Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PLSV.OL Paratus Energy Services Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Paratus Energy Services Ltd.PLSV.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Industrials›Miscellaneous
Momentum weak 33
Mkt cap
$833M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.17M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.3 pp
WACC 5.4%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
21 days
27 Nov 2026
Close · NOKNOK 47.50
1D-1.4%
1W-4.6%
1M+0.5%
3M-3.5%
6M-6.5%
YTD+7.6%
1Y+15.8%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh9.5% off high

What Paratus Energy Services does

No business profile yet.

Paratus Energy Services at a glance

Size Paratus Energy Services (PLSV.OL) is a Norway Industrials company (Miscellaneous) with a market value of $833M, the 68th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 47.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.5%, against -10.7% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 5 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 57.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.9%); the operating margin is 23.4% (peer median 33.1%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings.

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.3 points below its cost of capital (5.4% WACC).

Credit Paratus Energy Services has 2 bonds outstanding ($604M) and trading like B+ at a weighted spread of 335 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 27 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026PLSV.OL 93Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Paratus Energy Services against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Paratus Energy Services financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 801MNOK 1.59BNOK 2.30BNOK 1.76BNOK 1.42B
Revenue growth—-31%+30%+24%—
Gross profitNOK 267MNOK 472MNOK 1.08BNOK 609MNOK 423M
EBITDANOK 309MNOK 613MNOK 1.07BNOK 520MNOK 1.16B
Net incomeNOK 835MNOK 777MNOK 340M-NOK 241M-NOK 346M
Free cash flowNOK 1.49BNOK 2.39B-NOK 1.04B-NOK 284MNOK 2.24B
Capital expenditureNOK 43.5MNOK 61.3MNOK 82.8MNOK 123MNOK 0
Total debtNOK 7.29BNOK 6.91BNOK 7.86BNOK 6.66BNOK 6.42B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Paratus Energy Services competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%-5%0%547AQRCALHGASHIKAGPLSV.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Paratus Energy Services is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-60%-40%-20%0%6×8×10×12×547AALHGPLSV.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Paratus Energy Services is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0%100%200%QRCALHGASHIKAGPLSV.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Paratus Energy Services is the large dot.

Paratus Energy Services competitors and peer comparison

How Paratus Energy Services compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Paratus Energy Services against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePLSV.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.5%-4.3%3rd highest of 6
6-month return-6.5%-10.7%3rd highest of 5
Distance from 52-week high-9.5%-32.0%2nd highest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)-57.9%+22.9%lowest of 5
Operating margin23.4%33.1%3rd highest of 5
Forward P/E11.4×n/a—
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.9%20.4%2nd least demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.8%+186.3%lowest of 4
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+12.1 pp-159.6 ppmost demanding of 4
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.3 pp-2.1 pp2nd lowest of 5
EV / EBITDA44.7×12.8×most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA19.7×1.7×2nd most indebted of 5
Bond spread335 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Paratus Energy Services PLSV.OLNorway$833M-6%-58%23%11.4×15.9%+3.8%
Muninova 547A.TJapan$1.19B-16%+13%17%5.6×n/an/a
Queen's Road Capital Investment QRC.TOCanada$523M-16%+33%759%n/a20.4%+83.0%
Hanwha Machinery & Service 0220W0.KSSouth Korea$436Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Louis Hachette ALHG.PAFrance$1.97B+12%+3%4%12.1×-1.2%+210.9%
Ashika Global Securities ASHIKAG.NSIndia$339M-6%+4,121%49%n/a26.7%+186.3%

Paratus Energy Services bonds and credit

Paratus Energy Services has 2 bonds outstanding with $604M face value. Weighted yield 7.94%, a spread of 335 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Which companies are Paratus Energy Services's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Muninova (547A.T), Queen's Road Capital Investment (QRC.TO), Hanwha Machinery & Service (0220W0.KS), Louis Hachette (ALHG.PA), Ashika Global Securities (ASHIKAG.NS).
How has Paratus Energy Services stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.5% against -10.7% for the median peer; over one year +15.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.