Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › POL.OL Polaris Media ASAOpen in the cockpit ↗

Polaris Media ASAPOL.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Communication Services›Publishing: Newspapers
Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$307M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
13%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10,610
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.1 pp
WACC 5.7%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · NOKNOK 58.20
1D-1.4%
1W+0.7%
1M-1.4%
3M-3.0%
6M+3.6%
YTD+6.8%
1Y+15.2%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh9.9% off high

What Polaris Media does

Employees: 2,495

Polaris Media at a glance

Size Polaris Media (POL.OL) is a Norway Communication Services company (Publishing: Newspapers) with a market value of $307M, the 113th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 58.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 3.6%, against -2.8% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.2% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.1%); the operating margin is 2.0% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 0.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (3rd cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.1 points below its cost of capital (5.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9510010511011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026POL.OL 100Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Polaris Media against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Polaris Media financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 3.42BNOK 3.43BNOK 3.38BNOK 3.42BNOK 3.41B
Revenue growth—+1%-1%0%—
Gross profitNOK 818MNOK 782MNOK 764MNOK 681MNOK 708M
EBITDANOK 297MNOK 148MNOK 184MNOK 183MNOK 316M
Net incomeNOK 10.5MNOK 7.50MNOK 678M-NOK 47.0MNOK 48.1M
Free cash flowNOK 204MNOK 171MNOK 834MNOK 104MNOK 185M
Capital expenditureNOK 59.5MNOK 70.8MNOK 71.1MNOK 75.3MNOK 88.4M
Total debtNOK 532MNOK 557MNOK 633MNOK 1.24BNOK 1.01B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Polaris Media competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%-5%0%+5%CEDTCL-ARCS000607DJCOTDAYPOL.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Polaris Media is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%2×4×CEDTCL-ARCS000607DJCOTDAYPOL.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Polaris Media is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%CEDTCL-ARCS000607DJCOTDAYPOL.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Polaris Media is the large dot.

Polaris Media competitors and peer comparison

How Polaris Media compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Polaris Media against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePOL.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.4%-0.1%3rd lowest of 7
6-month return+3.6%-2.8%3rd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-9.9%-25.0%3rd highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.2%-4.1%3rd highest of 7
Operating margin2.0%6.6%3rd lowest of 7
EV / Sales0.8×1.9×3rd cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.5%-3.5%2nd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.2%-1.1%3rd highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.3 pp-1.2 pp2nd most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.1 pp-0.4 pp3rd lowest of 6
EV / EBITDA8.7×6.0×2nd most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA-1.3×1.2×2nd least indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Polaris Media POL.OLNorway$307M+4%0%2%0.8×11.5%+1.2%
Caltagirone Editore CED.MIItaly$309M+19%-6%-19%2.9×-11.8%-3.3%
Transcontinental TCL-A.TOCanada$338M0%-43%11%0.6×-12.6%+1.3%
RCS MediaGroup RCS.MIItaly$484M-15%-3%8%0.7×-5.9%+1.0%
Zhejiang Huamei 000607.SZChina$598M-5%+3%-23%3.6×-1.2%-5.7%
Daily Journal DJCOUnited States$885M+28%+23%13%4.8×22.0%+11.9%
USA TODAY TDAYUnited States$965M-14%-7%6%0.9×9.8%-7.5%

Questions

Which companies are Polaris Media's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Caltagirone Editore (CED.MI), Transcontinental (TCL-A.TO), RCS MediaGroup (RCS.MI), Zhejiang Huamei (000607.SZ), Daily Journal (DJCO), USA TODAY (TDAY).
Is Polaris Media expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.8× against a peer median of 1.9×, 3rd cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Polaris Media stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +3.6% against -2.8% for the median peer; over one year +15.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.