Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › KPL.NS Kwality Pharmaceuticals LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kwality Pharmaceuticals LtdKPL.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Pharma & Healthcare›Pharmaceuticals: Major
Momentum leader 98
Mkt cap
$401M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
23%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.05M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+13.9 pp
WACC 12.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹3,645
1D-1.1%
1W+4.9%
1M-1.0%
3M+37.4%
6M+111.0%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %4.9%
52w lowhigh7.7% off high

What Kwality Pharmaceuticals does

Employees: 1,137

Kwality Pharmaceuticals at a glance

Size Kwality Pharmaceuticals (KPL.NS) is an India Health Care company (Pharmaceuticals: Major) with a market value of $401M, the 938th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹3,645 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 111.0%, against -15.9% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 37.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 20.8% (peer median -11.8%).

Valuation It trades at 6.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.2× (7th most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.9 points above its cost of capital (12.2% WACC).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026KPL.NS 209Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Kwality Pharmaceuticals against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kwality Pharmaceuticals financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹5.54B₹5.03B₹3.70B₹3.07B₹2.51B
Revenue growth—+36%+21%+22%—
Gross profit₹1.89B₹1.44B₹999M₹750M₹754M
EBITDA₹1.35B₹1.21B₹834M₹696M₹630M
Net income₹811M₹673M₹398M₹238M₹194M
Free cash flown/a-₹387M₹188M₹24.7M-₹61.7M
Capital expendituren/a₹489M₹288M₹306M₹504M
Total debtn/a₹1.31B₹1.12B₹981M₹903M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kwality Pharmaceuticals competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%048410301111301089001060002581ZOTA4592219A002872HNSA00286430045230063642CRLMDMPLT4552PBYIKPL.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kwality Pharmaceuticals is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0×50×100×150×048410301111301089001060002581ZOTA219AHNSA00286442CASMBKPL.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kwality Pharmaceuticals is the large dot.

Kwality Pharmaceuticals competitors and peer comparison

How Kwality Pharmaceuticals compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kwality Pharmaceuticals against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKPL.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.0%-11.1%5th highest of 21
6-month return+111.0%-15.9%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.7%-39.8%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+37.9%+8.6%6th highest of 18
Operating margin20.8%-11.8%highest of 18
EV / Sales6.8×5.2×7th most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.9 pp-7.1 pp3rd highest of 15
EV / EBITDA28.0×10.5×2nd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×-0.2×3rd most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Kwality Pharmaceuticals KPL.NSIndia$401M+111%+38%21%6.8×n/an/a
Hyundai Bioscience 048410.KSSouth Korea$401M-58%+78%-580%158.2×n/an/a
Guangdong Lifestrong Pharmacy 301111.SZChina$401M-16%+7%-2%7.9×n/an/a
Tuoxin Pharmaceutical 301089.SZChina$400M-22%+17%-20%5.8×n/an/a
JW Pharmaceutical 001060.KSSouth Korea$402M-28%+10%14%0.7×-16.9%+7.2%
Shandong Sinobioway Biomedicine 002581.SZChina$404M-40%+91%-65%7.8×n/an/a
Zota Health Care ZOTA.NSIndia$395M-6%+69%-16%5.8×n/an/a
SanBio 4592.TJapan$393M-58%n/an/an/an/an/a
Heartseed 219A.TJapan$393M+52%+197%9%21.4×50.0%+73.2%
Tiansheng Pharmaceutical 002872.SZChina$392M+15%-1%-13%5.2×23.2%-15.7%
Hansa Biopharma HNSA.STSweden$410M+39%-4%-304%23.7×n/an/a
Shaanxi Panlong Pharmaceutical 002864.SZChina$411M-13%-9%9%1.6×-0.4%+11.2%
Anhui Sunhere Pharmaceutical Excipients 300452.SZChina$412M-16%+9%19%2.4×-4.5%+12.1%
Jiangxi Synergy Pharmaceutical 300636.SZChina$414M-16%-2%3%3.5×n/an/a
iX Biopharma 42C.SISingapore$386M+10%-12%-140%70.7×n/an/a
Assembly Biosciences ASMBUnited States$416M-31%+125%-12%1.3×n/an/a
Relmada Therapeutics RLMDUnited States$416M-47%n/an/an/an/an/a
MapLight Therapeutics MPLTUnited States$385M-75%n/an/an/an/an/a
JCR Pharmaceuticals 4552.TJapan$383M-11%+3%-14%2.9×n/an/a
Dong-A Socio 000640.KSSouth Korea$425M-11%+10%7%0.7×-8.8%+12.8%
Puma Biotechnology PBYIUnited States$426M+10%-3%13%1.5×2.8%+0.3%

Questions

Which companies are Kwality Pharmaceuticals's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hyundai Bioscience (048410.KS), Guangdong Lifestrong Pharmacy (301111.SZ), Tuoxin Pharmaceutical (301089.SZ), JW Pharmaceutical (001060.KS), Shandong Sinobioway Biomedicine (002581.SZ), Zota Health Care (ZOTA.NS), SanBio (4592.T), Heartseed (219A.T).
Is Kwality Pharmaceuticals expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.8× against a peer median of 5.2×, 7th most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Kwality Pharmaceuticals stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +111.0% against -15.9% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.