial Printing/Forms
Momentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$674M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.84M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
33.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-15.1 pp
WACC 9.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
157 days
12 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥3.20
1D-0.6%
1W+3.2%
1M-7.5%
3M-15.1%
6M-15.6%
YTD-23.6%
1Y-28.4%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh32.8% off high

What Shenzhen Jinjia does

Employees: 3,900

Shenzhen Jinjia at a glance

Size Shenzhen Jinjia (002191.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Commercial Printing/Forms) with a market value of $674M, the 3156th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.6%, against -16.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 31.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.5%); the operating margin is -16.4% (peer median 6.2%).

Valuation It trades at 33.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.3× (2nd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.1 points below its cost of capital (9.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 83002191.SZ 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Jinjia against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Jinjia financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.38BCN¥2.98BCN¥2.86BCN¥3.93BCN¥5.16B
Revenue growth—+4%-27%-24%—
Gross profitCN¥635MCN¥460MCN¥708MCN¥932MCN¥1.34B
EBITDAn/aCN¥68.1MCN¥328MCN¥546MCN¥874M
Net income-CN¥416M-CN¥346MCN¥72.0MCN¥118MCN¥197M
Free cash flow-CN¥287MCN¥1.43MCN¥151MCN¥498MCN¥336M
Capital expenditureCN¥68.1MCN¥70.6MCN¥73.4MCN¥118MCN¥261M
Total debtCN¥295MCN¥611MCN¥814MCN¥1.18BCN¥585M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Jinjia competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%002229600681002599002117EBF6030587868TCPLPACK000812QUAD000695DLXWPL7860300556CMPR3012707915002191.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Jinjia is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×002599002117EBF7868TCPLPACKQUADDLXWPL7860CMPR002191.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Jinjia is the large dot.

Shenzhen Jinjia competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen Jinjia compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Jinjia against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002191.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.5%-7.9%10th highest of 21
6-month return-15.6%-16.6%10th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-32.8%-38.8%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+31.7%+0.5%4th highest of 20
Operating margin-16.4%6.2%2nd lowest of 20
Forward P/E33.1×13.3×2nd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-15.1 pp+2.8 pp2nd lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Jinjia 002191.SZChina$674M-16%+32%-16%33.1×n/an/a
Hongbo 002229.SZChina$677M-44%-59%-47%n/an/an/a
Bestsun Energy 600681.SSChina$696M-15%-7%10%n/a-8.3%+3.9%
Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions MPIMANIPAL.NSIndia$768Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Beijing Shengtong Printing 002599.SZChina$552M-17%-4%0%40.8×28.4%0.0%
Tungkong 002117.SZChina$543M-32%-12%12%22.3×5.7%+0.3%
Ennis EBFUnited States$528M+1%+2%14%13.3×-12.4%+1.9%
Yongji Printing 603058.SSChina$492M-28%-15%8%n/a25.0%+15.1%
KOSAIDO 7868.TJapan$434M-24%-5%18%15.2×-13.5%+2.8%
TCPL Packaging TCPLPACK.NSIndia$427M+58%+5%12%28.0×22.0%+15.0%
Shaanxi Jinye Science Technology and Education 000812.SZChina$406M-13%+1%-8%n/an/an/a
Quad/Graphics QUADUnited States$388M+2%-5%5%5.8×-7.0%-3.8%
Tianjin Binhai Energy & Development 000695.SZChina$386M-28%+57%-8%n/an/an/a
Deluxe DLXUnited States$1.22B0%0%13%6.6×2.1%+3.6%
Wirtualna Polska WPL.WAPoland$364M-6%+39%11%11.4×-5.0%+28.5%
Avex 7860.TJapan$353M+3%+7%3%13.2×-12.9%+12.4%
Guangdong New Grand Long Packing 002836.SZChina$348M-25%+6%8%n/a19.1%+15.4%
Silkroad Vision Technology 300556.SZChina$328M-9%+52%-2%n/an/an/a
Cimpress CMPRUnited States$1.39B-38%+10%6%12.4×5.4%+7.7%
Beijing Hanyi Innovation Technology 301270.SZChina$314M-19%-7%0%n/a46.1%-0.7%
Nissha 7915.TJapan$303M-19%0%2%n/a6.5%+1.6%

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen Jinjia's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hongbo (002229.SZ), Bestsun Energy (600681.SS), Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions (MPIMANIPAL.NS), Beijing Shengtong Printing (002599.SZ), Tungkong (002117.SZ), Ennis (EBF), Yongji Printing (603058.SS), KOSAIDO (7868.T).
Is Shenzhen Jinjia expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 33.1× against a peer median of 13.3×, 2nd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Jinjia stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.6% against -16.6% for the median peer; over one year -28.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.