Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BIG.L Big Technologies PLCOpen in the cockpit ↗

Big Technologies PLCBIG.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Information Technology›Computer Communications
Momentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$353M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$492,495
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-53.6 pp
WACC 11.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
145 days
31 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£90.00
1D-2.2%
1W0.0%
1M-4.5%
3M-6.4%
6M-13.9%
YTD+19.1%
1Y+32.4%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh21.4% off high

What Big Technologies does

No business profile yet.

Big Technologies at a glance

Size Big Technologies (BIG.L) is a United Kingdom Information Technology company (Computer Communications) with a market value of $353M, the 340th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £90.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.9%, against -12.0% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.9%); the operating margin is -36.5% (peer median 2.4%).

Valuation It trades at 14.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.3× (5th cheapest of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 53.6 points below its cost of capital (11.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 31 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87BIG.L 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Big Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Big Technologies financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£51.9M£49.7M£50.3M£55.2M£50.2M
Revenue growth—-1%-9%+10%—
Gross profit£32.5M£31.1M£32.4M£37.7M£35.1M
EBITDA-£12.7M-£2.94M£19.3M£22.0M£23.3M
Net income£13.3M-£23.2M£2.44M£16.2M£20.0M
Free cash flow-£24.3M£6.25M£20.0M£30.0M£24.1M
Capital expenditure£1.36M£1.52M£1.14M£1.56M£1.27M
Total debtn/a£2.10M£1.78M£1.85M£707,000

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Big Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%+20%300884301337002771688171300659050890300155300698688060SMRTKERNEX3704ALLT6880042392421230296741603386BIG.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Big Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×3008843006590508903006983704ALLT30296741603386BIG.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Big Technologies is the large dot.

Big Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Big Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Big Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBIG.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.5%-13.0%7th highest of 21
6-month return-13.9%-12.0%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.4%-34.3%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.7%+5.9%10th highest of 21
Operating margin-36.5%2.4%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E14.0×14.3×5th cheapest of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-53.6 pp-6.7 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Big Technologies BIG.LUnited Kingdom$353M-14%+7%-36%14.0×n/an/a
Dnake (Xiamen) Intelligent Technology 300884.SZChina$351M-27%+6%-8%47.0×n/an/a
Yarward Electronics 301337.SZChina$360M-16%+20%-10%n/an/an/a
Beijing Transtrue Technology 002771.SZChina$334M-28%-43%-18%n/a-0.5%-11.0%
Guangdong Weide Information Technology 688171.SSChina$334M-48%+39%2%n/an/an/a
Zhongfu Information 300659.SZChina$384M-24%-28%-27%7.2×35.0%-6.1%
SOLiD 050890.KSSouth Korea$321M-57%+10%10%11.6×2.0%+11.5%
Guangdong Anjubao Digital Technology 300155.SZChina$320M-24%-26%-42%n/an/an/a
Wanma Technology 300698.SZChina$397M-48%+6%3%30.8×32.9%+8.5%
Jiangsu Yunyong Electronics and Technology 688060.SSChina$312M-27%+7%-10%n/an/an/a
SmartRent SMRTUnited States$305M+42%+4%-12%n/a37.3%+23.7%
Kernex Microsystems India KERNEX.NSIndia$303M+12%+304%33%n/an/an/a
Zyxel 3704.TWTaiwan$414M-4%+5%5%9.1×-5.7%+2.6%
Allot ALLTUnited States$422M+10%+14%7%24.2×23.1%-5.6%
Beijing Bohui Science & Technology 688004.SSChina$455M+63%-33%-42%n/a39.5%-9.9%
Wuhan Ligong Guangke 300557.SZChina$461M-28%+3%5%n/a31.7%+11.1%
Cheng Uei Precision Industry 2392.TWTaiwan$499M-8%-10%-12%n/an/an/a
Sekisui Jushi 4212.TJapan$516M+28%+5%7%n/a1.8%+3.8%
Zero One Technology 3029.TWTaiwan$566M+10%+76%6%14.3×-9.2%+20.4%
Nippon Signal 6741.TJapan$645M-3%+10%11%8.8×-7.9%+4.2%
Guangdong Champion Asia Electronics 603386.SSChina$670M+3%+15%3%36.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Big Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Dnake (Xiamen) Intelligent Technology (300884.SZ), Yarward Electronics (301337.SZ), Beijing Transtrue Technology (002771.SZ), Guangdong Weide Information Technology (688171.SS), Zhongfu Information (300659.SZ), SOLiD (050890.KS), Guangdong Anjubao Digital Technology (300155.SZ), Wanma Technology (300698.SZ).
Is Big Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.0× against a peer median of 14.3×, 5th cheapest of 10 in its peer set.
How has Big Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.9% against -12.0% for the median peer; over one year +32.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.