Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SMC Summit Midstream CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Summit Midstream CorporationSMCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oil & Gas Pipelines
Momentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$551M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
70%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.05M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
147.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.2 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · USD$27.13
1D+1.3%
1W-12.5%
1M-17.0%
3M-14.8%
6M-8.9%
YTD+1.7%
1Y+22.1%
ATR %4.6%
Beta0.30
52w lowhigh25.6% off high

What Summit Midstream does

Employees: 296

Summit Midstream at a glance

Size Summit Midstream (SMC) is a United States Energy company (Oil & Gas Pipelines) with a market value of $551M, the 2629th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $27.13 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.9%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.9% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.6%); the operating margin is 15.9% (peer median 12.0%).

Valuation It trades at 147.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.5× (most expensive of 5).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 1.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SMC 91Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Summit Midstream against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Summit Midstream financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$583M$562M$430M$459M$370M
Revenue growth—+31%-6%+24%—
Gross profit$154M$150M$113M$123M$89.6M
EBITDA$203M$204M$159M$206M$179M
Net income$7.77M$8.93M-$107M-$38.9M-$102M
Free cash flow$44.8M$44.6M$8.16M$58.0M$68.3M
Capital expenditure$86.3M$89.0M$53.6M$68.9M$30.5M
Total debt$1.24B$1.05B$1.01B$1.48B$1.50B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Summit Midstream competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%3005400006690027000934VH2NGLSMC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Summit Midstream is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×50×100×150×3005400934VH2NGLSMCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Summit Midstream is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%0006690027000934VH2NGLSMCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Summit Midstream is the large dot.

Summit Midstream competitors and peer comparison

How Summit Midstream compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Summit Midstream against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSMCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.0%-9.3%3rd lowest of 8
6-month return-8.9%-14.5%4th highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-25.6%-34.9%3rd highest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.9%-1.6%2nd highest of 7
Operating margin15.9%12.0%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E147.3×11.5×most expensive of 5
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)10.9%3.8%most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.9%+1.8%3rd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.9 pp+5.9 pp3rd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.2 pp+2.4 pp4th lowest of 8
EV / EBITDA10.6×7.7×2nd most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA6.0×-0.9×most indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Summit Midstream SMCUnited States$551M-9%+21%16%147.3×10.9%+7.9%
Sichuan Shudao Equipment and Technology 300540.SZChina$742M-41%-14%8%48.0×n/an/a
GSPL Transmission GSPLTRANS.NSIndia$351Mn/an/a38%n/a7.4%n/a
Jinhong 000669.SZChina$340M-21%0%3%n/a6.4%-11.5%
Xinjiang Wanjing Energy 002700.SZChina$328M-22%-3%11%n/a-6.8%+10.6%
Sinopec Kantons 0934.HKHong Kong$1.31B+3%+10%27%9.2×7.7%+1.8%
Friedrich Vorwerk VH2.DEGermany$1.50B-5%+22%19%11.1×-8.0%+19.3%
NGL Energy Partners LP NGLUnited States$1.87B-8%-22%12%11.9×1.2%-9.6%

Questions

Which companies are Summit Midstream's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sichuan Shudao Equipment and Technology (300540.SZ), GSPL Transmission (GSPLTRANS.NS), Jinhong (000669.SZ), Xinjiang Wanjing Energy (002700.SZ), Sinopec Kantons (0934.HK), Friedrich Vorwerk (VH2.DE), NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL).
Is Summit Midstream expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 147.3× against a peer median of 11.5×, most expensive of 5 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Summit Midstream stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.9% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year +22.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.