Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002151.SZ Beijing BDStar Navigation Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing BDStar Navigation Co., Ltd. Class A002151.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Makes satellite-navigation (BeiDou/GNSS) chips, modules and terminals for mapping, timing and location applications.

≈ A Chinese GPS/GNSS module and solutions maker, similar niche to Trimble/u-bloxMomentum weak 25
Mkt cap
$2.10B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$53.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-12.4 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥26.05
1D-2.0%
1W+2.0%
1M-7.7%
3M-10.7%
6M-36.3%
YTD-42.7%
1Y-10.5%
ATR %4.3%
52w lowhigh61.1% off high

What Beijing BDStar Navigation does

Makes satellite-navigation (BeiDou/GNSS) chips, modules and terminals for mapping, timing and location applications.

In one line: A Chinese GPS/GNSS module and solutions maker, similar niche to Trimble/u-blox.

Products and services

  • GNSS chips/modules
  • Navigation terminals/receivers
  • Precision timing/mapping solutions

Customers

  • Government/surveying agencies
  • Transportation/logistics fleet operators
  • Consumer/industrial device makers needing position

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics / navigation
  • GNSS chips, modules and terminals
  • BeiDou-based positioning and timing…

What could go right

  • BeiDou ecosystem expansion
  • Autonomous vehicle/drone navigation demand

What could go wrong

  • Dependence on government BeiDou programs
  • Competition from global GNSS chip makers

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, IP / patents, installed base). Benefits from China's BeiDou satellite system rollout and government-linked positioning programs.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2000 · Employees: 2,656

Named competitors

Beijing BDStar Navigation at a glance

Size Beijing BDStar Navigation (002151.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $2.10B, the 1205th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥26.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.3%, against -32.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 34.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.1%); the operating margin is -14.2% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 5.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 7.5× (9th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.4 points below its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 67002151.SZ 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing BDStar Navigation against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing BDStar Navigation financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.61BCN¥2.20BCN¥1.49BCN¥4.07BCN¥3.81B
Revenue growth—+48%-63%+7%—
Gross profitCN¥1.01BCN¥628MCN¥354MCN¥666MCN¥965M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥62.1M-CN¥225M-CN¥191MCN¥262M
Net income-CN¥254M-CN¥257M-CN¥350MCN¥161MCN¥145M
Free cash flowCN¥7.41MCN¥190M-CN¥230M-CN¥525M-CN¥595M
Capital expenditureCN¥204MCN¥224MCN¥178MCN¥322MCN¥364M
Total debtCN¥196MCN¥256MCN¥277MCN¥180MCN¥1.03B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing BDStar Navigation competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%60300568716890ELG6001716884032658LASR6882056888073714POWI00250668848440387030010268812378566510688709002151.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing BDStar Navigation is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×60300568716890ELG6001716884032658LASR6882056888073714POWI00250640387030010268812378566510688709002151.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing BDStar Navigation is the large dot.

Beijing BDStar Navigation competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002151.SZ vs TRMB vs 688097.SS vs 300627.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Beijing BDStar Navigation 002151.SZ$2.10B-36%+35%-14%5.1×n/a
Trimble TRMB$12.6B-11%+7%18%3.6×15.3%
Bozhon Precision Industry Technology 688097.SS$3.00B-23%+74%7%2.5×n/a
Shanghai HuaCe Navigation Technology 300627.SZ$2.44B-35%0%13%4.2×18.6%
Beijing UniStrong Science & Technology 002383.SZ$712M-30%-1%-15%3.9×n/a
Hexagon HEXA-B.ST$29.4B+14%-20%-14%6.0×9.1%

How Beijing BDStar Navigation compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing BDStar Navigation against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002151.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.7%-20.9%6th highest of 21
6-month return-36.3%-32.6%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-61.1%-56.9%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+34.9%+12.1%6th highest of 21
Operating margin-14.2%6.1%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales5.1×7.5×9th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.4 pp-6.1 pp6th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing BDStar Navigation 002151.SZChina$2.10B-36%+35%-14%5.1×n/an/a
China Wafer Level CSP 603005.SSChina$2.10B-31%+7%23%8.0×28.3%+6.2%
Micronics Japan 6871.TJapan$2.11B-33%+38%28%3.7×n/an/a
Ferrotec 6890.TJapan$2.08B-19%+43%12%1.2×n/an/a
Elmos Semiconductor ELG.DEGermany$2.13B-36%+9%20%3.0×12.9%+20.2%
Shanghai Belling Corp.,Ltd 600171.SSChina$2.14B-30%+11%4%3.8×39.4%+19.1%
Union Semiconductor (Hefei) 688403.SSChina$2.15B-14%+13%3%7.5×n/an/a
Guangdong Tianyu Semiconductor 2658.HKHong Kong$2.17B-3%+52%-30%23.1×n/an/a
nLIGHT LASRUnited States$2.19B+72%+43%-5%6.0×39.2%+3.2%
Wuxi Taclink Optoelectronics Technology 688205.SSChina$2.20B-62%+20%3%13.5×n/an/a
Xiamen UX IC 688807.SSChina$2.22B-48%+26%13%23.7×n/an/a
Ennostar 3714.TWTaiwan$2.23B-23%-5%-13%2.7×n/an/a
POWI POWIUnited States$2.25B-45%+2%8%4.4×35.9%-1.9%
GCL System Integration Technology 002506.SZChina$2.26B-39%-32%-10%1.8×31.8%+20.8%
Southchip Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) 688484.SSChina$1.95B-21%+9%-2%3.7×n/an/a
HPSP 403870.KSSouth Korea$1.95B-37%-20%53%15.0×15.6%+23.1%
Xiamen Changelight 300102.SZChina$2.26B-50%-38%-2%7.5×34.6%+21.1%
Giantec Semiconductor 688123.SSChina$2.27B-23%+13%22%9.8×39.2%+19.8%
Hermes Testing Solutions 7856.TWOTaiwan$2.29B-32%+52%12%30.8×52.1%+51.8%
Chunghwa Precision Test Tech 6510.TWOTaiwan$2.30B-37%+24%32%12.4×24.4%+2.7%
Chengdu Sino-Microelectronics Tech 688709.SSChina$1.90B-47%-15%-19%21.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Beijing BDStar Navigation's main competitors?
Named competitors: u-blox (private or unlisted), Trimble (TRMB), Unicore Communications (688097.SS), Hi-Target Surveying Instrument (private or unlisted), Shanghai Huace Navigation (300627.SZ), Beijing UniStrong (002383.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Wafer Level CSP (603005.SS), Micronics Japan (6871.T), Ferrotec (6890.T), Elmos Semiconductor (ELG.DE), Shanghai Belling Corp.,Ltd (600171.SS), Union Semiconductor (Hefei) (688403.SS).
Is Beijing BDStar Navigation expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.1× against a peer median of 7.5×, 9th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Beijing BDStar Navigation stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.3% against -32.6% for the median peer; over one year -10.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.