Loading…

Quaker HoughtonKWRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Makes industrial process fluids (lubricants, coolants) used in metalworking and steel manufacturing.

Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$2.58B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.5 pp
WACC 10.2%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$150.02
1D-1.6%
1W-0.6%
1M-5.1%
3M-12.7%
6M+1.7%
YTD+9.3%
1Y+11.4%
ATR %3.6%
Beta1.25
52w lowhigh18.0% off high

What Quaker Houghton does

Makes industrial process fluids (lubricants, coolants) used in metalworking and steel manufacturing.

Sells fluids that customers consume continuously in their plants, so revenue repeats with their output, and its own technical staff often manage the fluids on site, paid through the product price. The 2019 merger with Houghton International created the present company and gave it a global footprint.

Products and services

  • Metalworking fluids
  • Steel/metal manufacturing chemicals
  • Offshore/other industrial fluids

Customers

  • Steel and metal manufacturers
  • Automotive/aerospace parts makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Chemicals: Specialty
  • Industrial process fluids

What could go right

  • Global steel and metal production demand
  • Technical service-driven customer retention

What could go wrong

  • Steel and metal manufacturing cyclicality
  • Raw material (base oil) cost swings

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification, switching costs). Deep technical service relationships embedded in customer manufacturing processes create switching costs.

Headquarters: Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, US · Founded: 1918 · Employees: 4,700

Named competitors

Quaker Houghton at a glance

Size Quaker Houghton (KWR) is a United States Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $2.58B, the 1633rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $150.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.7%, against -14.0% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.0%); the operating margin is 9.1% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 16.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.7× (9th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points below its cost of capital (10.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 10.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026KWR 105Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Quaker Houghton against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Quaker Houghton financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.03B$1.89B$1.84B$1.95B$1.94B
Revenue growth—+3%-6%+1%—
Gross profit$660M$616M$628M$647M$555M
EBITDA$287M$270M$285M$304M$238M
Net income$97.0M-$2.47M$116M$112M-$15.8M
Free cash flow$39.4M$80.6M$163M$240M$13.3M
Capital expenditure$54.7M$55.9M$41.8M$38.8M$28.5M
Total debt$940M$906M$738M$789M$992M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Quaker Houghton competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%603067600339KEMIRA7988002895688363SDF4202300821600623PIIND0025680027683000733012864118600500002145DEEPAKNTR688778KWR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Quaker Houghton is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×603067600339KEMIRA7988002895688363PIIND002568300073301286DEEPAKNTR688778KWRRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Quaker Houghton is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%KEMIRA798800289568836342023008216006230025683012864118600500688778KWRGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Quaker Houghton is the large dot.

Quaker Houghton competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KWR vs BP vs HEN.DE vs 5019.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Quaker Houghton KWR$2.58B+2%+9%9%16.9×16.3%
BP PLC Sponsored ADR BP$119B+3%+26%14%6.6×n/a
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA HEN.DE$35.4B+25%-3%15%13.6×-1.9%
Idemitsu Kosan 5019.T$9.54B-9%-3%6%7.1×-12.8%

How Quaker Houghton compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Quaker Houghton against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKWRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.1%-6.8%8th highest of 21
6-month return+1.7%-14.0%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-18.0%-34.8%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.7%+8.0%9th highest of 21
Operating margin9.1%8.6%10th highest of 20
Forward P/E16.9×17.7×9th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.3%9.0%4th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+8.3%3rd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.3 pp-0.3 pp5th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.5 pp-1.1 pp4th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA11.7×7.1×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×1.2×2nd most indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Quaker Houghton KWRUnited States$2.58B+2%+9%9%16.9×16.3%+5.9%
Hubei Zhenhua Chemical 603067.SSChina$2.56B-35%+31%11%23.6×n/an/a
China Petroleum Engineering 600339.SSChina$2.60B-24%+8%1%26.7×n/an/a
Kemira KEMIRA.HEFinland$2.55B-8%-3%8%16.0×3.9%+2.6%
Nifco 7988.TJapan$2.62B+6%+4%14%11.7×-3.5%+6.6%
Guizhou Chanhen Chemical 002895.SZChina$2.64B-20%+15%18%12.9×2.4%+36.1%
Bloomage Biotechnology 688363.SSChina$2.49B-16%-22%5%55.6×20.8%+9.8%
K+s SDF.DEGermany$2.68B-13%+6%34%11.7×n/an/a
Daicel 4202.TJapan$2.48B+24%+2%7%11.1×6.1%+8.1%
Shandong Dongyue Silicone Material 300821.SZChina$2.43B-11%+13%13%n/a20.7%+8.6%
Shanghai Huayi 600623.SSChina$2.41B-24%+5%n/a14.8×-11.1%+10.3%
PI Industries PIIND.NSIndia$2.79B-44%-15%13%22.7×n/an/a
Shanghai Bairun Investment 002568.SZChina$2.82B-8%+8%28%24.2×14.5%+8.8%
Qingdao Gon Technology 002768.SZChina$2.83B+48%+15%7%17.7×n/an/a
Beijing Easpring Material Technology 300073.SZChina$2.86B-45%+116%5%18.8×n/an/a
Sichuan Qiaoyuan Gas 301286.SZChina$2.88B-4%+8%26%73.4×31.8%+8.0%
Kaneka 4118.TJapan$2.30B+23%+4%5%11.6×4.9%+7.0%
Sinochem International 600500.SSChina$2.27B-7%-5%-1%n/a11.9%-2.7%
Tinergy Chemical 002145.SZChina$2.23B-15%+17%9%n/an/an/a
Deepak Nitrite DEEPAKNTR.NSIndia$2.22B-17%+25%14%16.5×n/an/a
XTC New Energy Materials (Xiamen) 688778.SSChina$3.01B-52%+78%4%19.2×16.0%+20.0%

Questions

Who are Quaker Houghton's main competitors?
Named competitors: Fuchs Petrolub (private or unlisted), Castrol (BP) (BP), Henkel (HEN.DE), Idemitsu Kosan (5019.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hubei Zhenhua Chemical (603067.SS), China Petroleum Engineering (600339.SS), Kemira (KEMIRA.HE), Nifco (7988.T), Guizhou Chanhen Chemical (002895.SZ), Bloomage Biotechnology (688363.SS).
Is Quaker Houghton expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.9× against a peer median of 17.7×, 9th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Quaker Houghton stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.7% against -14.0% for the median peer; over one year +11.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.