Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CORZ Core Scientific, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Core Scientific, Inc.CORZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Operator of large data centers, pivoting from bitcoin mining to hosting AI/high-performance computing for CoreWeave.

Momentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$3.78B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$247M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 12.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BB / —
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
144 days
30 Mar 2027
Close · USD$11.76
1D+3.3%
1W-11.2%
1M-23.4%
3M-39.5%
6M-48.7%
YTD-19.2%
1Y-46.1%
ATR %10.6%
Beta2.85
52w lowhigh61.4% off high

What Core Scientific does

Operator of large data centers, pivoting from bitcoin mining to hosting AI/high-performance computing for CoreWeave.

Under its CoreWeave contracts it is paid fees for powered space, cooling and operating staff, while CoreWeave supplies the AI chips, so it takes little technology risk but depends on one client. It emerged from bankruptcy in early 2024 after the 2022 crypto downturn; mining is the older business.

Products and services

  • AI/HPC colocation hosting (CoreWeave contracts)
  • Bitcoin mining
  • Hosting for third-party miners

Customers

  • CoreWeave (large AI/HPC hosting contracts)
  • other mining/hosting customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Digital infrastructure
  • Data center hosting
  • Bitcoin mining (legacy) + AI/HPC…

What could go right

  • AI/HPC colocation demand
  • Long-term contracted revenue from CoreWeave

What could go wrong

  • Heavy debt taken on to fund the pivot
  • Dependence on a single large customer (CoreWeave)

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs). Existing powered sites and grid interconnection are slow to replicate, anchored by long-term CoreWeave contracts.

Headquarters: Austin, Texas, US · Founded: 2017 · Employees: 325

Named competitors

Core Scientific at a glance

Size Core Scientific (CORZ) is a United States Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $3.78B, the 1381st largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $11.76 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 48.7%, against +3.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 26.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.6%); the operating margin is -30.6% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 14.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.1× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Credit Core Scientific has 3 bonds outstanding ($4.38B), rated BB by the agencies.

Short interest Short interest is 23.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 106CORZ 51
Six months, rebased to 100: Core Scientific against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Core Scientific financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$440M$319M$511M$502M$640M
Revenue growth—-38%+2%-22%—
Gross profit$124M$36.8M$120M$75.2M$8.40M
EBITDA-$60.0M-$113M$109M$112M-$18.5M
Net income-$1.38B-$281M-$1.25B-$246M-$2.15B
Free cash flow-$958M-$451M-$52.1M$49.0M-$179M
Capital expenditure$1.72B$739M$95.2M$16.2M$384M
Total debt$4.41B$1.16B$1.20B$866M$37.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Core Scientific competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-20%0%+20%6885686034443635300496301396MNDYLIFAPPNMGNIDLOKXSFAAVPT0022610268AGYSOPLN600536CORZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Core Scientific is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%10×20×6885686034443635300496301396MNDYLIFAPPNMGNIDLOKXS6880FAAVPT002261AGYSOPLN600536SRADCORZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Core Scientific is the large dot.

Core Scientific competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CORZ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Core Scientific CORZ$3.78B-49%+26%-31%14.2×n/a
RIOT RIOT$6.27B-31%+6%-84%9.2×n/a
MARA MARA$2.45B-51%+1%-123%n/an/a
CleanSpark CLSK$1.58B-57%+7%-52%n/an/a
Applied Digital APLD$4.70B-62%+290%-24%11.8×n/a

How Core Scientific compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Core Scientific against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCORZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.4%+7.2%lowest of 21
6-month return-48.7%+3.8%2nd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-61.4%-36.0%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+26.4%+22.6%8th highest of 21
Operating margin-30.6%9.8%3rd lowest of 20
EV / Sales14.2×5.1×3rd most expensive of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Core Scientific CORZUnited States$3.78B-49%+26%-31%14.2×n/an/a
Geovis Technology 688568.SSChina$3.78B-45%-64%-70%21.9×n/an/a
G-Bits Network Technology (Xiamen) 603444.SSChina$3.77B-14%+35%40%2.9×-0.9%+17.7%
Koei Tecmo 3635.TJapan$3.74B+15%+19%43%4.9×-5.7%+7.9%
Thunder Software Technology 300496.SZChina$3.83B-13%+40%6%2.5×n/an/a
Glory View Technology 301396.SZChina$3.72B-49%+53%n/a12.7×n/an/a
monday.com MNDYUnited States$3.72B+22%+24%3%2.1×23.6%+50.2%
Life360 LIFUnited States$3.86B+8%+34%1%6.5×n/an/a
Appian APPNUnited States$3.70B+135%+21%4%4.8×42.9%+19.0%
Magnite MGNIUnited States$3.93B+94%+8%16%5.4×31.9%+26.4%
DLocal DLOUnited States$3.94B+2%+57%18%2.3×2.4%+60.0%
Kinaxis KXS.TOCanada$4.01B+35%+16%18%6.3×12.9%+20.6%
Momenta Global 6880.HKHong Kong$4.02Bn/a+82%-32%28.1×n/an/a
First Advantage FAUnited States$4.04B+47%+33%11%3.5×20.8%+25.3%
AvePoint AVPTUnited States$3.50B+45%+25%10%6.7×31.6%+22.6%
Talkweb Information System 002261.SZChina$4.11B-39%+9%1%7.5×n/an/a
Kingdee International Software 0268.HKHong Kong$4.16B+3%+17%2%3.5×45.4%+15.0%
Agilysys AGYSUnited States$3.42B+69%+15%13%9.6×22.9%+18.4%
OPENLANE OPLNUnited States$4.22B-9%+13%17%3.1×11.1%-2.4%
China National Software & Service 600536.SSChina$4.22B-20%-16%0%6.2×49.7%-7.3%
Sportradar SRADUnited States$4.22B+4%+25%13%2.4×11.3%+25.8%

Core Scientific bonds and credit

Core Scientific has 3 bonds outstanding with $4.38B face value. The agencies rate it BB.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Core Scientific's main competitors?
Named competitors: Riot Platforms (RIOT), MARA Holdings (MARA), CleanSpark (CLSK), Applied Digital (APLD). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Geovis Technology (688568.SS), G-Bits Network Technology (Xiamen) (603444.SS), Koei Tecmo (3635.T), Thunder Software Technology (300496.SZ), Glory View Technology (301396.SZ), monday.com (MNDY).
Is Core Scientific expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 14.2× against a peer median of 5.1×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Core Scientific stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -48.7% against +3.8% for the median peer; over one year -46.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.