Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9696.HK Tianqi Lithium Corp. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tianqi Lithium Corp. Class H9696.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Major Chinese lithium producer with stakes in Australia's Greenbushes mine and Chile's SQM, supplying lithium for EV batteries.

≈ A Chinese Albemarle competitorMomentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$8.79B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.0 pp
WACC 7.6%
Hurdle
-36 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$24.12
1D-4.2%
1W+4.5%
1M-11.8%
3M-32.6%
6M-64.0%
YTD-52.8%
1Y-49.1%
ATR %4.6%
52w lowhigh65.1% off high

What Tianqi Lithium does

Major Chinese lithium producer with stakes in Australia's Greenbushes mine and Chile's SQM, supplying lithium for EV batteries.

Earnings depend heavily on holdings it does not control outright: a joint-venture stake in the Greenbushes mine in Australia and a minority share of Chile's SQM, which bring investment income alongside lithium chemicals sold from its own Chinese plants. Lithium prices swing results. Debt taken on to buy the SQM stake in 2018 has shaped its finances since.

In one line: A Chinese Albemarle competitor.

Products and services

  • Lithium concentrate/chemicals
  • Greenbushes mine stake (Australia)
  • SQM equity stake (Chile)

Customers

  • EV/battery cell makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Lithium & battery materials
  • Lithium mining & chemical processing

What could go right

  • Global EV battery demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Lithium price cyclicality/oversupply
  • High debt from overseas acquisitions

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Ownership stakes in tier-1 global lithium resources (Greenbushes, SQM) secure low-cost supply.

Headquarters: Chengdu, China · Founded: 1995 · Employees: 3,902

Named competitors

Tianqi Lithium at a glance

Size Tianqi Lithium (9696.HK) is a Hong Kong Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $8.79B, the 177th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$24.12 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 64.0%, against -14.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 115.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is 57.4% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 5.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.2× (cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.0 points above its cost of capital (7.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 859696.HK 39
Six months, rebased to 100: Tianqi Lithium against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tianqi Lithium financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$24.2BHK$11.2BHK$14.2BHK$44.7BHK$46.8B
Revenue growth—-21%-68%-4%—
Gross profitHK$16.0BHK$4.35BHK$6.45BHK$38.0BHK$39.7B
EBITDAn/aHK$4.90BHK$6.13BHK$37.4BHK$39.9B
Net incomeHK$6.73BHK$502M-HK$8.57BHK$8.06BHK$28.1B
Free cash flowHK$5.78B-HK$650MHK$1.51BHK$22.8BHK$25.4B
Capital expenditureHK$2.96BHK$3.91BHK$4.91BHK$4.91BHK$2.00B
Total debtHK$18.3BHK$17.2BHK$16.2BHK$13.2BHK$10.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tianqi Lithium competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%002709600426WLK002460EMN6885851326CRDAALB1301SOLNEU600378002648LINDEINDIA30003740040519106012169696.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tianqi Lithium is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×002709600426WLK002460EMN1326ALB1301SOL600378002648LINDEINDIA3000379696.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tianqi Lithium is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%002709600426WLK002460EMN1326CRDAALBSOLNEU600378002648LINDEINDIA3000376012169696.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tianqi Lithium is the large dot.

Tianqi Lithium competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9696.HK vs 1772.HK vs ALB vs SQM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tianqi Lithium 9696.HK$8.79B-64%+116%57%5.0×-10.8%
Ganfeng Lithium 1772.HK$9.76B-72%+123%18%6.4×9.0%
Albemarle ALB$11.7B-51%+18%14%11.3×10.9%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. Sponsored ADR Pfd Series B SQM$16.0B-37%+59%39%7.3×-4.8%

How Tianqi Lithium compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tianqi Lithium against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9696.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.8%-5.6%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-64.0%-14.4%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-65.1%-35.7%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+115.7%+3.2%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin57.4%13.3%highest of 21
Forward P/E5.0×18.2×cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.8%10.9%2nd least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+25.3%+11.4%5th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-36.1 pp-3.3 pp2nd least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.0 pp-0.8 pp4th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tianqi Lithium 9696.HKHong Kong$8.79B-64%+116%57%5.0×-10.8%+25.3%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology 002709.SZChina$8.73B-53%+102%19%10.3×9.3%+32.3%
Shandong Hualu-Hengsheng Chemical 600426.SSChina$8.27B-32%+3%16%12.3×-2.5%+18.7%
Westlake WLKUnited States$8.11B-32%0%1%38.6×37.4%+8.3%
Ganfeng Lithium 002460.SZChina$9.71B-57%+128%18%11.5×4.4%+33.1%
Eastman Chemical EMNUnited States$7.37B-13%0%10%10.2×5.1%+0.7%
Swancor Advanced Materials 688585.SSChina$10.9B+50%+3%-25%n/an/an/a
Formosa Chemicals & Fibre 1326.TWTaiwan$11.1B+21%-5%1%21.0×26.2%+2.5%
Croda International CRDA.LUnited Kingdom$6.88B+31%+3%16%23.3×19.9%+4.1%
Albemarle ALBUnited States$11.7B-51%+18%14%11.3×10.9%+10.4%
Formosa Plastics 1301.TWTaiwan$12.1B+22%-11%-2%21.4×n/an/a
SOL SOL.MIItaly$6.39B+6%+9%14%30.5×16.9%+12.8%
NewMarket NEUUnited States$6.39B+1%+1%20%n/a-0.8%+6.3%
Haohua Chemical Science & Technology 600378.SSChina$6.29B-9%+20%9%22.1×11.0%+25.2%
Satellite Chemical 002648.SZChina$12.4B-17%+20%23%7.2×-13.2%+33.8%
Linde India LINDEINDIA.NSIndia$6.20B-13%+13%22%97.2×47.9%+11.5%
Shenzhen Capchem Technology 300037.SZChina$6.16B-21%+72%13%19.0×19.3%+26.6%
Resonac 4004.TJapan$12.6B-26%+1%8%18.0×26.7%+6.7%
Lgchem 051910.KSSouth Korea$12.6B-42%0%0%n/an/an/a
Inner Mongolia Junzheng Energy & Chemical 601216.SSChina$5.92B-16%+3%11%12.0×-3.4%+11.3%
Zhejiang Juhua 600160.SSChina$13.1B-12%-5%20%18.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Tianqi Lithium's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ganfeng Lithium (1772.HK), Albemarle (ALB), SQM (SQM). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology (002709.SZ), Shandong Hualu-Hengsheng Chemical (600426.SS), Westlake (WLK), Ganfeng Lithium (002460.SZ), Eastman Chemical (EMN), Swancor Advanced Materials (688585.SS).
Is Tianqi Lithium expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.0× against a peer median of 18.2×, cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tianqi Lithium stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -64.0% against -14.4% for the median peer; over one year -49.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.