Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688339.SS Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. Class A688339.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Momentum laggard 17
Mkt cap
$521M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-38.4 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥16.18
1D-1.9%
1W+4.4%
1M-20.5%
3M-6.7%
6M-38.1%
YTD-40.0%
1Y-41.6%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh55.2% off high

What Beijing SinoHytec does

Employees: 482

Beijing SinoHytec at a glance

Size Beijing SinoHytec (688339.SS) is a China Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $521M, the 3770th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥16.18 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 38.1%, against -31.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 75.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.9%); the operating margin is -205.2% (peer median 7.1%).

Valuation It trades at 10.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 38.4 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 67688339.SS 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing SinoHytec against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing SinoHytec financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥269MCN¥258MCN¥367MCN¥797MCN¥737M
Revenue growth—-30%-54%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥151M-CN¥31.2M-CN¥36.4MCN¥180MCN¥215M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥395M-CN¥459M-CN¥219M-CN¥135M
Net income-CN¥546M-CN¥671M-CN¥456M-CN¥243M-CN¥167M
Free cash flow-CN¥51.1M-CN¥33.6M-CN¥50.5M-CN¥628M-CN¥488M
Capital expenditureCN¥18.6MCN¥50.1MCN¥34.5MCN¥74.5MCN¥164M
Total debtCN¥400MCN¥509MCN¥842MCN¥697MCN¥398M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing SinoHytec competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%00256430069030075627290013323004906039336031066254IQE603912NMAN002871GMMPFAUDLRPRV603150HY30022864596458688339.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing SinoHytec is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×5×10×00256430069030075627290013323004906039336031066254603912NMAN002871GMMPFAUDLRPRV603150HY64596458688339.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing SinoHytec is the large dot.

Beijing SinoHytec competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing SinoHytec compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing SinoHytec against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688339.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.5%-19.6%11th highest of 21
6-month return-38.1%-31.2%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-55.2%-49.7%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+75.4%+0.9%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin-205.2%7.1%lowest of 21
EV / Sales10.2×1.9×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-38.4 pp-3.2 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing SinoHytec 688339.SSChina$521M-38%+75%-205%10.2×n/an/a
Suzhou Thvow Technology 002564.SZChina$521M-33%-9%4%3.0×27.5%-19.9%
Shandong Shuangyi Technology 300690.SZChina$521M-26%+15%15%2.5×10.9%-6.3%
Guangdong Jinma Entertainment 300756.SZChina$521M-59%-8%0%5.0×n/an/a
Zhejiang Galaxis Technology 2729.HKHong Kong$518M-74%+26%-4%3.6×n/an/a
Wuxi Chemical Equipment 001332.SZChina$517M-50%-10%11%1.9×10.2%+7.3%
HNAC Technology 300490.SZChina$525M-57%+79%0%1.2×n/an/a
Fujian Raynen Technology 603933.SSChina$526M-31%+29%3%1.6×n/an/a
Cashway Fintech 603106.SSChina$526M-24%-36%8%10.1×n/an/a
Nomura Micro Science 6254.TJapan$527M-43%-48%11%2.5×22.4%+13.1%
IQE IQE.LUnited Kingdom$514M-39%+20%-11%3.4×n/an/a
Nanjing Canatal Data-Centre Environmental Tech 603912.SSChina$529M-38%-18%-19%4.7×n/an/a
Nederman NMAN.STSweden$512M+22%-6%8%1.3×4.4%+9.5%
Qingdao Weflo Valve 002871.SZChina$530M-24%+17%18%4.3×22.0%+14.3%
GMM Pfaudler GMMPFAUDLR.NSIndia$532M+22%+14%7%1.4×13.9%+28.6%
Porvair PRV.LUnited Kingdom$532M+15%+3%13%2.0×6.8%+7.5%
Higa 603150.SSChina$532M-32%+76%3%0.9×15.7%+27.7%
Hyster-Yale HYUnited States$509M-24%-11%-1%0.3×32.0%+6.0%
Zhangjiagang Furui Special Equipment 300228.SZChina$533M-36%-12%8%1.1×-3.9%+11.8%
Daiwa 6459.TJapan$507M-19%0%15%0.4×n/an/a
Sinko Industries 6458.TJapan$507M-8%+2%15%1.3×-1.4%+8.7%

Questions

Which companies are Beijing SinoHytec's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Suzhou Thvow Technology (002564.SZ), Shandong Shuangyi Technology (300690.SZ), Guangdong Jinma Entertainment (300756.SZ), Zhejiang Galaxis Technology (2729.HK), Wuxi Chemical Equipment (001332.SZ), HNAC Technology (300490.SZ), Fujian Raynen Technology (603933.SS), Cashway Fintech (603106.SS).
Is Beijing SinoHytec expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 10.2× against a peer median of 1.9×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Beijing SinoHytec stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -38.1% against -31.2% for the median peer; over one year -41.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.