Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7014.T Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.7014.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery

Japanese shipbuilder constructing bulk carriers and tankers for domestic and international shipping companies.

≈ A mid-size commercial shipyard, competing globally against Korean/Chinese yardsMomentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$1.62B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+41.0 pp
WACC 14.8%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,680
1D-2.6%
1W-11.6%
1M-20.5%
3M-10.8%
6M-9.1%
YTD+4.0%
1Y-4.2%
ATR %6.1%
52w lowhigh39.2% off high

What Namura Shipbuilding does

Japanese shipbuilder constructing bulk carriers and tankers for domestic and international shipping companies.

Earns on contracts to build each vessel at an agreed price, with payment staged through the build, so the order backlog sets output several years ahead. Ship repair is a smaller line.

In one line: A mid-size commercial shipyard, competing globally against Korean/Chinese yards.

Products and services

  • Bulk carriers
  • Tankers
  • Ship repair

Customers

  • Domestic and international shipping companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Shipbuilding
  • Bulk carriers & tankers

What could go right

  • Global fleet renewal/decarbonization newbuild demand

What could go wrong

  • Intense price competition from Korea/China
  • Shipping-cycle order volatility

Moat: none (process know-how). Shipbuilding is capital-intensive and highly competitive against lower-cost Korean and Chinese yards.

Headquarters: Imari, Saga, Japan · Founded: 1911 · Employees: 2,436

Named competitors

  • Imabari Shipbuilding private or unlisted
  • Hyundai Mipo Dockyard private or unlisted

Namura Shipbuilding at a glance

Size Namura Shipbuilding (7014.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) with a market value of $1.62B, the 547th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,680 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.1%, against -13.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.1%); the operating margin is 19.3% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 9.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.4× (4th cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 41.0 points above its cost of capital (14.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267014.T 91Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Namura Shipbuilding against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Namura Shipbuilding financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥166B¥159B¥159B¥135B¥124B
Revenue growth—0%+18%+9%—
Gross profit¥40.5B¥36.2B¥36.3B¥22.9B¥15.0B
EBITDA¥36.0B¥31.9B¥32.9B¥20.1B¥13.2B
Net income¥24.4B¥21.6B¥26.2B¥20.0B¥11.2B
Free cash flown/a¥32.1B¥32.4B¥25.6B¥7.10B
Capital expendituren/a¥6.90B¥5.54B¥1.93B¥2.08B
Total debt¥20.6B¥21.3B¥18.2B¥13.3B¥11.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Namura Shipbuilding competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%ALG3339WACSWANDEF605099605389603950BEMLDEZ300008082740ACE000880COM301225310568848500387003INGERRAND7014.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Namura Shipbuilding is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×ALG3339WAC605099603950BEMLDEZ300008ACECOM3012253105INGERRAND7014.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Namura Shipbuilding is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%ALGWACSWANDEF605099605389603950300008ACE70037014.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Namura Shipbuilding is the large dot.

Namura Shipbuilding competitors and peer comparison

How Namura Shipbuilding compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Namura Shipbuilding against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7014.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.5%-7.0%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-9.1%-13.7%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-39.2%-36.5%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.5%+11.1%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin19.3%7.6%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E9.9×13.4×4th cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-3.1%10.8%least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.1%+10.1%9th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.2 pp-2.3 pp4th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+41.0 pp-0.4 pphighest of 21
EV / EBITDA4.4×9.5×2nd cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-2.8×0.7×2nd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Namura Shipbuilding 7014.TJapan$1.62B-9%+7%19%9.9×-3.1%+10.1%
Alamo ALGUnited States$1.63B-18%+2%7%11.6×7.0%+6.6%
Lonking 3339.HKHong Kong$1.57B-14%+22%12%7.0×n/an/a
Wacker Neuson WAC.DEGermany$1.71B+20%+14%7%13.4×1.5%+6.6%
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries SWANDEF.NSIndia$1.54B+48%+642%-109%n/a57.1%+113.9%
CoCreation Grass 605099.SSChina$1.72B-41%+10%21%15.4×2.2%+12.3%
JiangSu Changling Hydraulic 605389.SSChina$1.72B-32%+19%12%n/a36.1%+4.4%
Xiangyang Changyuandonggu Industry 603950.SSChina$1.72B-36%-8%17%22.8×22.1%+6.1%
BEML BEML.NSIndia$1.72B-2%+13%6%39.1×n/an/a
Deutz DEZ.DEGermany$1.74B-13%+11%5%11.4×19.8%+9.5%
Bestway Marine & Energy Technology 300008.SZChina$1.51B-29%+1%8%30.6×14.5%+54.0%
Hanwha Engine 082740.KSSouth Korea$1.50B-72%+3%12%10.9×-0.3%+10.6%
Action Construction Equipment ACE.NSIndia$1.47B+29%+5%15%29.0×29.6%+21.7%
Weichai Heavy Machinery 000880.SZChina$1.44B-33%+58%2%n/a6.8%+13.1%
Comer Industries COM.MIItaly$1.43B-18%+31%10%13.5×3.1%+17.7%
Hengbo 301225.SZChina$1.41B-11%+69%7%85.7×n/an/a
Nisshinbo 3105.TJapan$1.87B-9%+2%7%11.5×3.6%+1.9%
Beijing Jiuzhouyigui Environmental Technology 688485.SSChina$1.91B+29%+9%2%n/an/an/a
First Tractor 0038.HKHong Kong$1.93B-12%+18%6%8.5×-1.8%+6.7%
Mitsui ES 7003.TJapan$1.98B-45%+12%11%8.7×16.0%-11.3%
Ingersoll-Rand (India) INGERRAND.NSIndia$1.33B-13%+8%23%41.2×34.1%+17.6%

Questions

Who are Namura Shipbuilding's main competitors?
Named competitors: Imabari Shipbuilding (private or unlisted), Hyundai Mipo Dockyard (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Alamo (ALG), Lonking (3339.HK), Wacker Neuson (WAC.DE), Swan Defence and Heavy Industries (SWANDEF.NS), CoCreation Grass (605099.SS), JiangSu Changling Hydraulic (605389.SS).
Is Namura Shipbuilding expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.9× against a peer median of 13.4×, 4th cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Namura Shipbuilding stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.1% against -13.7% for the median peer; over one year -4.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.