Loading…

Enea SAENA.WACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Poland · PLN·Utilities›Electric Utilities

Polish state-controlled electric utility operating coal and renewable generation, distribution and retail electricity sales in western Poland.

≈ A Polish state-controlled electric utility (generation & distribution)Momentum neutral 44
Mkt cap
$2.80B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
48%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.62M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
138 days
24 Mar 2027
Close · PLNPLN 20.72
1D-2.1%
1W-1.8%
1M-2.7%
3M-0.7%
6M-3.1%
YTD+6.4%
1Y-4.1%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh23.3% off high

What Enea does

Polish state-controlled electric utility operating coal and renewable generation, distribution and retail electricity sales in western Poland.

Distribution earns a regulated return set by the energy regulator on its grid assets, generation sells power into the wholesale market, and retail sells to end customers. The Polish state controls it. Its Bogdanka mine supplies coal to its own power plants, tying generation to coal.

In one line: A Polish state-controlled electric utility (generation & distribution).

Products and services

  • Electricity distribution
  • Power generation (coal & renewables)
  • Electricity retail sales
  • Captive coal mining (Bogdanka)

Customers

  • Residential and business electricity customers in

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Electric power generation
  • Distribution & retail sales

What could go right

  • Regulated distribution returns
  • Offshore wind project development

What could go wrong

  • Coal asset transition/carbon cost risk
  • Capex-heavy grid investment needs

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Regulated distribution grid monopoly plus captive coal mining, though facing energy-transition costs.

Headquarters: Poznan, Poland · Founded: 2007 · Employees: 17,814

Named competitors

Enea at a glance

Size Enea (ENA.WA) is a Poland Utilities company (Electric Utilities) with a market value of $2.80B, the 28th largest of 83 Poland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at PLN 20.72 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.1%, against -14.0% for the median peer and +14.3% for the Poland market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 10.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.1%).

Valuation It trades at 4.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.9× (cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Next results Next results expected around 24 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ENA.WA 101Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Enea against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Enea financials

Reported figures in PLN; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenuePLN 26.3BPLN 28.1BPLN 33.0BPLN 48.2BPLN 30.1B
Revenue growth—-15%-32%+60%—
Gross profitn/aPLN 5.18BPLN 6.35BPLN 8.31BPLN 1.64B
EBITDAn/aPLN 5.83BPLN 6.94BPLN 5.99BPLN 2.22B
Net incomePLN 1.19BPLN 1.82BPLN 1.40B-PLN 704MPLN 45.3M
Free cash flown/aPLN 1.47BPLN 1.97B-PLN 894M-PLN 1.51B
Capital expendituren/aPLN 5.95BPLN 3.06BPLN 2.94BPLN 2.59B
Total debtn/aPLN 7.62BPLN 7.58BPLN 8.07BPLN 5.49B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Enea competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%003035KEN601016MGEE6001310005430007919504002015OTTRSJVN000875AVA9507MVV1600396IRE600098000539ENA.WA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Enea is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×003035601016MGEE6001310005430007919504002015OTTRSJVN000875AVA9507NLCINDIAENA.WARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Enea is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%003035601016600131000543000791000875600098000539ENA.WAGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Enea is the large dot.

Enea competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ENA.WA vs TPE.WA vs ENG.WA vs PGE.WA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Enea ENA.WA$2.80B-3%-11%n/a4.4×-7.7%
TAURON Polska Energia TPE.WA$4.02B-6%0%n/a6.1×17.0%
Energa ENG.WAn/a+48%n/an/an/an/a
PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna PGE.WA$9.02B+47%-2%12%5.5×n/a

How Enea compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Enea against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureENA.WAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.7%-3.8%10th highest of 21
6-month return-3.1%-14.0%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.3%-37.2%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-10.7%+0.1%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E4.4×14.9×cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.7%2.0%2nd least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.1%+10.4%4th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.8 pp-6.4 pp2nd least demanding of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Enea ENA.WAPoland$2.80B-3%-11%n/a4.4×-7.7%+9.1%
China Southern Power Grid Energy Efficiency & Clean Energy 003035.SZChina$2.89B-31%+10%18%39.1×11.6%+12.9%
Kenon KENUnited States$2.99B-35%+53%8%n/an/an/a
CECEP Wind-Power 601016.SSChina$3.00B-28%-8%24%30.7×2.0%+11.0%
MGE Energy MGEEUnited States$3.03B+9%+8%23%19.0×n/an/a
State Grid Information & Communication 600131.SSChina$2.55B-17%+13%6%21.2×7.0%+8.7%
An Hui Wenergy 000543.SZChina$2.52B-8%-18%11%9.2×1.3%+10.4%
GEPIC Energy Development 000791.SZChina$3.23B-18%-30%40%10.2×-7.8%+32.3%
Chugoku Electric Power 9504.TJapan$2.41B+18%0%0%9.3×n/an/a
GCL Energy Technology 002015.SZChina$3.27B-24%-3%15%21.5×n/an/a
Otter Tail OTTRUnited States$3.29B-11%+1%23%14.6×n/an/a
SJVN SJVN.NSIndia$2.38B-28%+99%48%15.9×n/an/a
SPIC Green Energy 000875.SZChina$2.34B-34%-4%16%35.0×-0.2%+5.6%
Avista AVAUnited States$3.37B-1%-1%19%15.0×n/an/a
Shikoku Electric Power 9507.TJapan$2.33B+24%-3%6%9.8×n/an/a
NLC India NLCINDIA.NSIndia$3.50B-28%+17%18%9.9×n/an/a
MVV Energie MVV1.DEGermany$2.23B+1%-8%4%n/an/an/a
Huadian Liaoning Energy Development 600396.SSChina$2.23B+2%0%8%n/an/an/a
Iren IRE.MIItaly$3.54B-9%-8%9%10.6×5.5%+12.0%
Guangzhou Development 600098.SSChina$3.56B-3%+4%4%14.9×-1.0%+9.9%
Guangdong Electric Power Development 000539.SZChina$3.64B-21%+8%-1%n/a9.8%+8.9%

Questions

Who are Enea's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tauron Polska Energia (TPE.WA), Energa (ENG.WA), PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna (PGE.WA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Southern Power Grid Energy Efficiency & Clean Energy (003035.SZ), Kenon (KEN), CECEP Wind-Power (601016.SS), MGE Energy (MGEE), State Grid Information & Communication (600131.SS), An Hui Wenergy (000543.SZ).
Is Enea expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.4× against a peer median of 14.9×, cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Enea stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.1% against -14.0% for the median peer; over one year -4.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.