Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MTX Minerals Technologies Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Minerals Technologies Inc.MTXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Processes specialty minerals (limestone, bentonite) for paper, environmental and household/personal care applications.

Momentum weak 26
Mkt cap
$1.91B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.1 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$61.63
1D-1.5%
1W-1.8%
1M-4.7%
3M-17.2%
6M-22.5%
YTD+1.1%
1Y+9.2%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.67
52w lowhigh26.9% off high

What Minerals Technologies does

Processes specialty minerals (limestone, bentonite) for paper, environmental and household/personal care applications.

Sells minerals by volume. Precipitated calcium carbonate, a filler made from limestone, is produced in plants built beside paper mills under long contracts, so a mill's output sets its volume. The 2014 purchase of AMCOL added bentonite clay for pet litter, drilling fluids and metal-casting moulds. Declining printing-paper demand pushes it toward packaging and other uses.

Products and services

  • Specialty minerals (PCC for paper/packaging)
  • Household, personal care and specialty products
  • Environmental/industrial minerals

Customers

  • Paper/packaging manufacturers
  • Household/personal care product makers
  • Industrial/environmental customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Chemicals: Specialty
  • Specialty minerals processing

What could go right

  • Packaging/paper industry mineral demand
  • Environmental remediation project growth

What could go wrong

  • Paper industry structural decline
  • Mining and raw material cost inflation

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base, customer qualification). On-site precipitated calcium carbonate satellite plants at paper mills create sticky, long-term customer relationships.

Headquarters: New York City, US · Founded: 1992 · Employees: 3,782

Named competitors

  • Imerys NK.PA
  • Omya private or unlisted

Minerals Technologies at a glance

Size Minerals Technologies (MTX) is a United States Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $1.91B, the 1826th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $61.63 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 22.5%, against -28.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.1%); the operating margin is 12.9% (peer median 7.1%).

Valuation It trades at 9.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.1× (3rd cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points above its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MTX 77Peer median 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Minerals Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Minerals Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.17B$2.07B$2.12B$2.17B$2.13B
Revenue growth—-2%-2%+2%—
Gross profit$519M$507M$536M$494M$452M
EBITDA$392M$392M$393M$387M$356M
Net income-$67.6M-$18.4M$167M$84.1M$122M
Free cash flow$129M$86.6M$147M$140M$23.4M
Capital expenditure$107M$107M$89.5M$93.5M$82.3M
Total debt$958M$1.01B$1.02B$1.07B$1.12B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Minerals Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%603823688268CC0022504208GRWRHITECHVBK00136900240800201030121960390601894368300655601568603938011790MTX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Minerals Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×200×603823688268CC0022504208GRWRHITECHVBK002408002010301219603906688005300655MTXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Minerals Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%603823688268CC002250GRWRHITECHVBK00240801894368601568MTXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Minerals Technologies is the large dot.

Minerals Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MTX vs NK.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Minerals Technologies MTX$1.91B-22%+5%13%9.8×0.5%
Imerys NK.PA$2.41B+11%-2%6%15.4×7.4%

How Minerals Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Minerals Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMTXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.7%-13.3%6th highest of 21
6-month return-22.5%-28.3%9th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-26.9%-54.0%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.8%+18.1%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin12.9%7.1%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E9.8×16.1×3rd cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.5%10.1%3rd least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.4%+6.4%5th lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.9 pp+8.7 pp4th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.1 pp-1.4 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA6.4×10.9×2nd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.5×-1.0×3rd most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Minerals Technologies MTXUnited States$1.91B-22%+5%13%9.8×0.5%+5.4%
Lily 603823.SSChina$1.91B+85%+2%10%58.1×27.9%+1.4%
Guangdong Huate Gas 688268.SSChina$1.92B-47%+27%13%56.1×35.6%+7.2%
Chemours CCUnited States$1.92B-45%-1%3%8.2×16.1%+3.2%
Standard Nuclear STDNUnited States$1.90Bn/an/a-288%n/an/an/a
Lianhe Chemical Technology 002250.SZChina$1.90B-16%+28%13%19.7×-3.4%+6.1%
Ube 4208.TJapan$1.94B+33%+3%4%12.0×n/an/a
Garware Hi-Tech Films GRWRHITECH.NSIndia$1.88B+40%+15%21%37.7×38.8%+16.6%
Verbio VBK.DEGermany$1.88B-37%+19%5%13.2×1.1%+12.8%
Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material 001369.SZChina$1.87B-28%+3%15%n/an/an/a
Zibo Qixiang Tengda Chemical 002408.SZChina$1.87B-33%+18%-1%220.0×3.7%-0.8%
Transfar Zhilian 002010.SZChina$1.87B-21%-30%5%16.1×n/an/a
Ganzhou Teng Yuan Cobalt New Material 301219.SZChina$1.85B-53%+64%10%12.5×n/an/a
Jiangsu Lopal Tech 603906.SSChina$1.82B-54%+96%7%14.7×n/an/a
Dongyue 0189.HKHong Kong$2.04B-28%+8%19%5.6×-12.4%+6.6%
Fuso Chemical 4368.TJapan$1.79B-19%+17%26%13.1×8.4%+12.8%
Ningbo Ronbay New Energy Technology 688005.SSChina$2.05B-45%+41%1%37.8×n/an/a
Crystal Clear Electronic Material 300655.SZChina$1.75B-25%+27%7%78.2×n/an/a
Shaanxi Beiyuan Chemical Industry 601568.SSChina$2.11B-9%-8%-4%11.8×11.8%-1.8%
Tangshan SunFar Silicon Industries 603938.SSChina$1.72B+6%+30%8%42.8×n/an/a
SKC 011790.KSSouth Korea$2.14B-46%+24%-9%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Minerals Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Imerys (NK.PA), Omya (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Lily (603823.SS), Guangdong Huate Gas (688268.SS), Chemours (CC), Standard Nuclear (STDN), Lianhe Chemical Technology (002250.SZ), Ube (4208.T).
Is Minerals Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.8× against a peer median of 16.1×, 3rd cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Minerals Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -22.5% against -28.3% for the median peer; over one year +9.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.