Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 605378.SS Zhejiang Mustang Battery Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Zhejiang Mustang Battery Co., Ltd. Class A605378.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Electrical Products
Momentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$544M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$21.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-7.2 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥13.88
1D-5.8%
1W+9.1%
1M-19.6%
3M-0.5%
6M-31.6%
YTD-38.3%
1Y-41.1%
ATR %6.9%
52w lowhigh50.9% off high

What Zhejiang Mustang Battery does

Employees: 736

Zhejiang Mustang Battery at a glance

Size Zhejiang Mustang Battery (605378.SS) is a China Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $544M, the 3655th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥13.88 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 31.6%, against -24.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 10.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.8%); the operating margin is 1.7% (peer median 4.9%).

Valuation It trades at 2.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.2× (9th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.2 points below its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 73605378.SS 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Zhejiang Mustang Battery against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Zhejiang Mustang Battery financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.21BCN¥1.23BCN¥1.30BCN¥994MCN¥1.02B
Revenue growth—-5%+30%-2%—
Gross profitCN¥137MCN¥156MCN¥258MCN¥189MCN¥163M
EBITDACN¥63.2MCN¥90.9MCN¥174MCN¥131MCN¥106M
Net incomeCN¥16.9MCN¥58.2MCN¥153MCN¥106MCN¥98.7M
Free cash flow-CN¥12.9MCN¥8.62M-CN¥22.9MCN¥39.2MCN¥91.1M
Capital expenditureCN¥128MCN¥164MCN¥113MCN¥77.2MCN¥87.7M
Total debtCN¥28.5MCN¥5.17MCN¥14.6MCN¥44.5MCN¥24.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Zhejiang Mustang Battery competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-30%-20%-10%300932BLDP603344300062300563001266LGBBROSLTD004490603421600152300491CNTLZAP2655300040300447688448RAMRAT605378.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Zhejiang Mustang Battery is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×5×300932BLDP603344300062301439300563001266LGBBROSLTD004490603421600152300491ZAP2655300040300447688448RAMRAT605378.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Zhejiang Mustang Battery is the large dot.

Zhejiang Mustang Battery competitors and peer comparison

How Zhejiang Mustang Battery compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Zhejiang Mustang Battery against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure605378.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-19.6%-13.2%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-31.6%-24.9%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-50.9%-47.0%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-10.8%+14.8%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin1.7%4.9%7th lowest of 20
EV / Sales2.6×2.2×9th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.2 pp-3.5 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA50.5×14.7×most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-6.8×0.1×least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Zhejiang Mustang Battery 605378.SSChina$544M-32%-11%2%2.6×n/an/a
Sanyou 300932.SZChina$544M-21%+14%6%1.7×n/an/a
Ballard Power Systems BLDP.TOCanada$541M-66%+45%-47%0.5×n/an/a
Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) 603344.SSChina$555M-30%+7%6%1.0×7.0%+9.3%
Ceepower 300062.SZChina$532M-27%+19%-7%3.3×6.6%+4.1%
Weihai Honglin Electronic 301439.SZChina$559M-24%+18%5%1.1×n/an/a
Shenyu Communication Technology 300563.SZChina$529M-40%+2%7%3.8×16.2%+6.4%
Shanghai Smart Control 001266.SZChina$528M-16%+25%5%3.5×24.4%+6.1%
L.G. Balakrishnan & Bros LGBBROSLTD.NSIndia$562M-4%+21%11%1.6×n/an/a
SEBANG GLOBAL BATTERY 004490.KSSouth Korea$525M-18%-2%6%0.2×n/an/a
Qingdao Topscomm Communication 603421.SSChina$523M-35%-39%-50%3.0×5.8%-6.5%
Veken Technology 600152.SSChina$523M-56%+15%-7%2.2×n/an/a
Shijiazhuang Tonhe Electronics Technologies 300491.SZChina$566M-18%+33%1%2.1×n/an/a
Centiel CNTL.SWSwitzerland$570M+45%-100%n/an/an/an/a
Zaptec ZAP.OLNorway$519M+31%+34%10%2.3×-2.8%+47.5%
Guoxia Technology 2655.HKHong Kong$513M-66%+78%9%1.3×n/an/a
Harbin Jiuzhou 300040.SZChina$513M-26%-3%9%5.3×17.6%+2.6%
Shaanxi Baoguang Vacuum Electronic Apparatus 600379.SSChina$580M-30%+7%5%3.1×37.9%+7.0%
Nanjing Quanxin Cable Technology 300447.SZChina$581M-35%+8%4%4.4×29.2%+3.3%
Nanjing CIGU Technology 688448.SSChina$581M-15%-18%-7%9.2×n/an/a
Ram Ratna Wires RAMRAT.NSIndia$508M+13%+72%4%0.8×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Zhejiang Mustang Battery's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sanyou (300932.SZ), Ballard Power Systems (BLDP.TO), Cinderson Tech (Suzhou) (603344.SS), Ceepower (300062.SZ), Weihai Honglin Electronic (301439.SZ), Shenyu Communication Technology (300563.SZ), Shanghai Smart Control (001266.SZ), L.G. Balakrishnan & Bros (LGBBROSLTD.NS).
Is Zhejiang Mustang Battery expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.6× against a peer median of 2.2×, 9th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Zhejiang Mustang Battery stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -31.6% against -24.9% for the median peer; over one year -41.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.