Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PRCT PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp.PRCTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Health Care›Medical Specialties
Momentum neutral 47
Mkt cap
$1.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-56.6 pp
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · USD$20.62
1D+1.7%
1W+7.4%
1M+15.2%
3M-5.0%
6M-18.8%
YTD-34.5%
1Y-34.8%
ATR %6.7%
Beta1.00
52w lowhigh45.9% off high

What PROCEPT BioRobotics does

Employees: 888

PROCEPT BioRobotics at a glance

Size PROCEPT BioRobotics (PRCT) is a United States Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $1.18B, the 2144th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $20.62 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.8%, against -5.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.5%); the operating margin is -33.9% (peer median 13.9%).

Valuation It trades at 3.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.2× (4th cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 56.6 points below its cost of capital (9.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 13.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91PRCT 78
Six months, rebased to 100: PROCEPT BioRobotics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PROCEPT BioRobotics financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$337M$308M$224M$136M$75.0M
Revenue growth—+37%+65%+82%—
Gross profit$215M$196M$137M$71.0M$37.1M
EBITDA-$107M-$97.5M-$91.4M-$105M-$76.4M
Net income-$110M-$95.6M-$91.4M-$106M-$87.2M
Free cash flow-$84.9M-$58.3M-$104M-$133M-$83.0M
Capital expenditure$10.6M$9.36M$4.41M$25.2M$2.65M
Total debt$77.5M$78.5M$80.2M$79.2M$77.3M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PROCEPT BioRobotics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%TNDM301021ATEC301101300406688161214150688622600055IRMDSTAA300685688050DRTSSIBN6523688277290650PRCT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PROCEPT BioRobotics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×50×100×TNDM301021ATEC301101300406688161214150688622STAA3006856880506523688277290650PRCTRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. PROCEPT BioRobotics is the large dot.

PROCEPT BioRobotics competitors and peer comparison

How PROCEPT BioRobotics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PROCEPT BioRobotics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePRCTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+15.2%+1.2%5th highest of 21
6-month return-18.8%-5.5%5th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-45.9%-34.5%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.7%+12.5%4th highest of 19
Operating margin-33.9%13.9%3rd lowest of 19
EV / Sales3.0×5.2×4th cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-56.6 pp-0.2 pplowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
PROCEPT BioRobotics PRCTUnited States$1.18B-19%+23%-34%3.0×n/an/a
Tandem Diabetes Care TNDMUnited States$1.18B+9%+4%-4%1.4×n/an/a
Inno Laser Technology 301021.SZChina$1.16B-18%+17%9%12.7×53.9%+8.6%
Alphatec ATECUnited States$1.15B-1%+15%-3%2.0×n/an/a
Mingyue Optical Lens 301101.SZChina$1.14B+6%+14%25%6.8×10.0%+8.8%
Beijing Strong Biotechnologies 300406.SZChina$1.13B+1%-4%36%5.8×1.5%+9.9%
Shandong Weigao Orthopaedic Device 688161.SSChina$1.24B-25%-6%18%5.1×12.7%-3.5%
CLASSYS 214150.KSSouth Korea$1.25B-54%+25%46%4.6×-8.7%+34.5%
Guangzhou Hexin Instrument 688622.SSChina$1.26B+58%-29%-74%99.9×n/an/a
Beijing Wandong Medical Technology 600055.SSChina$1.11B-27%-11%-33%3.4×n/an/a
IRadimed IRMDUnited States$1.10B0%+11%32%11.7×19.1%+21.5%
STAAR Surgical STAAUnited States$1.26B-6%+51%18%3.3×n/an/a
Amoy Diagnostics 300685.SZChina$1.10B-14%+7%34%5.2×6.5%+10.3%
Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) 688050.SSChina$1.27B-15%+21%16%5.2×10.8%+40.3%
Alpha Tau Medical DRTSUnited States$1.27B+61%n/an/an/an/an/a
Freenome FRNMUnited States$1.09Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
SI-BONE SIBNUnited States$1.09B+98%+14%-8%4.5×n/an/a
PHC 6523.TJapan$1.09B+36%+3%7%1.0×-2.3%+3.6%
Tinavi Medical Technologies 688277.SSChina$1.08B-30%-2%-59%26.9×n/an/a
INKON Life Technology 300143.SZChina$1.08B-14%+22%12%3.4×12.4%+12.9%
L&C BIO 290650.KSSouth Korea$1.07B-17%+53%17%12.8×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are PROCEPT BioRobotics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Tandem Diabetes Care (TNDM), Inno Laser Technology (301021.SZ), Alphatec (ATEC), Mingyue Optical Lens (301101.SZ), Beijing Strong Biotechnologies (300406.SZ), Shandong Weigao Orthopaedic Device (688161.SS), CLASSYS (214150.KS), Guangzhou Hexin Instrument (688622.SS).
Is PROCEPT BioRobotics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.0× against a peer median of 5.2×, 4th cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has PROCEPT BioRobotics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.8% against -5.5% for the median peer; over one year -34.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.