Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6139.TW L&K Engineering Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

L&K Engineering Co. Ltd.6139.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Provides cleanroom and factory engineering for Taiwan's semiconductor and pharmaceutical plants.

≈ Another specialized semiconductor cleanroom construction contractorMomentum laggard 15
Mkt cap
$3.81B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$44.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
-50 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$535.00
1D-5.6%
1W-15.9%
1M-32.3%
3M-31.9%
6M-22.6%
YTD-3.1%
1Y+23.6%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh45.8% off high

What L&K Engineering does

Provides cleanroom and factory engineering for Taiwan's semiconductor and pharmaceutical plants.

In one line: Another specialized semiconductor cleanroom construction contractor.

Products and services

  • Cleanroom construction
  • Piping/mechanical systems
  • Facility engineering services

Customers

  • Taiwan semiconductor fabs
  • Pharmaceutical manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Engineering & construction
  • Cleanroom/fab construction
  • Semiconductor + pharma facility…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor fab capex expansion

What could go wrong

  • Order lumpiness/customer concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Niche cleanroom engineering skill set tied closely to Taiwan's semiconductor fab buildout.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan · Founded: 1996

Named competitors

L&K Engineering at a glance

Size L&K Engineering (6139.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $3.81B, the 106th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$535.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 22.6%, against -15.1% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 77.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.9%); the operating margin is 16.8% (peer median 8.3%).

Valuation It trades at 6.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.1× (cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +41%, so the hurdle is -50 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 846139.TW 75
Six months, rebased to 100: L&K Engineering against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

L&K Engineering financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$96.4BNT$77.5BNT$65.1BNT$56.9BNT$35.7B
Revenue growth—+19%+14%+59%—
Gross profitNT$18.6BNT$12.3BNT$8.02BNT$5.05BNT$2.64B
EBITDANT$16.4BNT$10.3BNT$6.84BNT$4.25BNT$1.78B
Net incomeNT$11.7BNT$7.14BNT$4.34BNT$2.89BNT$999M
Free cash flowNT$14.5BNT$23.0BNT$12.5BNT$5.75BNT$7.41B
Capital expenditureNT$194MNT$239MNT$107MNT$46.0MNT$172M
Total debtNT$2.62BNT$2.33BNT$1.84BNT$2.64BNT$5.32B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

L&K Engineering competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%+20%BAMNB002683AGX0257ECG688248600667EXPO603568000429SCYR1721MYRGPRIM601611600583ATERVNLWORROAD6139.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. L&K Engineering is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×BAMNB002683AGX0257ECG688248600667EXPO603568000429SCYR1721MYRGPRIM601611600583RVNLWORROAD6139.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. L&K Engineering is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%BAMNB002683AGX0257ECG688248600667EXPO603568SCYR1721PRIMATEWORROAD6139.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. L&K Engineering is the large dot.

L&K Engineering competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6139.TW vs 2404.TW vs 6196.TW vs 5536.TWO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
L&K Engineering 6139.TW$3.81B-23%+78%17%6.5×-9.1%
United Integrated Services 2404.TW$5.11B-9%+72%18%9.7×-11.4%
Marketech International 6196.TW$2.68B+8%+44%7%13.0×6.3%
Acter 5536.TWO$2.39B-26%+28%16%10.0×-6.0%

How L&K Engineering compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

L&K Engineering against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6139.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-32.3%-3.0%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-22.6%-15.1%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.8%-40.0%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+77.7%+5.9%highest of 21
Operating margin16.8%8.3%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E6.5×18.1×cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.1%5.8%least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+41.0%+11.5%highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-50.1 pp-2.1 ppleast demanding of 17
EV / EBITDA5.7×10.2×cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-2.5×1.0×2nd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
L&K Engineering 6139.TWTaiwan$3.81B-23%+78%17%6.5×-9.1%+41.0%
Koninklijke BAM Groep BAMNB.ASNetherlands$3.85B+37%+7%3%11.5×-5.2%+0.8%
Guangdong Hongda 002683.SZChina$3.86B-7%+15%10%23.7×4.9%+26.1%
Argan AGXUnited States$3.89B-59%+29%15%20.5×0.3%+19.2%
China Everbright Environment 0257.HKHong Kong$3.91B-11%-5%29%7.0×-0.1%-8.5%
Everus Construction ECGUnited States$3.91B-53%+33%8%12.2×13.9%+11.5%
China Southern Power Grid Technology 688248.SSChina$3.71B-20%+28%12%47.6×25.8%+27.0%
Wuxi Taiji Industry 600667.SSChina$3.98B+32%-14%3%21.9×13.0%+11.5%
Exponent EXPOUnited States$3.99B+37%+15%21%32.6×10.8%+7.8%
Zhejiang Weiming Environment Protection 603568.SSChina$4.01B-27%-25%36%11.0×6.4%+15.0%
Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development 000429.SZChina$4.01B+9%+1%58%18.2×n/an/a
Sacyr SCYR.MCSpain$3.58B-14%+6%24%20.5×-5.4%+0.5%
Comsys 1721.TJapan$3.55B-15%+4%8%13.3×-0.7%+2.3%
MYR MYRGUnited States$4.09B-40%+23%6%18.1×14.0%+10.2%
Primoris Services PRIMUnited States$3.52B-38%-5%3%13.7×22.8%+16.8%
China Nuclear Engineering and Construction 601611.SSChina$4.22B-29%-14%4%26.9×n/an/a
Offshore Oil Engineering 600583.SSChina$4.22B-6%+7%8%12.1×n/an/a
Alten ATE.PAFrance$3.43B+43%0%8%11.4×3.5%+11.9%
Rail Vikas Nigam RVNL.NSIndia$4.27B-37%+5%4%46.0×n/an/a
Worley WOR.AXAustralia$3.39B-16%-5%4%12.6×5.2%+2.3%
Construction Partners ROADUnited States$4.38B-45%+42%9%26.5×12.5%+29.1%

Questions

Who are L&K Engineering's main competitors?
Named competitors: United Integrated Services (2404.TW), Marketech International (6196.TW), Acter Group (5536.TWO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Koninklijke BAM Groep (BAMNB.AS), Guangdong Hongda (002683.SZ), Argan (AGX), China Everbright Environment (0257.HK), Everus Construction (ECG), China Southern Power Grid Technology (688248.SS).
Is L&K Engineering expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.5× against a peer median of 18.1×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +41%, so the hurdle is -50 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has L&K Engineering stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -22.6% against -15.1% for the median peer; over one year +23.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.