Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6657.HK Baiwang Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Baiwang Co., Ltd. Class H6657.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$504M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
28%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$103,031
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-17.8 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
150 days
5 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$10.95
1D+0.6%
1W+4.5%
1M-22.1%
3M-24.3%
6M-13.2%
YTD-45.2%
1Y-39.2%
ATR %9.6%
52w lowhigh45.2% off high

What Baiwang does

Employees: 754

Baiwang at a glance

Size Baiwang (6657.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $504M, the 753rd largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$10.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.2%, against -25.6% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.4% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.2%); the operating margin is -11.5% (peer median -6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 37.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.8× (most expensive of 9).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 17.8 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266657.HK 87Peer median 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Baiwang against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Baiwang financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$756MHK$790MHK$715MHK$788MHK$611M
Revenue growth—+11%-9%+29%—
Gross profitHK$307MHK$334MHK$286MHK$299MHK$237M
EBITDA-HK$69.2M-HK$8.30M-HK$170M-HK$291M-HK$95.3M
Net income-HK$64.3M-HK$10.4M-HK$543M-HK$396M-HK$179M
Free cash flow-HK$143M-HK$174M-HK$157M-HK$49.9M-HK$58.9M
Capital expenditureHK$19.8MHK$11.6MHK$8.38MHK$6.74MHK$5.21M
Total debtn/aHK$15.1MHK$3.16MHK$17.6MHK$29.0M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Baiwang competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%NRDSNEXN300588IIIV300830300290002995300663301315300550CSHRBRUNTOM23005711INN3003993011579890300352IVU6657.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Baiwang is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×30×NRDSNEXNIIIVTOM21INN9890IVU6657.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Baiwang is the large dot.

Baiwang competitors and peer comparison

How Baiwang compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Baiwang against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6657.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.1%-5.9%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-13.2%-25.6%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.2%-51.5%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.4%-4.2%9th highest of 19
Operating margin-11.5%-6.1%9th lowest of 20
Forward P/E37.2×8.8×most expensive of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-17.8 pp-10.9 pp7th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Baiwang 6657.HKHong Kong$504M-13%-3%-11%37.2×n/an/a
NerdWallet NRDSUnited States$504M-14%+12%11%9.6×-12.6%+27.8%
Nexxen International NEXNUnited States$503M+15%+3%5%7.6×6.3%+11.5%
Xinjiang Sailing Information Technology 300588.SZChina$505M-25%+19%-17%n/an/an/a
i3 Verticals IIIVUnited States$502M-10%-8%3%16.1×31.2%+7.3%
JinXianDai Information Industry 300830.SZChina$502M-29%-20%-42%n/a17.7%-8.8%
Bringspring Science & Technology 300290.SZChina$506M-66%-6%-13%n/an/an/a
Beijing Quanshi World Online Network Information 002995.SZChina$508M-15%-19%-13%n/a5.3%-19.1%
Client Service International 300663.SZChina$499M-45%-29%-85%n/a30.0%-10.7%
Shanghai Wisdom Information Technology 301315.SZChina$499M-26%-15%4%n/an/an/a
Heren Health 300550.SZChina$510M+18%-4%-11%n/a43.2%-0.9%
CoinShares CSHRUnited States$498M-36%n/an/a7.1×n/an/a
Boost Run BRUNUnited States$511M-68%n/a-47%n/a5.3%n/a
TomTom TOM2.ASNetherlands$511M-23%-7%12%16.9×-10.1%+1.0%
Hangzhou Anysoft Information Technology 300571.SZChina$512M-45%-12%-14%n/an/an/a
innoscripta 1INN.DEGermany$495M-37%+42%61%8.0×-13.3%+55.9%
Jiangxi Tianli Technology 300399.SZChina$514M-21%+6%2%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Huasu Technology 301157.SZChina$516M-19%+16%5%n/an/an/a
Tanwan 9890.HKHong Kong$517M-52%-4%-6%2.9×n/an/a
Beijing VRV Software 300352.SZChina$518M-67%+28%-110%n/a58.4%-13.7%
IVU Traffic Technologies IVU.DEGermany$518M+40%+10%13%28.8×6.8%+10.2%

Questions

Which companies are Baiwang's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: NerdWallet (NRDS), Nexxen International (NEXN), Xinjiang Sailing Information Technology (300588.SZ), i3 Verticals (IIIV), JinXianDai Information Industry (300830.SZ), Bringspring Science & Technology (300290.SZ), Beijing Quanshi World Online Network Information (002995.SZ), Client Service International (300663.SZ).
Is Baiwang expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.2× against a peer median of 8.8×, most expensive of 9 in its peer set.
How has Baiwang stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.2% against -25.6% for the median peer; over one year -39.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.