Loading…

CJ001040.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Food: Specialty/Candy

Holding company of CJ Group, controlling food (CJ CheilJedang), entertainment (CJ ENM), logistics (CJ Logistics) and retail (Olive Young).

Momentum neutral 42
Mkt cap
$2.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
55%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.87M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.3 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩113,800
1D-3.0%
1W+2.5%
1M-13.7%
3M-13.8%
6M-49.3%
YTD-32.7%
1Y-33.1%
ATR %5.3%
52w lowhigh51.5% off high

What CJ does

Holding company of CJ Group, controlling food (CJ CheilJedang), entertainment (CJ ENM), logistics (CJ Logistics) and retail (Olive Young).

Earns mainly dividends from its subsidiaries and brand-licence fees that group companies pay for using the CJ name, so results follow the food, entertainment, logistics and retail businesses rather than any operation of its own. The Lee family, descended from Samsung's founder, holds control.

Products and services

  • CJ CheilJedang stake
  • CJ ENM stake
  • CJ Logistics stake
  • CJ Olive Young stake

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Diversified conglomerate holding…
  • Food, entertainment, logistics and…
  • Group holding structure

What could go right

  • Growth across food, content and logistics subsidiaries
  • Olive Young value unlock ahead of a potential IPO

What could go wrong

  • Holding-company discount
  • Subsidiary-level cyclicality

Moat: none. Pure holding company; value depends on the performance of listed and unlisted subsidiaries.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1953 · Employees: 64

Named competitors

CJ at a glance

Size CJ (001040.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $2.71B, the 107th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩113,800 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 49.3%, against -45.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +26.5%); the operating margin is 5.1% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 7.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.9× (4th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.3 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 55001040.KS 51
Six months, rebased to 100: CJ against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CJ financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩46.3T₩45.0T₩43.6T₩41.4T₩40.9T
Revenue growth—+3%+6%+1%—
Gross profit₩12.4T₩12.1T₩11.8T₩10.6T₩10.5T
EBITDA₩5.86T₩6.04T₩6.27T₩5.10T₩5.30T
Net income₩47.0B₩143B₩94.3B₩195B₩202B
Free cash flow₩2.07T₩1.85T₩2.71T₩2.93T₩1.64T
Capital expenditure₩3.00T₩3.37T₩2.65T₩3.10T₩3.69T
Total debt₩19.6T₩18.5T₩19.0T₩18.1T₩19.9T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CJ competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%267270062040000880012750454910240810108490047040001440066970052690241560028670000500017800036930319660277810001040.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CJ is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×600×267270062040000880012750240810047040001440052690017800036930277810001040.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CJ is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%267270062040012750240810047040241560017800319660375500001040.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. CJ is the large dot.

CJ competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (001040.KS vs 028260.KS vs 034730.KS vs 004990.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
CJ 001040.KS$2.71B-49%+5%5%7.3×-1.8%
Samsung C&t 028260.KS$31.3B-8%+14%8%15.0×5.9%
SK 034730.KS$17.9B+5%+15%7%2.2×n/a
Lotte 004990.KS$1.18B-27%+1%2%69.5×n/a

How CJ compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CJ against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure001040.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.7%-33.7%4th highest of 21
6-month return-49.3%-45.5%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-51.5%-63.0%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.6%+26.5%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin5.1%6.6%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E7.3×11.9×4th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.8%-4.9%5th most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.1%+6.3%5th highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.9 pp-6.6 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.3 pp-0.9 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.6×13.2×2nd cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×1.1×4th most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CJ 001040.KSSouth Korea$2.71B-49%+5%5%7.3×-1.8%+7.1%
Hd Ce 267270.KSSouth Korea$2.80B-56%+115%8%8.6×-9.6%+9.6%
Sanil Electric 062040.KSSouth Korea$2.62B-56%+29%36%17.1×15.1%+50.8%
Hanwha 000880.KSSouth Korea$2.86B-30%+35%6%4.5×n/an/a
S-1 012750.KSSouth Korea$2.45B+14%+1%7%21.8×-1.2%+5.4%
Doosan Robotics 454910.KSSouth Korea$2.41B-54%+97%-91%n/an/an/a
Wonik IPS 240810.KSSouth Korea$2.39B-43%+9%8%14.7×29.4%-3.6%
ROBOTIS 108490.KSSouth Korea$2.37B-30%+52%-16%n/an/an/a
DWEC 047040.KSSouth Korea$3.11B-70%-16%-7%7.7×-4.9%-0.2%
Taihan Cable & Solution 001440.KSSouth Korea$2.31B-70%+22%5%99.2×n/an/a
L&F 066970.KSSouth Korea$2.15B-62%+81%8%n/an/an/a
LS 006260.KSSouth Korea$3.51B-62%+30%4%8.0×n/an/a
Kepco E&c 052690.KSSouth Korea$2.07B-61%+8%10%45.6×n/an/a
Doosan Bobcat 241560.KSSouth Korea$3.64B-28%+11%9%9.0×-13.3%+15.5%
PanOcean 028670.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-12%+24%9%5.0×n/an/a
Gaon Cable 000500.KSSouth Korea$3.97B+50%+32%3%n/an/an/a
Hyundai Elevator 017800.KSSouth Korea$1.79B-31%-9%9%9.4×-5.5%+6.3%
Jusung Engineering 036930.KSSouth Korea$4.39B+5%-33%0%145.3×n/an/a
Psk 319660.KSSouth Korea$1.66B-12%+32%25%14.4×6.1%+11.5%
Rainbow Robotics 277810.KSSouth Korea$4.59B-52%+92%-16%653.8×n/an/a
Dl E&c 375500.KSSouth Korea$1.53B-48%-17%4%5.2×-8.3%-5.3%

Questions

Who are CJ's main competitors?
Named competitors: Samsung C&T (028260.KS), SK Inc (034730.KS), LOTTE (004990.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Hd Ce (267270.KS), Sanil Electric (062040.KS), Hanwha (000880.KS), S-1 (012750.KS), Doosan Robotics (454910.KS), Wonik IPS (240810.KS).
Is CJ expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.3× against a peer median of 11.9×, 4th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has CJ stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -49.3% against -45.5% for the median peer; over one year -33.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.