Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002039.SZ Guizhou Qianyuan Power Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guizhou Qianyuan Power Co., Ltd. Class A002039.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Hydropower generator operating dams across Guizhou province, selling electricity to the provincial grid.

Momentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$1.19B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
49%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.5 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
140 days
26 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥18.56
1D+0.4%
1W+0.2%
1M-7.2%
3M-8.8%
6M-8.5%
YTD+2.1%
1Y+3.6%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh20.3% off high

What Guizhou Qianyuan Power does

Hydropower generator operating dams across Guizhou province, selling electricity to the provincial grid.

Sells the power from its dams to the provincial grid at tariffs set or guided by the government, so revenue is the water passing through its turbines times that price. Output swings from year to year with rainfall, while costs are mostly fixed, being the dams themselves.

Products and services

  • Hydropower generation

Customers

  • State Grid Guizhou

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Power generation
  • Hydropower
  • Provincial grid offtake

What could go right

  • Wet-year hydrology upside

What could go wrong

  • Drought / low rainfall years
  • Regulated tariff caps

Moat: narrow (installed base). Owns established hydro dam sites, but tariffs are regulated and output depends on rainfall.

Headquarters: Guiyang, Guizhou, China · Employees: 828

Guizhou Qianyuan Power at a glance

Size Guizhou Qianyuan Power (002039.SZ) is a China Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $1.19B, the 1977th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥18.56 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.5%, against -13.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is 45.4% (peer median 9.5%).

Valuation It trades at 19.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 10.9× (4th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.5 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026002039.SZ 90Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Guizhou Qianyuan Power against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guizhou Qianyuan Power financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.98BCN¥3.25BCN¥1.91BCN¥1.97BCN¥2.59B
Revenue growth—+70%-3%-24%—
Gross profitCN¥2.19BCN¥1.80BCN¥933MCN¥1.00BCN¥1.43B
EBITDAn/aCN¥2.43BCN¥1.36BCN¥1.43BCN¥2.03B
Net incomeCN¥515MCN¥600MCN¥218MCN¥265MCN¥414M
Free cash flowCN¥1.88BCN¥2.06BCN¥1.09BCN¥1.58BCN¥1.27B
Capital expenditureCN¥391MCN¥370MCN¥168MCN¥222MCN¥673M
Total debtCN¥5.74BCN¥6.37BCN¥7.91BCN¥8.58BCN¥9.54B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guizhou Qianyuan Power competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-10%0%+10%000722NEAG18113498SGMART000899AFKELEC9505UTL9509PEP600780600509000767JPPOWERHE600310TEP002039.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guizhou Qianyuan Power is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×NEAG18113498SGMART0008999505UTL9509PEP600509HE600310TEP002039.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guizhou Qianyuan Power is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%+300%0%100%200%300%000722NEAGSGMART000899AFK002039.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Guizhou Qianyuan Power is the large dot.

Guizhou Qianyuan Power competitors and peer comparison

How Guizhou Qianyuan Power compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guizhou Qianyuan Power against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002039.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.2%-3.7%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-8.5%-13.3%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-20.3%-29.7%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.8%+3.2%5th highest of 21
Operating margin45.4%9.5%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E19.5×10.9×4th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.1%2.5%4th least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.4%+10.2%5th lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-14.5 pp-4.0 pp8th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.5 pp+0.2 pp5th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Guizhou Qianyuan Power 002039.SZChina$1.19B-8%+14%45%19.5×-10.1%+4.4%
Hunan Energy Group Development 000722.SZChina$1.19B-13%+126%48%n/a0.8%+2.4%
naturenergie NEAG.SWSwitzerland$1.17B-12%-16%13%12.1×-15.5%+5.6%
CGN New Energy 1811.HKHong Kong$1.16B-23%-12%26%6.2×4.2%+8.2%
Kasumigaseki Capital 3498.TJapan$1.16B+15%+70%17%7.6×n/an/a
SG Mart SGMART.NSIndia$1.15B+55%+9%3%50.0×30.1%+298.2%
Jiangxi Ganneng 000899.SZChina$1.26B-31%+24%13%7.4×-4.4%+22.6%
Arendals Fossekompani AFK.OLNorway$1.11B-2%-7%11%n/a14.4%+3.6%
Electricite de Strasbourg ELEC.PAFrance$1.29B-34%-10%8%n/a-10.7%+11.1%
Hokuriku Electric Power 9505.TJapan$1.34B+16%-5%7%7.6×8.4%+3.7%
Unitil UTLUnited States$1.05B+11%+21%19%16.2×n/an/a
Hokkaido Electric Power Company,Incorporated 9509.TJapan$1.38B+5%-1%4%7.3×n/an/a
Polenergia PEP.WAPoland$1.02B+3%-19%6%30.6×15.8%+18.5%
Top Energy Co. Ltd. Shanxi 600780.SSChina$1.02B-13%0%5%n/a-15.1%+10.2%
Xinjiang Tianfu Energy 600509.SSChina$1.40B-16%+9%7%14.7×-4.3%+11.5%
Jinneng Holding Shanxi Electric Power 000767.SZChina$1.40B-20%-6%6%n/a2.5%+5.6%
Jaiprakash Power Ventures JPPOWER.NSIndia$1.01B-29%+6%21%n/a9.9%+11.0%
Hawaiian Electric Industries HEUnited States$1.45B-43%+2%11%5.2×n/an/a
Vedanta Power VEDPOWER.NSIndia$1.46Bn/a+5%-13%n/an/an/a
Guangxi Energy 600310.SSChina$939M-14%+11%16%20.3×4.8%-27.7%
Telecom Plus TEP.LUnited Kingdom$922M-15%+6%6%10.9×-8.6%+17.6%

Questions

Which companies are Guizhou Qianyuan Power's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hunan Energy Group Development (000722.SZ), naturenergie (NEAG.SW), CGN New Energy (1811.HK), Kasumigaseki Capital (3498.T), SG Mart (SGMART.NS), Jiangxi Ganneng (000899.SZ), Arendals Fossekompani (AFK.OL), Electricite de Strasbourg (ELEC.PA).
Is Guizhou Qianyuan Power expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.5× against a peer median of 10.9×, 4th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Guizhou Qianyuan Power stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.5% against -13.3% for the median peer; over one year +3.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.