Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TMTS Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II Class ATMTSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Financials›Financial Conglomerates
Mkt cap
$307M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.39M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · USD$10.03
1Dn/a
1W+0.3%
1M-0.3%
3M+0.2%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %0.1%
52w lowhigh4.0% off high

What Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II does

Employees: 2

Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II at a glance

Size Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II (TMTS) is a United States Financials company (Financial Conglomerates) with a market value of $307M, the 3097th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $10.03 on 6 Nov 2026.

Short interest Short interest is 0.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025
Revenuen/a$0
Revenue growth——
Gross profitn/a$0
EBITDAn/a-$1.04M
Net incomen/a-$1.04M
Free cash flown/a-$41,500
Capital expendituren/a$0
Total debt$0$154,359

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II competitors and peer comparison

How Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTMTSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.3%+0.2%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-4.0%-0.5%5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II TMTSUnited States$307Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. IV SVIVUnited States$308Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Columbus Circle Capital Corp. III CCCTUnited States$308Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Viking Acquisition Corp. II VIIUnited States$307M-6%n/an/an/an/an/a
Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. II VHCPUnited States$309Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
ITHAX Acquisition Corp. III ITHAUnited States$309Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Launch Two Acquisition LPBBUnited States$311M+2%n/an/an/an/an/a
Bitcoin Infrastructure Acquisition BIXIUnited States$304M+2%n/an/an/an/an/a
Metals Acquisition Corp. II MTALUnited States$311M-17%n/an/an/an/an/a
Cambridge Acquisition CAQUnited States$311Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Legato Merger Corp. IV LEGOUnited States$311Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
LightWave Acquisition LWACUnited States$312M+3%n/an/an/an/an/a
Jena Acquisition Corporation II JENAUnited States$303M+2%n/an/an/an/an/a
OTG Acquisition Corp. I OTGAUnited States$303M+2%n/an/an/an/an/a
Highview Merger HVMCUnited States$303M+3%n/an/an/an/an/a
GSR IV Acquisition GSRFUnited States$303M+3%n/an/an/an/an/a
Illumination Acquisition Corp. I ILLUUnited States$312Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Quantum Leap Acquisition QLEPUnited States$302Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
GSR V Acquisition GSRVUnited States$302Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Abony Acquisition Corp. I AACOUnited States$314Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Activate Energy Acquisition AEAQUnited States$317Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Spartacus Acquisition Corp. II's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. IV (SVIV), Columbus Circle Capital Corp. III (CCCT), Viking Acquisition Corp. II (VII), Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. II (VHCP), ITHAX Acquisition Corp. III (ITHA), Launch Two Acquisition (LPBB), Bitcoin Infrastructure Acquisition (BIXI), Metals Acquisition Corp. II (MTAL).

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.