Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000792.SZ Qinghai Salt Lake Industry Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry Co., Ltd. Class A000792.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Chemicals: Agricultural

Chinese producer of potash fertilizer and lithium carbonate extracted from Qinghai's salt-lake brine.

≈ China's Albemarle/Intrepid Potash hybridMomentum laggard 19
Mkt cap
$17.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$160M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+26.6 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
143 days
29 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥23.15
1D-1.4%
1W+6.4%
1M-3.4%
3M-15.5%
6M-41.1%
YTD-17.8%
1Y+1.2%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh44.4% off high

What Qinghai Salt Lake Industry does

Chinese producer of potash fertilizer and lithium carbonate extracted from Qinghai's salt-lake brine.

Pumps brine from Qinghai's salt lake into evaporation ponds, where potash crystallises first, and lithium is extracted from the same brine afterwards. It is China's largest potash producer, and lithium carbonate has swung with battery demand. Chinese state-owned groups control it.

In one line: China's Albemarle/Intrepid Potash hybrid.

Products and services

  • Potassium chloride (potash) fertilizer
  • Lithium carbonate
  • Other salt-lake chemicals

Customers

  • Fertilizer distributors/farmers
  • Battery material producers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Chemicals: Agricultural
  • Salt-lake brine potash and lithium…

What could go right

  • EV battery lithium demand
  • Potash price cycles

What could go wrong

  • Lithium price volatility
  • Salt-lake resource depletion/environmental limits

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Controls one of China's largest salt-lake brine resources, a low-cost lithium/potash source.

Headquarters: Golmud, China · Founded: 1958 · Employees: 5,864

Named competitors

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry at a glance

Size Qinghai Salt Lake Industry (000792.SZ) is a China Materials company (Chemicals: Agricultural) with a market value of $17.8B, the 129th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥23.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 41.1%, against -8.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 48.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is 56.9% (peer median 13.2%).

Valuation It trades at 9.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.2× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 26.6 points above its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 90000792.SZ 57
Six months, rebased to 100: Qinghai Salt Lake Industry against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥23.4BCN¥15.4BCN¥15.0BCN¥21.4BCN¥30.4B
Revenue growth—+3%-30%-30%—
Gross profitCN¥16.9BCN¥8.58BCN¥7.57BCN¥11.8BCN¥23.8B
EBITDAn/aCN¥7.79BCN¥6.16BCN¥10.7BCN¥22.2B
Net incomeCN¥12.9BCN¥8.48BCN¥4.66BCN¥7.91BCN¥15.6B
Free cash flowCN¥10.1BCN¥8.60BCN¥6.57BCN¥11.1BCN¥16.8B
Capital expenditureCN¥1.40BCN¥1.64BCN¥1.22BCN¥943MCN¥702M
Total debtCN¥1.60BCN¥1.12BCN¥371MCN¥6.62BCN¥7.50B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%0%+10%CFYARNTRMOSICLFACTUPLDNL000792.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Qinghai Salt Lake Industry is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×CFYARNTRMOSICLUPLDNL000792.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Qinghai Salt Lake Industry is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%-10%0%10%CFYARNTRICLUPL000792.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Qinghai Salt Lake Industry is the large dot.

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (000792.SZ vs 002466.SZ vs 002460.SZ vs NTR.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Qinghai Salt Lake Industry 000792.SZ$17.8B-41%+48%57%9.9×-2.7%
Tianqi Lithium 002466.SZ$8.97B-54%+104%57%9.0×-1.2%
Ganfeng Lithium 002460.SZ$9.71B-57%+128%18%11.5×4.4%
Nutrien NTR.TO$34.3B+8%+8%14%13.2×4.1%
Mosaic Company (The) MOS$7.11B+2%0%3%26.2×n/a
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. Sponsored ADR Pfd Series B SQM$16.0B-37%+59%39%7.3×-4.8%
Albemarle ALB$11.7B-51%+18%14%11.3×10.9%
Asia-Potash International Investment (Guangzhou) 000893.SZ$5.08B-32%+40%36%11.6×-3.3%

How Qinghai Salt Lake Industry compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Qinghai Salt Lake Industry against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000792.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.4%+0.7%4th lowest of 9
6-month return-41.1%-8.0%lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-44.4%-29.5%lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+48.0%+9.1%highest of 9
Operating margin56.9%13.2%highest of 9
Forward P/E9.9×13.2×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.7%3.5%3rd least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.0%+7.2%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.7 pp-3.8 pp3rd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+26.6 pp-1.4 pphighest of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Qinghai Salt Lake Industry 000792.SZChina$17.8B-41%+48%57%9.9×-2.7%+2.0%
CF Industries CFUnited States$18.1B+4%+20%41%9.8×-11.8%+11.4%
Yara International YAR.OLNorway$11.0B-26%+2%13%8.2×-6.9%+8.3%
Nutrien NTR.TOCanada$34.3B+8%+8%14%13.2×4.1%+6.0%
Mosaic Company (The) MOSUnited States$7.11B+2%0%3%26.2×n/an/a
ICL ICLUnited States$6.04B-27%+11%11%11.5×3.5%+7.2%
Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore FACT.NSIndia$5.14B-18%+32%0%n/an/an/a
UPL UPL.NSIndia$4.78B-18%+10%14%14.8×10.9%+6.0%
Dyno Nobel DNL.AXAustralia$4.64B+6%-17%15%21.1×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Qinghai Salt Lake Industry's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tianqi Lithium (002466.SZ), Ganfeng Lithium (002460.SZ), Sinochem (private or unlisted), Nutrien (NTR.TO), Mosaic (MOS), K+S (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CF Industries (CF), Yara International (YAR.OL), Nutrien (NTR.TO), Mosaic Company (The) (MOS), ICL (ICL), Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore (FACT.NS).
Is Qinghai Salt Lake Industry expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.9× against a peer median of 13.2×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Qinghai Salt Lake Industry stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -41.1% against -8.0% for the median peer; over one year +1.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.