Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000665.SZ Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network Co., Ltd. Class A000665.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Communication Services›Cable/Satellite TV
Momentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$698M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
94%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-8.1 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥4.09
1D0.0%
1W+12.1%
1M+1.0%
3M+2.5%
6M-14.6%
YTD-29.7%
1Y-35.8%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh43.3% off high

What Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network does

Employees: 5,757

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network at a glance

Size Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network (000665.SZ) is a China Communication Services company (Cable/Satellite TV) with a market value of $698M, the 3069th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.09 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.6%, against -7.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.0%); the operating margin is -48.1% (peer median 2.6%).

Valuation It trades at 5.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.4× (2nd most expensive of 12).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.1 points below its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93000665.SZ 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.43BCN¥1.52BCN¥1.59BCN¥1.97BCN¥2.18B
Revenue growth—-5%-19%-10%—
Gross profitCN¥290M-CN¥183M-CN¥155MCN¥15.4MCN¥89.7M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥28.0M-CN¥36.0MCN¥65.2MCN¥254M
Net income-CN¥1.09B-CN¥1.09B-CN¥795M-CN¥652M-CN¥595M
Free cash flowCN¥15.8M-CN¥87.7M-CN¥90.9M-CN¥673M-CN¥482M
Capital expenditureCN¥56.8MCN¥147MCN¥113MCN¥418MCN¥593M
Total debtCN¥3.66BCN¥4.02BCN¥3.82BCN¥3.66BCN¥3.34B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%RAYVPLAY-A002238600936600996AMCX6464CCACPS000156600959000665.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%0×5×10×RAYVPLAY-A002238600936600996AMCX6464CCACPS000156000665.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network is the large dot.

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network competitors and peer comparison

How Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000665.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.0%-2.4%5th highest of 12
6-month return-14.6%-7.9%4th lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-43.3%-31.2%3rd lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.8%-4.0%4th highest of 12
Operating margin-48.1%2.6%2nd lowest of 12
EV / Sales5.4×2.4×2nd most expensive of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-8.1 pp-0.0 pp3rd lowest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network 000665.SZChina$698M-15%+1%-48%5.4×n/an/a
Stingray RAY.TOCanada$786M+11%+32%20%3.2×5.5%+13.1%
Viaplay VPLAY-A.STSweden$615M+32%+20%3%0.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen Topway Video Communication 002238.SZChina$810M-8%-16%-22%4.7×16.0%-5.8%
Guangxi Beitou Technology 600936.SSChina$925M-11%+13%2%2.4×15.7%+10.6%
Guizhou Broadcasting & TV Information Network 600996.SSChina$1.22B-23%-7%-89%13.0×30.2%-18.3%
AMC Global Media AMCXUnited States$346M-5%-5%8%0.7×-4.9%-3.9%
Taiwan Optical Platform 6464.TWTaiwan$311M+5%0%26%3.8×-2.3%+0.6%
Cogeco Communications CCA.TOCanada$1.67B-13%-4%26%2.4×-8.9%+2.2%
Cyfrowy Polsat CPS.WAPoland$2.08B-24%0%10%1.5×6.6%+3.7%
Wasu Media 000156.SZChina$2.17B+5%-4%2%1.0×-6.9%+3.9%
Jiangsu Broadcasting Cable Information Network 600959.SSChina$2.42B-17%-8%-8%2.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Stingray (RAY.TO), Viaplay (VPLAY-A.ST), Shenzhen Topway Video Communication (002238.SZ), Guangxi Beitou Technology (600936.SS), Guizhou Broadcasting & TV Information Network (600996.SS), AMC Global Media (AMCX), Taiwan Optical Platform (6464.TW), Cogeco Communications (CCA.TO).
Is Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.4× against a peer median of 2.4×, 2nd most expensive of 12 in its peer set.
How has Hubei Broadcasting & Television Information Network stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.6% against -7.9% for the median peer; over one year -35.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.