Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9877.HK Jenscare Scientific Co. Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Jenscare Scientific Co. Ltd. Class H9877.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Health Care›Medical Specialties
Momentum weak 34
Mkt cap
$463M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
44%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$81,914
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-43.1 pp
WACC 7.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
145 days
31 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$6.45
1D0.0%
1W-1.8%
1M-13.9%
3M-7.5%
6M-32.2%
YTD-27.5%
1Y-38.0%
ATR %7.6%
52w lowhigh46.2% off high

What Jenscare Scientific does

Employees: 195

Jenscare Scientific at a glance

Size Jenscare Scientific (9877.HK) is a Hong Kong Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $463M, the 778th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$6.45 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.2%, against -13.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 992.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.5%); the operating margin is -106.3% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 20.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.4× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 43.1 points below its cost of capital (7.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 31 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 879877.HK 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Jenscare Scientific against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Jenscare Scientific financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$158MHK$98.2MHK$0HK$0HK$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profitHK$121MHK$74.6M-HK$13.9M-HK$13.3M-HK$10.7M
EBITDA-HK$147M-HK$242M-HK$222M-HK$471M-HK$584M
Net income-HK$167M-HK$294M-HK$192M-HK$411M-HK$511M
Free cash flow-HK$84.6M-HK$86.2M-HK$313M-HK$332M-HK$247M
Capital expenditureHK$17.6MHK$5.50MHK$77.7MHK$86.9MHK$57.6M
Total debtn/aHK$52.8MHK$68.6MHK$48.5MHK$4.35M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Jenscare Scientific competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%30150268802645493001103005150020166039877979468530BWAY1763300289MDXG688358CEVI300238MASSANGO9877.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Jenscare Scientific is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+250%+500%+750%+1,000%0×200×400×3015026880264685309877.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Jenscare Scientific is the large dot.

Jenscare Scientific competitors and peer comparison

How Jenscare Scientific compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Jenscare Scientific against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9877.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.9%-6.0%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.2%-13.4%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-46.2%-36.7%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+992.7%+0.5%highest of 21
Operating margin-106.3%8.6%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales20.2×4.4×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-43.1 pp-2.4 pp2nd lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Jenscare Scientific 9877.HKHong Kong$463M-32%+993%-106%20.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu Huayang Intelligent Equipment 301502.SZChina$470M+35%-5%2%7.1×42.6%+0.4%
Guangzhou Jet Bio-Filtration 688026.SSChina$471M+40%+5%11%5.2×22.1%+2.2%
Eiken Chemical 4549.TJapan$454M-29%+4%6%1.5×n/an/a
Huaren Pharmaceutical 300110.SZChina$472M-16%-3%6%3.5×6.7%+0.3%
Hunan Sundy Science and Technology 300515.SZChina$453M-13%+10%27%3.7×0.9%+15.6%
Guangdong Shirongzhaoye 002016.SZChina$473M-28%-31%3%4.0×22.2%-11.7%
Shanghai Kindly Enterprises Development 603987.SSChina$474M-14%0%11%1.6×3.8%-2.8%
Shofu 7979.TJapan$475M+27%+7%14%1.6×n/an/a
PROTEINA 468530.KSSouth Korea$450M-2%-59%-1,178%410.3×n/an/a
Brainsway Ltd Sponsored ADR BWAYUnited States$450M-35%+32%12%6.5×34.3%+18.8%
China Isotope & Radiation 1763.HKHong Kong$478M-38%-5%13%n/an/an/a
Beijing Leadman Biochemistry 300289.SZChina$483M-11%-6%-12%7.5×35.5%-6.9%
MiMedx MDXGUnited States$483M-8%-23%-8%1.2×11.5%+11.0%
Chison Medical Technologies 688358.SSChina$443M-16%-1%19%4.4×11.8%+5.6%
CellaVision CEVI.STSweden$485M+68%+2%23%6.0×6.5%+10.0%
WELL LEAD MEDICAL 603309.SSChina$486M-19%+1%15%2.0×-5.6%+7.7%
Guanhao Biotech 300238.SZChina$440M-25%-7%5%7.8×n/an/a
908 Devices MASSUnited States$436M+29%+1%-35%5.5×n/an/a
AngioDynamics ANGOUnited States$493M+5%+8%-6%1.4×n/an/a
Revenio REG1V.HEFinland$494M-22%+16%14%5.5×19.3%+12.4%

Questions

Which companies are Jenscare Scientific's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Jiangsu Huayang Intelligent Equipment (301502.SZ), Guangzhou Jet Bio-Filtration (688026.SS), Eiken Chemical (4549.T), Huaren Pharmaceutical (300110.SZ), Hunan Sundy Science and Technology (300515.SZ), Guangdong Shirongzhaoye (002016.SZ), Shanghai Kindly Enterprises Development (603987.SS), Shofu (7979.T).
Is Jenscare Scientific expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 20.2× against a peer median of 4.4×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Jenscare Scientific stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.2% against -13.4% for the median peer; over one year -38.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.