Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6829.TWO Chenfull Precision Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Chenfull Precision Co., Ltd.6829.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense
Momentum weak 29
Mkt cap
$293M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$2.23M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.5 pp
WACC 8.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$164.00
1D-3.0%
1W-13.7%
1M-20.4%
3M-9.6%
6M-39.9%
YTD+51.1%
1Y+39.6%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh43.0% off high

What Chenfull Precision does

Employees: 528

Chenfull Precision at a glance

Size Chenfull Precision (6829.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $293M, the 661st largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$164.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.9%, against -22.6% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 34.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.9%); the operating margin is 15.9% (peer median 1.7%).

Valuation It trades at 25.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.5× (3rd most expensive of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.5 points above its cost of capital (8.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 776829.TWO 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Chenfull Precision against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Chenfull Precision financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$2.17BNT$1.82BNT$1.52BNT$1.35BNT$1.78B
Revenue growth—+20%+13%-24%—
Gross profitNT$548MNT$486MNT$525MNT$402MNT$562M
EBITDANT$459MNT$412MNT$457MNT$376MNT$443M
Net incomeNT$316MNT$234MNT$335MNT$208MNT$355M
Free cash flow-NT$336M-NT$114M-NT$273MNT$55.7MNT$414M
Capital expenditureNT$727MNT$438MNT$591MNT$112MNT$192M
Total debtNT$952MNT$682MNT$285MNT$127MNT$142M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chenfull Precision competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%0029779348144960300965688511688244MSIIDEAFORGE002933SPCE603261TATT77216946FGASATL6829.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Chenfull Precision is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%50×100×688244IAIDEAFORGE68807077216946PKE6829.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Chenfull Precision is the large dot.

Chenfull Precision competitors and peer comparison

How Chenfull Precision compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chenfull Precision against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6829.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.4%-10.3%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-39.9%-22.6%2nd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-43.0%-46.6%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+34.2%+4.9%5th highest of 21
Operating margin15.9%1.7%4th highest of 20
Forward P/E25.8×20.5×3rd most expensive of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.5 pp-5.1 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA22.7×13.2×most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×1.5×4th most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Chenfull Precision 6829.TWOTaiwan$293M-40%+34%16%25.8×n/an/a
Chengdu Tianjian Technology 002977.SZChina$306M-37%-357%n/an/an/an/a
ispace,inc 9348.TJapan$311M-28%-56%-681%n/an/an/a
New Power Plasma 144960.KSSouth Korea$326M+62%+22%8%n/a3.6%+39.7%
Beijing Hengyu Datacom Aviation Equipment 300965.SZChina$338M-33%-11%-8%n/a26.4%-1.2%
Sichuan Tianwei Electronic 688511.SSChina$342M-20%-56%-49%n/a10.9%-8.8%
Integrity Technology 688244.SSChina$344M-23%-28%-30%25.1×n/an/a
Innovative Solutions and Support IAUnited States$348Mn/a+20%27%18.8×2.6%+31.3%
MS International MSI.LUnited Kingdom$350M-8%-2%13%n/a-7.8%+13.3%
Ideaforge Technology IDEAFORGE.NSIndia$353M-15%+221%-8%101.5×n/an/a
Chengdu Jouav Automation Tech 688070.SSChina$399M-34%+5%2%17.6×n/an/a
Beijing Andawell Science & Technology 300719.SZChina$400M-32%-3%-4%n/an/an/a
Beijing Emerging Eastern Aviation Equipment 002933.SZChina$420M-20%-6%6%n/an/an/a
Virgin Galactic SPCEUnited States$420M-6%-39%-24,588%n/an/an/a
Chengdu Lihang Technology 603261.SSChina$458M+19%+35%-52%n/an/an/a
TAT Technologies TATTUnited States$481M+2%+14%11%20.6×16.8%+18.8%
Tokyo Keiki 7721.TJapan$494M-37%+5%9%14.1×n/an/a
Nippon Avionics 6946.TJapan$505M-26%+45%21%12.8×n/an/a
Figeac Aero FGA.PAFrance$506M-3%+13%6%20.5×14.7%+18.9%
Park Aerospace PKEUnited States$515M-30%+28%21%31.2×4.8%+9.6%
Satellogic SATLUnited States$535M-54%+369%-67%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Chenfull Precision's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Chengdu Tianjian Technology (002977.SZ), ispace,inc (9348.T), New Power Plasma (144960.KS), Beijing Hengyu Datacom Aviation Equipment (300965.SZ), Sichuan Tianwei Electronic (688511.SS), Integrity Technology (688244.SS), Innovative Solutions and Support (IA), MS International (MSI.L).
Is Chenfull Precision expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.8× against a peer median of 20.5×, 3rd most expensive of 10 in its peer set.
How has Chenfull Precision stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.9% against -22.6% for the median peer; over one year +39.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.