Loading…

Dakota Gold CorpDCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Precious Metals
Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$798M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
85%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.65M
20-day average traded
P/B
4.34×
price to book
ROE
-23.4%
delivered
Implied ROE
38.7%
what the price asks
Next earnings
26 days
2 Dec 2026
Close · USD$5.95
1D+5.9%
1W+17.4%
1M+0.7%
3M-2.9%
6M-1.0%
YTD+4.8%
1Y+49.5%
ATR %5.9%
Beta2.24
52w lowhigh17.9% off high

What Dakota Gold does

Employees: 41

Dakota Gold at a glance

Size Dakota Gold (DC) is a United States Materials company (Precious Metals) with a market value of $798M, the 2395th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $5.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.0%, against -18.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Valuation It trades at 4.34× book value against a peer median of 2.65× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 38.7%; Dakota Gold delivers -23.4%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Short interest Short interest is 5.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026DC 93Peer median 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Dakota Gold against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dakota Gold financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2021
Revenue$0$0$0$0$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profit-$204,371-$198,764-$254,978-$302,078-$134,004
EBITDA-$38.1M-$30.6M-$34.1M-$37.7M-$31.1M
Net income-$36.1M-$29.5M-$33.9M-$36.4M-$12.6M
Free cash flow-$34.0M-$25.8M-$32.1M-$32.9M-$19.1M
Capital expenditure$1.81M$381,798$573,584$1.66M$9.14M
Total debt$1.12M$463,424$584,704$229,612$0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dakota Gold competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%FFMASMOGGKCNLGDPNRCYLCRMLFDRMKOGFMTUNFF000409NFGCDC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dakota Gold is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-600%-400%-200%0%00×100×200×FFMASMOGGKCNLGDCRMLFDROMGMKOTUNDCReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Dakota Gold is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-500%-250%0%250%-500%0%FFMASMLGDCRMLOMGTUNDCROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Dakota Gold is the large dot.

Dakota Gold competitors and peer comparison

How Dakota Gold compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dakota Gold against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.7%-9.9%5th highest of 21
6-month return-1.0%-18.1%5th highest of 19
Return on equity-23.4%7.8%5th lowest of 20
Price / book4.34×2.65×6th most expensive of 21
ROE the price implies38.7%29.7%7th most demanding of 21
ROE delivered-23.4%7.8%5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Dakota Gold DCUnited States$798M-1%n/a-23%4.34×38.7%-23.4%
FireFly Metals FFM.AXAustralia$798M-31%n/a-8%2.39×29.4%-8.3%
Avino Silver & Gold Mines ASM.TOCanada$799M-30%+54%21%2.79×46.7%20.8%
Osisko Gold OGG.VCanada$814M-18%+805%8%0.99×13.4%7.8%
Cadillac Mines CADY.TOCanada$815Mn/an/an/a9.88×157.7%n/a
Kingsgate Consolidated KCN.AXAustralia$779M-39%+77%63%2.01×21.9%63.3%
Liberty Gold LGD.TOCanada$819M+50%n/a34%9.20×110.5%34.4%
Pantoro Gold PNR.AXAustralia$826M-9%+35%20%1.95×23.0%20.2%
Catalyst Metals CYL.AXAustralia$746M-28%+75%29%1.52×15.2%29.2%
Critical Metals CRMLUnited States$864M-58%n/a-105%2.51×32.2%-104.7%
Founders Metals FDR.VCanada$734M+42%n/a-9%5.52×30.0%-9.2%
Omai Gold Mines OMG.VCanada$879M-23%n/a-74%25.80×403.4%-73.7%
Mako Mining MKO.VCanada$712M+7%+79%36%3.70×36.5%36.1%
Griffin Mining GFM.LUnited Kingdom$711M-4%+29%12%2.42×21.0%12.0%
Santacruz Silver Mining SCZ.TOCanada$707Mn/a+38%22%3.28×53.5%22.1%
Highlander Silver HSLV.TOCanada$906M-23%n/a1%2.22×21.6%1.2%
Tungsten West TUN.LUnited Kingdom$694M-18%n/a-608%8.26×86.4%-607.6%
First Mining Gold FF.TOCanada$670M+33%n/a-33%4.14×30.4%-32.5%
McEwen MUX.TOCanada$954M-31%+54%14%1.31×17.6%13.5%
Yunding Technology 000409.SZChina$960M-18%+6%5%3.35×21.0%4.6%
New Found Gold NFGC.TOCanada$662M-16%n/a-19%1.82×19.2%-19.4%

Questions

Which companies are Dakota Gold's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: FireFly Metals (FFM.AX), Avino Silver & Gold Mines (ASM.TO), Osisko Gold (OGG.V), Cadillac Mines (CADY.TO), Kingsgate Consolidated (KCN.AX), Liberty Gold (LGD.TO), Pantoro Gold (PNR.AX), Catalyst Metals (CYL.AX).
Is Dakota Gold expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 4.34× against a peer median of 2.65×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 38.7%; Dakota Gold delivers -23.4%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Dakota Gold stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.0% against -18.1% for the median peer; over one year +49.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.