Loading…

LennarLENCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Homebuilding

One of the largest US homebuilders, constructing single-family homes and increasingly land-light developments.

Momentum strong 70
Mkt cap
$21.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$346M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-5.1 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
40 days
16 Dec 2026
Close · USD$88.74
1D-3.1%
1W+2.1%
1M+14.4%
3M+3.7%
6M+0.4%
YTD-12.8%
1Y-26.1%
ATR %4.1%
Beta0.88
52w lowhigh33.0% off high

What Lennar does

One of the largest US homebuilders, constructing single-family homes and increasingly land-light developments.

Builds and sells homes, bundling features into a single price, and uses mortgage incentives to move volume; its own mortgage and title businesses earn from many of its buyers. In 2025 it spun off Millrose Properties, which buys land and sells finished lots back to Lennar, so Lennar owns far less land than rivals. The 2018 CalAtlantic purchase made it one of the largest US builders.

Products and services

  • Single-family homes
  • Land-light/land-banking model
  • Mortgage & title services
  • Multifamily (via ventures)

Customers

  • US homebuyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Homebuilding
  • Residential land development…
  • Mortgage & title financing (Lennar…

What could go right

  • Housing demand/household formation growth
  • Land-light model freeing capital for buybacks

What could go wrong

  • Mortgage rate/affordability headwinds
  • Construction cost/labor inflation

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage). National scale and shift toward asset-light land strategy lowers capital intensity versus peers.

Headquarters: Miami, Florida, US · Founded: 1954 · Employees: 12,532

Named competitors

Lennar at a glance

Size Lennar (LEN) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Homebuilding) with a market value of $21.1B, the 480th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $88.74 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.4%, against +11.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 8.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.4%); the operating margin is 5.4% (peer median 12.1%).

Valuation It trades at 18.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.4× (2nd most expensive of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.1 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Credit Lennar has 5 bonds outstanding ($2.35B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 90 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 11.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 114LEN 102
Six months, rebased to 100: Lennar against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Lennar financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-11-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$32.0B$34.1B$35.5B$34.3B$33.7B
Revenue growth—-4%+3%+2%—
Gross profit$5.14B$6.01B$8.01B$8.23B$9.20B
EBITDA$1.88B$2.75B$4.92B$5.53B$6.85B
Net income$1.30B$2.06B$3.89B$3.89B$4.56B
Free cash flow$1.04B$310M$2.46B$5.18B$3.61B
Capital expenditure$126M$189M$172M$99.8M$57.2M
Total debt$6.12B$6.14B$4.45B$5.14B$6.36B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lennar competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+5%+10%+15%+20%PHMNVRTOLDHIFTDRBTRW3288PSNLEN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lennar is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×15×PHMNVRTOLDHIFTDRBTRW3288PSNLENRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lennar is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%0%10%PHMNVRTOLDHIFTDRBTRW3288LENGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lennar is the large dot.

Lennar competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lennar LEN$21.1B0%-8%5%18.9×11.4%
D. R. Horton DHI$41.3B+3%-4%11%17.4×7.8%
PulteGroup PHM$24.4B+13%-9%15%14.3×4.7%
NVR NVR$16.8B+5%-10%13%18.6×4.0%

How Lennar compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lennar against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLENPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+14.4%+12.6%3rd highest of 9
6-month return+0.4%+11.8%2nd lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-33.0%-13.4%2nd lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)-8.0%+2.4%3rd lowest of 9
Operating margin5.4%12.1%lowest of 9
Forward P/E18.9×14.4×2nd most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.4%4.1%2nd most demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.7%+7.3%4th highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.6 pp-2.5 pp3rd most demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.1 pp+2.4 pp3rd lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA13.7×9.8×most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA2.5×1.0×2nd most indebted of 8
Bond spread90 bp86 bpwidest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lennar LENUnited States$21.1B0%-8%5%18.9×11.4%+8.7%
PulteGroup PHMUnited States$24.4B+13%-9%15%14.3×4.7%+9.4%
NVR NVRUnited States$16.8B+5%-10%13%18.6×4.0%+6.5%
Toll Brothers TOLUnited States$14.1B+11%-1%14%11.5×4.1%+9.2%
D. R. Horton DHIUnited States$41.3B+3%-4%11%17.4×7.8%+3.5%
Frontdoor FTDRUnited States$6.69B+50%+9%20%19.0×12.2%+7.3%
Barratt Redrow BTRW.LUnited Kingdom$6.07B+32%+9%9%14.5×3.3%+4.7%
Open House 3288.TJapan$5.66B-15%+6%12%7.3×-8.1%+18.2%
Persimmon PSN.LUnited Kingdom$5.64B+22%+17%11%13.0×n/an/a

Lennar bonds and credit

Lennar has 5 bonds outstanding with $2.35B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.38%, a spread of 90 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Lennar's main competitors?
Named competitors: D.R. Horton (DHI), PulteGroup (PHM), NVR (NVR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes PulteGroup (PHM), NVR (NVR), Toll Brothers (TOL), D. R. Horton (DHI), Frontdoor (FTDR), Barratt Redrow (BTRW.L).
Is Lennar expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.9× against a peer median of 14.4×, 2nd most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Lennar stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.4% against +11.8% for the median peer; over one year -26.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.