Loading…

Seagate TechnologySTXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Computer Peripherals

Maker of hard-disk drives for data centers, mainly high-capacity nearline HDDs used for cloud and enterprise storage.

Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$106B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.85B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+77.3 pp
WACC 15.5%
Hurdle
+19 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
82 days
27 Jan 2027
Close · USD$460.99
1D-1.2%
1W-28.5%
1M-40.5%
3M-42.5%
6M-41.1%
YTD+67.8%
1Y+68.0%
ATR %11.8%
Beta2.46
52w lowhigh59.7% off high

What Seagate Technology does

Maker of hard-disk drives for data centers, mainly high-capacity nearline HDDs used for cloud and enterprise storage.

Is one of three hard-disk makers worldwide, with Western Digital and Toshiba. Sells large-capacity drives chiefly to cloud providers and enterprises in volume under supply plans, so shipments follow data-centre storage spending. HAMR, laser-assisted recording, is its route to higher capacity per drive.

Products and services

  • Nearline/enterprise HDDs
  • Mozaic HAMR drives
  • Legacy consumer HDDs
  • Storage systems (Lyve)

Customers

  • Hyperscale cloud providers
  • Enterprise data centers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Hardware
  • Data storage
  • Hard-disk drives

What could go right

  • AI-driven exabyte storage demand
  • Cloud data-center capex growth

What could go wrong

  • SSD displacing HDD in some tiers
  • Hyperscaler customer concentration

Moat: narrow (scale, IP / patents, switching costs). One of only two scaled HDD makers, with deep areal-density recording IP.

Headquarters: Fremont, California, US · Founded: 1978 · Employees: 30,000

Named competitors

Seagate Technology at a glance

Size Seagate Technology (STX) is a United States Information Technology company (Computer Peripherals) with a market value of $106B, the 119th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $460.99 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 41.1%, against +18.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 44.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +25.4%); the operating margin is 40.5% (peer median 26.0%).

Valuation It trades at 9.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.2× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 77.3 points above its cost of capital (15.5% WACC).

Credit Seagate Technology has 5 bonds outstanding ($1.37B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BB+ at a weighted spread of 154 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 111STX 55
Six months, rebased to 100: Seagate Technology against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Seagate Technology financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$13.8B$12.2B$9.10B$6.55B$7.38B
Revenue growth—+34%+39%-11%—
Gross profit$6.95B$5.56B$3.20B$1.55B$1.42B
EBITDA$5.87B$4.50B$2.17B$702M$642M
Net income$4.40B$3.18B$1.47B$335M-$529M
Free cash flow$4.16B$3.10B$818M$664M$626M
Capital expenditure$675M$569M$265M$254M$316M
Total debt$2.67B$3.90B$5.37B$6.07B$5.83B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Seagate Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%WDC2317SNDKANETNTAPP7751STX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Seagate Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%10×20×30×WDC2317SNDKANETNTAPP7751STXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Seagate Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%WDCSNDKANETNTAPP7751STXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Seagate Technology is the large dot.

Seagate Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (STX vs WDC vs SNDK vs 285A.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Seagate Technology STX$106B-41%+44%40%9.8×22.1%
Western Digital WDC$98.7B-45%+21%41%9.2×20.7%
Sandisk SNDK$119B-47%+272%73%3.4×3.5%
Kioxia 285A.T$88.9B+139%+265%70%2.5×-3.0%

How Seagate Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Seagate Technology against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSTXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.5%-26.8%2nd lowest of 8
6-month return-41.1%+18.1%3rd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-59.7%-29.8%3rd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+44.4%+25.4%2nd highest of 8
Operating margin40.5%26.0%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E9.8×12.2×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.1%18.0%3rd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.7%+12.4%2nd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+19.4 pp+5.0 pp3rd most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+77.3 pp+23.7 pp3rd highest of 7
EV / EBITDA18.3×15.5×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×-0.4×2nd most indebted of 8
Bond spread154 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Seagate Technology STXUnited States$106B-41%+44%40%9.8×22.1%+2.7%
Western Digital WDCUnited States$98.7B-45%+21%41%9.2×20.7%-5.3%
Hon Hai Precision Industry 2317.TWTaiwan$95.6B-3%+25%4%10.5×n/an/a
Sandisk SNDKUnited States$119B-47%+272%73%3.4×3.5%+49.3%
Arista Networks ANETUnited States$215B+20%+41%44%30.4×29.8%+31.2%
NetApp NTAPUnited States$33.2B+43%+12%26%17.0×15.2%+3.8%
Everpure PUnited States$32.2B+24%+27%5%29.6×58.7%+16.8%
Canon 7751.TJapan$28.4B+18%+4%10%12.2×-0.6%+7.9%

Seagate Technology bonds and credit

Seagate Technology has 5 bonds outstanding with $1.37B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BB+. Weighted yield 6.20%, a spread of 154 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Seagate Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Western Digital (WDC), Toshiba (private or unlisted), Sandisk (SNDK), Kioxia Holdings (285A.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Western Digital (WDC), Hon Hai Precision Industry (2317.TW), Sandisk (SNDK), Arista Networks (ANET), NetApp (NTAP), Everpure (P).
Is Seagate Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.8× against a peer median of 12.2×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Seagate Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -41.1% against +18.1% for the median peer; over one year +68.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.