Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BAND Bandwidth Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Bandwidth Inc. Class ABANDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Provides cloud communications APIs (voice, messaging, 911 services) that businesses use to embed calling/texting into apps.

Momentum laggard 19
Mkt cap
$1.31B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$44.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-16.9 pp
WACC 15.7%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$40.34
1D+6.7%
1W-14.8%
1M-22.4%
3M-23.5%
6M-19.1%
YTD+161.1%
1Y+174.2%
ATR %11.4%
Beta2.48
52w lowhigh49.0% off high

What Bandwidth does

Provides cloud communications APIs (voice, messaging, 911 services) that businesses use to embed calling/texting into apps.

Charges on usage, per voice minute and per message, plus fees for phone numbers and 911 access, so revenue rises with its customers' traffic. A small number of large software platforms, among them Microsoft and Zoom, supply a big share of volume. The 2020 purchase of Voxbone took it into Europe.

Products and services

  • Voice/messaging APIs
  • Emergency (911) calling services
  • Owned telecom network infrastructure

Customers

  • Enterprises/software companies embedding communica

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Communications platform (CPaaS)
  • Cloud communications APIs & network…

What could go right

  • Growing embedded communications (CPaaS) adoption
  • Enterprise UCaaS/contact center demand

What could go wrong

  • Competitive CPaaS pricing pressure
  • Customer concentration risk

Moat: narrow (installed base, regulatory licence, scale). Owning underlying telecom network infrastructure and 911 compliance capability differentiate it from pure API resellers.

Headquarters: Raleigh, North Carolina, United States · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 1,100

Named competitors

Bandwidth at a glance

Size Bandwidth (BAND) is a United States Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $1.31B, the 2079th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $40.34 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.1%, against +9.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.7%); the operating margin is -1.3% (peer median 5.7%).

Valuation It trades at 19.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.8× (6th most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.9 points below its cost of capital (15.7% WACC).

Credit Bandwidth has 1 bond outstanding ($316M).

Short interest Short interest is 16.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108BAND 81
Six months, rebased to 100: Bandwidth against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Bandwidth financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$870M$754M$748M$601M$573M
Revenue growth—+1%+25%+5%—
Gross profit$293M$270M$257M$219M$224M
EBITDA$58.9M$42.8M$32.8M$15.6M$18.3M
Net income$8.75M-$12.9M-$6.52M-$16.3M$19.6M
Free cash flow$87.2M$56.5M$58.0M$18.4M-$29.7M
Capital expenditure$26.6M$32.9M$25.4M$19.9M$64.1M
Total debt$533M$480M$504M$645M$493M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bandwidth competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+100%+200%-25%0%+25%OPRA300634CHG0006769759AMAGI0800CRSR301382VYX300768APPSIBTAZENSARTECH2492BAND6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bandwidth is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×100×200×300×OPRA300634CHG9759AMAGI462870CRSRVYX300768APPS2492BANDRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bandwidth is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%100%OPRA300634CHG0006769759462870CRSR300768BANDGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bandwidth is the large dot.

Bandwidth competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BAND vs TWLO vs ERIC vs RNG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Bandwidth BAND$1.31B-19%+15%-1%19.6×19.3%
Twilio TWLO$31.3B0%+19%8%30.7×38.2%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson Sponsored ADR ERIC$36.7B-14%+4%14%15.5×-1.6%
RingCentral RNG$6.09B+58%+5%9%13.3×15.2%

How Bandwidth compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bandwidth against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBANDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.4%-3.5%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-19.1%+9.3%5th lowest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-49.0%-29.6%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.1%+10.7%10th highest of 21
Operating margin-1.3%5.7%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E19.6×16.8×6th most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.3%14.3%6th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+17.0%+14.5%6th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.3 pp-0.5 pp6th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-16.9 pp-5.1 pp6th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA28.2×10.8×3rd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA6.1×-2.0×2nd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bandwidth BANDUnited States$1.31B-19%+15%-1%19.6×19.3%+17.0%
Opera Limited Sponsored ADR OPRAUnited States$1.31B-21%+23%16%11.9×4.5%+30.1%
Richinfo Technology 300634.SZChina$1.30B-15%-11%10%31.2×20.8%+19.9%
CHAPTERS CHG.DEGermany$1.30B+48%+63%-21%294.5×43.9%+178.6%
Genimous Technology 000676.SZChina$1.30B-7%+3%6%n/a14.1%-17.5%
NSD 9759.TJapan$1.32B+12%+10%16%16.6×-10.9%+12.2%
Amagi Media Labs AMAGI.NSIndia$1.32B+30%+30%3%60.2×n/an/a
Transwarp Technology (Shanghai) 6727.HKHong Kong$1.33Bn/a+32%-50%n/an/an/a
SHIFT UP 462870.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-4%-12%56%13.3×-12.9%+59.7%
Shenzhen HQVT Technology 1392.HKHong Kong$1.28Bn/a+28%5%n/an/an/a
WeRide 0800.HKHong Kong$1.33B-47%+109%-221%n/an/an/a
Corsair Gaming CRSRUnited States$1.28B+63%+3%3%16.1×24.3%-2.9%
Mech-Mind Robotics Technologies 9615.HKHong Kong$1.34Bn/a+45%-41%n/an/an/a
Fengzhushou 301382.SZChina$1.28B-32%+28%8%n/an/an/a
NCR Voyix VYXUnited States$1.35B+17%-5%7%9.9×n/an/a
Hangzhou DPTech Technology 300768.SZChina$1.35B-19%-3%5%42.3×34.9%+6.5%
Digital Turbine APPSUnited States$1.26B+200%+19%10%14.7×33.1%+12.5%
Ibotta IBTAUnited States$1.37B+19%+2%-3%n/a-1.1%+17.6%
Datang Telecom Technology 600198.SSChina$1.25B-24%-11%-30%n/an/an/a
Zensar Technologies ZENSARTECH.NSIndia$1.37B+9%+9%14%16.9×13.4%+8.5%
Infomart 2492.TJapan$1.24B+70%+11%19%65.9×14.5%+16.5%

Bandwidth bonds and credit

Bandwidth has 1 bond outstanding with $316M face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Bandwidth's main competitors?
Named competitors: Twilio (TWLO), Vonage (Ericsson) (ERIC), RingCentral (RNG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Opera Limited Sponsored ADR (OPRA), Richinfo Technology (300634.SZ), CHAPTERS (CHG.DE), Genimous Technology (000676.SZ), NSD (9759.T), Amagi Media Labs (AMAGI.NS).
Is Bandwidth expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.6× against a peer median of 16.8×, 6th most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Bandwidth stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.1% against +9.3% for the median peer; over one year +174.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.